HRMorning.com » Firings for offensive Facebook posts upheld

Firings for offensive Facebook posts upheld

November 18, 2011 by Tim Gould
Posted in: Employment law, In this week's e-newsletter, Latest News & Views, Terminations



Here’s some good news: In two separate cases, authorities have stamped their  official OK on the termination of employees who’d written offensive posts on social media sites.

In the first case, Paterson, N.J. teacher Jennifer O’Brien posted, “(I’m) not a teacher — I’m a warden for future criminals” on her Facebook page, according to a story in The Record.

She was suspended. And then following a hearing, administrative law judge Ellen Bass ruled O’Brien should lose her tenured job.

Citing Paterson’s problems with poverty and violence, Bass wrote, “O’Brien has demonstrated a complete lack of sensitivity to the world in which her students live.

“The sentiment that a 6-year-old will not rise above the criminal element that surrounds him cuts right to the bone.”

The final firing decision now goes to the state education commissioner, who has 45 days to issue a ruling.

An unacceptable job title

The second case involves a man who used a profane and not-socially-acceptable term as his job title on his LinkedIn page.

His employers didn’t see the posting until several months later.

In the meantime, company employees used social media to discuss a wage and hour lawsuit concerning another firm’s practice of giving workers comp time in lieu of overtime.

The first employer had a similar policy, which it eventually changed.

After the policy change, the employer discovered the profane job description on LinkedIn. Company officials told the employee the post was in violation of its electronic communications policy and fired him.

He filed a complaint with the National Labor Relations Board, saying his questionable LinkedIn post wasn’t the real reason for his discharge — it was the comments he had made about the companies overtime policies.

But NLRB officials didn’t buy it. Barry Kearney, NLRB associate general counsel, wrote in an advice memorandum that “there is no evidence that the employer was even aware (of the employee’s comments about overtime), and certainly no demonstrated animus towards employees discussing their working conditions.”

What’s more, Kearney said, the employer only discovered the offensive post as part of an assessment of problems it was running into on the firm’s LinkedIn page.

 

 

 

  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , ,



HRMorning.com delivers the latest HR news once a week to the inboxes of over 200,000 HR professionals.

Sign up for HR Morning's free e-newsletter!




One Response to “Firings for offensive Facebook posts upheld”

  1. Kebby Hall Says:

    Where do employers find the time to watch their employees activities on social sites? Got to be a boring job unless you like snooping in others business. Some have tried to argue this is personal and an invasion of privacy, kinda like mail with their name on it, and should not be held against them if the activity did not iniate from work. That’s why today we must be careful and mindful of all our actions. What was OK or overlooked today may not be tomorrow. Keep things in perspective.

Leave a Reply

IMPORTANT! To be able to proceed, you need to solve the following simple math (so we know that you are a human) :-)

What is 13 + 6 ?
Please leave these two fields as-is:


advertisement

twitter iconfollow us on Twitter
facebook icon iconjoin our group on Facebook

Research

Popular Human Resources Articles



advertisement






























































a