10 Crucial steps when you’re hit with an EEOC complaint
April 24, 2009 by Jim GiulianoPosted in: Complaint investigation, Employment law, Records documentation, Special Report, Terminations, policies

How employers respond to an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission complaint often spells the difference between a speedy, successful defense and a nightmare investigation.
A disgruntled employee goes to the EEOC and files charges of bias. Here’s how to respond:
1. Tell the whole story. Because an EEOC charge often contains just one or two paragraphs, companies tend to respond in a similar, brief way. Don’t.
Put together a comprehensive response, detailing the circumstances surrounding the employment relationship and the reasons for an adverse employment action. This is the time you cut the claim off at the knees, so don’t skimp on info.
2. Include documentation. If you have supporting documents, attach them in your response. What’s appropriate? You name it: time sheets, e-mails, performance evaluations — anything that supports your case.
3. Check and double-check your documentation. Then check it again, bringing in others to help. The documentation should be accurate and consistent. If it isn’t, a smart attorney will use glitches to show a judge that you’re not being honest.
4. Mention similar decisions. One of the best ways to demonstrate that a decision wasn’t motivated by unlawful discrimination is to point to the same actions being taken in similar situations against other employees.
For example, if you terminated a woman for misconduct and she says her termination was motivated by sex discrimination, detail instances when you terminated men for the same misconduct.
5. Explain what your company does. Give an EEOC investigator a full picture of your business and how the employee’s behavior or conduct affected your business. For instance, if you fired someone for being late too many times, explain why punctuality is so important to your operation.
6. Let employees know only what they need to know. There’s a chance investigators will contact employees, and they should be prepared for it, without knowing all the details. A typical message to employees: “While we do not feel there is any merit to the allegations, we respect Employee X’s right to bring this charge. If you are contacted by the agency, you should cooperate and be completely honest with the investigator.”
7. Don’t delay. Putting off your response is never a good idea.
8. Contact a lawyer. It’s almost unavoidable. At the very least, you’ll want an attorney to review your response and be prepared for a legal chain of events.
9. Contact your insurer. Many employment-practices liability policies define claims to include discrimination charges. Failing to let your insurer know about the charge could result in denial of coverage, not only for the charge but all subsequent legal claims.
10. Put all relevant documents in a “lock box.” When you receive a notice of a charge, collect and preserve all documents that could be relevant. That means you may want to let IT and other departments know that they have to suspend routine “cleaning out” procedures that could result in destruction of relevant records. If you don’t, your lawyer will have a hard time convincing a judge that the destruction of documents was all just a big, unintentional mistake.



April 27th, 2009 at 2:02 pm
Hi
Please change my email address to juanitazr@sbcglobal.net effective immediately.
Thank you – Juanita
April 27th, 2009 at 3:12 pm
re: step 6 in the article — in some public jurisdictins (don’t know about private industry) the fact that an employee has filed a complaint is privacy-protected. Notifying possible witnesses that a named employee has filed a complaint would be at best premature and at worst a legal violation. I would only say that investiogator X from the Y department (or from the firm of Z, or from the EEOC etc) will be investigating certain matters on approx dates and all employees who may be interviewed are encouraged (or expected) to cooperate with the investigator, and not to share those discussions with others; for questions contact AB in the personnel (or legal) office. That way only those with a need to know (i.e. those actually interviewed by the investigator) will learn that Sally filed the complaint. In some interviews, even that may not be disclosed if the questions are about general practices etc.
April 27th, 2009 at 3:39 pm
good article
April 28th, 2009 at 2:15 am
I agree with Mike about the privacy protection. If you disclose that kind of information to others, you may have more problems.
April 28th, 2009 at 5:51 am
Thank you, I have always documented everything with the assumption that you never have enough.
April 28th, 2009 at 8:46 am
AMEN! Good article. Follow the steps to the “t”. In these economic times, employers will probably see more and more EEOC cases coupled with unemployment cases.
July 23rd, 2009 at 2:08 pm
Are private companies required to advertise an open position? Or is management permitted to hire his wife’s sister’s friend the same day the original employee submitted her 2-week notice?