Human Resources News & Insights

California aims to prevent marijuana-use discrimination: Start of a trend?

If this bill passes, medical marijuana users in California will be classified as a protected class and employers will be unable to discriminate against them because of their marijuana usage.

While the California Supreme Court has made it clear employers don’t have to accommodate medical marijuana use, AB 2069 would prohibit employers from discriminating against workers based on their status as card-carrying medical marijuana user by placing them in a protected class.

The legislation would amend the current definition and prohibit discrimination based on “race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, gender identity, gender expression, age, sexual orientation, or military
and veteran status.”

The bill passed a Committee vote, but is currently on hold as lawmakers look to tweak the language of the legislation.

We’ll keep you posted on any upcoming developments.

The new role of marijuana

Legislation to ban marijuana-use discrimination is part of a growing trend of general acceptance for the substance that was once a workplace taboo.

In fact, many believe it’s only a matter of time before we see medical marijuana as part of prescription drug plans.

Their reasoning: A total 29 states and the District of Columbia have legalized medical marijuana, and a slew of others have taken it a step further and OK’d the recreational use of the substance.

Plus, in light of the opioid crisis, many see medical marijuana as a safer alternative to opiates because it doesn’t carry the risks of overdosing.

All of these factors are leading some experts to surmise that medical marijuana will be a reimbursable option in employers’ prescription drug plans in the near future.

Why it could happen

According to Michele Hibbert-Iacobacci, head of information management and support for Mitchell Casualty Solutions in San Diego and the co-author of a white paper that covers medical marijuana reimbursement, the marijuana industry has the momentum to make prescription drug reimbursement a reality, but it just needs a bit more on the medical safety side of things.

As Hibbert-Iacobacci puts it:

“I don’t see how this train will stop rolling. The [marijuana] industry is huge. It employs a lot of people. They just have to show that its use is safe from a medical perspective.”

And employment attorneys like Larry Casey, of the Davis, Malm & D’Agostine law firm, see a potential recruiting benefit for employers who do wind up covering medical marijuana in their health plans. In a recent SHRM article, Casey said:

“In an industry or area of the country that is progressive about the use of marijuana for medical purposes, covering medical marijuana could help an organization be seen as a progressive employer.”

The biggest barrier

Regardless of how much momentum the medical marijuana reimbursement movement gains or how many states legalize the substance, there is still one giant problem: The federal government classifies marijuana as a Schedule I drug — a designation it uses on substances like heroin, LSD and ecstasy.

This classification gives marijuana the harshest range of criminal penalties and is the reason why the U.S. Food and Drug Administration hasn’t approved medical marijuana and, in all likelihood, won’t until it is reclassified to a lower schedule.

The Schedule I tag is also why, even if employers would like to offer medical marijuana reimbursement, they will likely have a difficult time finding an insurance provider that’s willing to offer health insurance or workers’ comp plans that cover medical marijuana.

Self-insured plans can cover medical marijuana. However, the patchwork of state and local regs combined with the uncertainty of the feds’ stance, makes this a far from easy proposition for employers, too.

As Mary Kay O’Neill, an MD and partner with Mercer, says: “It is difficult to come up with policies for national employers, who are often reluctant to administer a patchwork benefit.”

Still, many believe the push for legalized marijuana will lead to a reclassification of the current Schedule I designation. And when that happens, it’ll only be a matter of time before medical marijuana finds its way into employer-sponsored health plans.

Print Friendly

Subscribe Today

Get the latest and greatest Human Resources news and insights delivered to your inbox.

Comments

  1. Courtney Herod says:

    It’s the high-time when the States should shed their step-fatherly treatment with the medical marijuana users, not only in their workplace but everywhere. In the light of the fact that medicinal values of marijuana have been discovered through scientific researches & studies, the authorities should encourage the use of medical marijuana for well-being, health & happiness. Not only this, rather they should grant tax concessions and rebates on Income Tax, to the licensed and reputed medical marijuana specialists like Online Medical Card (https://www.onlinemedicalcard.com) who have stood with the ailing community passionately, more than professionally.

  2. Greg Cochran says:

    Who is responsible when a marijuana user is working on my vehicle and screws up the repair and I have an accident because of the screw up? Is it the repair shop? If i am the repair shop owner I am not going to accept the liability of having a marijuana user working in such a position.

    • Kristen Delligatti says:

      Please grow up. Marijuana users are already employed at your business and working on your vehicles at shops. They are lawyers, doctors, office workers, and mechanics. The world will not break out in mad chaos because of medical mj. In fact, it may be a little nicer.

    • laurie66bay says:

      This is what is wrong with parts of America today.
      Pot users get special rights while hard working normal people get the shaft and are expected to pay for the stoners drugs with higher taxes and healthcare costs.

      President Trump…help!

  3. Such delusional bullshit. I’ve smoked weed recreationally for years. However, I don’t smoke at work nor am I a daily user. If I owned a company I would not want people at work stoned, legal or not, it’s irresponsible and makes a poor impression with clients and the general public.

Speak Your Mind

*