<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Company to judge: &#8216;The dog ate our investigation&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hrmorning.com/company-to-judge-the-dog-ate-our-investigation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/company-to-judge-the-dog-ate-our-investigation/</link>
	<description>Your daily dose of HR</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:43:13 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: diane</title>
		<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/company-to-judge-the-dog-ate-our-investigation/comment-page-1/#comment-23081</link>
		<dc:creator>diane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrmorning.com/?p=3415#comment-23081</guid>
		<description>ccms - yes, it&#039;d is grammatically correctly - according to Microsoft Word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ccms &#8211; yes, it&#8217;d is grammatically correctly &#8211; according to Microsoft Word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ccms</title>
		<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/company-to-judge-the-dog-ate-our-investigation/comment-page-1/#comment-19377</link>
		<dc:creator>ccms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 23:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrmorning.com/?p=3415#comment-19377</guid>
		<description>Is &quot;it&#039;d&quot; a proper contraction? Looks and sounds lazy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is &#8220;it&#8217;d&#8221; a proper contraction? Looks and sounds lazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggie Mentel</title>
		<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/company-to-judge-the-dog-ate-our-investigation/comment-page-1/#comment-18801</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Mentel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 19:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrmorning.com/?p=3415#comment-18801</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe they were only fined $65,000.  I think it should have been higher just because they are idiots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe they were only fined $65,000.  I think it should have been higher just because they are idiots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 6/15 queries in 0.012 seconds using disk

Served from: lamp03.pbp.com @ 2010-03-21 06:17:05 -->