Human Resources News & Insights

FLSA: Calculating overtime when travel time is involved

Do you know how to calculate overtime pay for this employee without running afoul of the FLSA?

Here’s the scenario: You pay a non-exempt employee who travels a lot on the job one rate for in-office work and another, reduced rate for when he’s merely on the road traveling and not doing normal work.

Calculating OT

Calculating overtime in cases like this actually aren’t as tricky as they first appear. At the very least, you have to calculate overtime pay for the employee using the employee’s average pay rate.

An example

This kind of legal pay policy is best illustrated with an example:

Say you’ve got an employee who regularly works 35 hours in the office a week, but also has to spend an additional 10 hours a week traveling on the job (commuting to and from work doesn’t count).

He earns $15 an hour for his regular in-office work and gets paid only $10 an hour for travel time.

So he earns $525 for his in-office work (35 x $15) and another $100 for his travel time (10 x $10).

That makes for a total weekly compensation of $625 for 45 hours of work ($525 + $100).

To determine his average pay rate, divide his total weekly compensation ($625) by the total amount of hours worked (45). That comes to an average hourly rate of $13.89.

So his overtime must be paid at the rate of $20.84 per hour, which is 1.5 times his average rate of pay.

Make it transparent to employees

Although this type of compensation structure is perfectly legal, the key to avoiding employee confusion and gaining their buy-in is to explain the breakdown in advance, so there are no surprises come payday.

Even though you’d be able to win a dispute — if one were filed by an employee — with the Department of Labor, you don’t want it to reach that stage.

Source: Labor lawyer Rich Paul of the San Diego law firm of Paul, Plevin, Sullivan & Connaughton, spoke at the 2012 LEAP symposium in Las Vegas.

Subscribe Today

Get the latest and greatest Human Resources news and insights delivered to your inbox.
  • Mark

    That doesn’t seem right as 5 of the 45 hours should have be at time and a half. I would have used $525 for the 35 hours and $50 for 5 (of the 10) for travel time. This would then calculate to $14.38 per hour for a 40 hour week. The additional 5 hours should be compensated at $14.38 per hour. I think that the average rate needs to be determined for a 40 hour week and not 45. Do you agree?

  • Chris P.

    The article didn’t really give the final answer. The calculation is a “weighted average” since there are 2 pay rates during the same week. So the total straight time pay (for ALL 45 hours) is $625. (Again, he only worked 35 hours at the $15/hr rate). Since the “time” of the “time and one half” has been paid for all 45 hours (including the 5 hrs. of OT), they only owe the additional “one half” (one half the ‘regular rate’). Since in the example the ‘regular rate’ is $13.89 (total straight time wages divided by total hours worked)… they owe half of that for each hour worked over 40 (13.89 x .05 = 6.95) $6.95 x 5 = $34.75 (this is the additional OT due) Total gross wages: 625 + 34.75 = $659.75.

  • Grant_X

    Seems like this should be a salaried employee. If it were, no OT calculations and more incentive for the employee to cut back on their travel time (which tends to get inflated).

  • MMAN

    @Grant_X…you can’t just classify someone as salaried (I’m thinking you mean exempt) simply for the convenience (or savings) of not paying/calculating OT. Other considerations are necessary according to FSLA. There’s not enough information in the article to base this recommendation on.