HRMorning.com » Answers to tricky HR questions: What are our legal obligations for stopping offensive e-mail?

Answers to tricky HR questions: What are our legal obligations for stopping offensive e-mail?

July 1, 2008 by Jim Giuliano
Posted in: Answers to tricky HR questions, Communication, Complaint investigation, Employment law, In this week's e-newsletter, Latest News & Views, Sexual harrassment, policies

Our team of experts fields real-life, everyday questions from HR managers and gives practical answers that can be applied by any HR pro in the same situation. Today’s question: What are an employer’s obligations for stopping “spam” that employees find offensive?

Question:
Like a lot of companies, we get bulk e-mail (”spam”) that could be called offensive. We have spam-filtering software, but of course it doesn’t catch everything.  Also, sometimes outsiders send sexually explicit jokes, cartoons, etc.

What’s our liability in these instances regarding employees who find the material offensive and demand that we stop it? Could our failure to do so be cited as sexual harassment?

Answer:
One of the keys here is whether you’re making a good-faith effort to stop the spam, explains Hunter Lott, a partner with the HR consulting firm HCap International. Using modern spam-filtering software appears to meet the good-faith standard.

As for individual e-mails (jokes, etc.) that people may find offensive: Once people report the problem and the source, you must take reasonable steps to prevent further incidents, such as informing the sender to stop or, if technically possible, blocking e-mails from that sender.

  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , , ,

2 Responses to “Answers to tricky HR questions: What are our legal obligations for stopping offensive e-mail?”

  1. freeda Says:

    When does FMLA actually starts for a pregnant lady? from the time they conceive and bring the certification or the time their due date is? Do they have 12 weeks unpaid from exactly when?

  2. Karen Says:

    When she begins her leave of absence, which would be certified by her doctor. She would have the 12 weeks starting the day she starts to miss work, rather it be intermittantly (which you would need to track), or if she needs to leave early (a doctor taking her off of work) or when she actually has the baby.
    In other words, from the time she begins missing time that is related to her pregnancy/illness that is substantiated by a doctor’s note that says she is unable to perform the functions of her job.
    Hope that helps.

Leave a Reply



advertisement

Whitepapers

Recent Popular Articles



advertisement


































































a