Human Resources News & Insights

Big sticking point in NFL lockout: Workers’ comp benefits

We’re glad to see pro football back. It seemed like the NFL’s labor lockout went on far too long. One reason for that: the disagreement about workers’ compensation benefits for players.

One of the major issues in the lockout was about claims filed in California.

Under the state’s current law, players are allowed to make a workers’ comp claim in California if they’ve been hurt and played at least one game within the state.

As you can imagine, that’s resulted in several former players seeking comp benefits in the state, despite never having played on a team based there.

Some of these players have received awards or settlements worth more than $100,000.

Days before the NFL and the NFL Players Association reached an agreement that got the game back on the field, New Orleans Saints quarterback Drew Brees shared an email with NBC sports in which he stated the NFL was trying to restrict in which states players can file for workers’ comp.

He then added: The players won’t let the league restrict their long-term health and safety.

Ultimately, it appears as though the players won the workers’ comp battle. Under the league’s new collective bargaining agreement, the rules for filing a claim in California remain the same.

Subscribe Today

Get the latest and greatest Human Resources news and insights delivered to your inbox.
  • Luther

    That’s why I don’t watch professional sports anymore, or have cable. Whether you watch it or not, you’re paying for it!

  • Common Sense

    Other than the electricity to the tv, how are you paying for watching football on a network channel?

  • Ticked Off

    My question is: why the heck aren’t they filing in their state of residency? Heaven knows, the last thing the CA system needs is to be paying expensive work comp claims on a bunch of overpaid game-players!

  • Alison

    There are numerous ways you pay for professional sports besides electricity for the TV. Here is just one example-if you eat at a restaurant or stay in a hotel in Marion County (Indianapolis, IN) and it’s surrounding counties, you are helping to pay for the Colt’s stadium. Mitch Daniels decided to add an extra tax to the usage of these facilities for that specific reason. So whether you’re a Colts fan or not, if you are tired or hungry in the Indianapolis area, you are paying for football.

  • Jeff

    If you pay for cable t.v., whether you watch a certain channel or program, or not, you are still subsidizing the ones you don’t watch.

  • Common Sense

    @JEff and Allison. I obviously understand that their are other cost and benefits to a professional football team other than paying for tickets and going to the game. For example, I know many cities have to pay for extra police during football games. This cost is hopefully more than offset by the extra revenue brought into the city. Luther already stated he did not have cable. I simply asked how he was paying for football by watching it on network tv. With that being said, it seems to me that one would be more likely to watch something, knowing they were already paying for it anyway. “I don’t utilize a product because I am paying for it” seems to be an illogical argument.