3 dangerous myths supervisors have about sexual harassment
August 1, 2008 by Jim GiulianoPosted in: Behavior, Communication, Complaint investigation, Discipline, Employment law, Sexual harrassment, Special Report, Supervisors

Sad to say, most charges of sexual harassment grow out of some common misunderstandings about what the danger signs are. Time and time again, supervisors use those misunderstandings as a defense — and companies pay for it.
Supervisory trainer Lynne Curry often hears the three reasons managers give for overlooking harassment that seemingly goes on right under their noses:
- “No one ever asked her for sex.” That defense is common because too many supervisors think sexual harassment is only about sex. Of course, it’s not, nor is it about “romance.” Supervisors need to be aware that the category includes comments, innuendo, insults and so-called “harmless” physical contact.
- “She never complained.” Victims do have some responsibility for ringing the alarm, but in many court cases, judges and juries have warned that supervisors have responsibility, too. The reason: The law recognizes that victims often are intimidated and reluctant to make waves for fear of losing their jobs or just being branded as troublemakers. That means the supervisor has a responsibility to be proactive about suspicions, and not wait until the victim pleads for help.
- “He’s a great employee who’d never do something like that.” Good people do dumb things all the time. And sometimes a supervisor may be reluctant to take action against a high-performing or well-liked employee, for fear of losing the employee’s services or having to find a good replacement. Here’s how that looks to a court: You let someone victimize another employee because of business convenience. Then things start to get really expensive for the employer.
Tags: court, sexual harassment, Supervisors

August 11th, 2008 at 5:05 pm
Quite frankly, I was surprised that at least one of the “dangerous myths” did not include the false assumption that only women are sexually harassed. All the text (”no one asked her for sex”, “she never complained”, “he…would never do something like that”) accompanying the article referred to male to female harassment. This was especially curious considering that the titillating photo accompanying the article shows a female in a sexy pair of high heels stepping on a male’s tie and “harassing him”. You also have had articles in the past mentioning that male to male harassment claims have skyrocketed recently. This, in fact, was the only type of claim (one instance) we have had at our company. Most of your articles are spot on, but you missed the boat on this one.