<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I-9s &amp; E-Verify: (Almost) everything you need to know</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hrmorning.com/i-9s-e-verify-almost-everything-you-need-to-know/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/i-9s-e-verify-almost-everything-you-need-to-know/</link>
	<description>Your daily dose of HR</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:43:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Yves</title>
		<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/i-9s-e-verify-almost-everything-you-need-to-know/comment-page-1/#comment-2214</link>
		<dc:creator>Yves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 03:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrmorning.com/?p=252#comment-2214</guid>
		<description>Is there a way to obtain the list of companies under e-verify?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a way to obtain the list of companies under e-verify?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Giuliano</title>
		<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/i-9s-e-verify-almost-everything-you-need-to-know/comment-page-1/#comment-731</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Giuliano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 15:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrmorning.com/?p=252#comment-731</guid>
		<description>To Carol and Stacy:
Just to clarify, E-verify is in fact set to lose funding in November. However, what Congress does is anyone&#039;s guess. In fact, there are bills being introduced (and which we&#039;re watching) that would extend funding for E-verify. The bottom line is, I think, we won&#039;t know what&#039;s going to happen in November until November.

Jim Giuliano
Managing Editor
HR Morning</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Carol and Stacy:<br />
Just to clarify, E-verify is in fact set to lose funding in November. However, what Congress does is anyone&#8217;s guess. In fact, there are bills being introduced (and which we&#8217;re watching) that would extend funding for E-verify. The bottom line is, I think, we won&#8217;t know what&#8217;s going to happen in November until November.</p>
<p>Jim Giuliano<br />
Managing Editor<br />
HR Morning</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/i-9s-e-verify-almost-everything-you-need-to-know/comment-page-1/#comment-679</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 17:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrmorning.com/?p=252#comment-679</guid>
		<description>In response to Wendy - the employees need not be fired it they go to the SSA office and get it straightened out. In fact, if the employee contests, they should be allowed to continue to work until the matter is resolved. I agree, it will be inevitable that some people will come back as tentative nonconfirmed that are actually authorized workers, but there is no fool-proof system. It will be a hassle, but if in fact the person has a valid SS#, it should be resolved and he will not lose his job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to Wendy &#8211; the employees need not be fired it they go to the SSA office and get it straightened out. In fact, if the employee contests, they should be allowed to continue to work until the matter is resolved. I agree, it will be inevitable that some people will come back as tentative nonconfirmed that are actually authorized workers, but there is no fool-proof system. It will be a hassle, but if in fact the person has a valid SS#, it should be resolved and he will not lose his job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/i-9s-e-verify-almost-everything-you-need-to-know/comment-page-1/#comment-675</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrmorning.com/?p=252#comment-675</guid>
		<description>It is my understanding that our Governor in Illinois has made it illegal or unconstitutinal for us to use everify. Is this still the case?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is my understanding that our Governor in Illinois has made it illegal or unconstitutinal for us to use everify. Is this still the case?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Myrna Keitges</title>
		<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/i-9s-e-verify-almost-everything-you-need-to-know/comment-page-1/#comment-672</link>
		<dc:creator>Myrna Keitges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 16:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrmorning.com/?p=252#comment-672</guid>
		<description>I have an issue with requirement #3 of E-verifty, as the instructions on the I-9 clearly state that the employer cannot specofy which documents employees provide.  Is this not a conflict with the regulations?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have an issue with requirement #3 of E-verifty, as the instructions on the I-9 clearly state that the employer cannot specofy which documents employees provide.  Is this not a conflict with the regulations?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacy</title>
		<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/i-9s-e-verify-almost-everything-you-need-to-know/comment-page-1/#comment-671</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrmorning.com/?p=252#comment-671</guid>
		<description>With the recent news that the funding for the e-verify system is not being renewed on November 30th, this story is somewhat irrelevant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the recent news that the funding for the e-verify system is not being renewed on November 30th, this story is somewhat irrelevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol</title>
		<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/i-9s-e-verify-almost-everything-you-need-to-know/comment-page-1/#comment-669</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrmorning.com/?p=252#comment-669</guid>
		<description>This week, during consideration of the 2009 spending bill for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the House Appropriations Committee decided not to extend the &quot;E-Verify&quot; program for 10 years beyond the program&#039;s November 30 expiration date. 

During the past two years, nine states have enacted laws requiring certain employers to use E-Verify in confirming the work eligibility of new hires.  If Congress fails to reauthorize the program -- or substitute an alternative verification system -- before the November 30 deadline, many of these state mandates may become null and void.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week, during consideration of the 2009 spending bill for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the House Appropriations Committee decided not to extend the &#8220;E-Verify&#8221; program for 10 years beyond the program&#8217;s November 30 expiration date. </p>
<p>During the past two years, nine states have enacted laws requiring certain employers to use E-Verify in confirming the work eligibility of new hires.  If Congress fails to reauthorize the program &#8212; or substitute an alternative verification system &#8212; before the November 30 deadline, many of these state mandates may become null and void.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendy Weinbaum</title>
		<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/i-9s-e-verify-almost-everything-you-need-to-know/comment-page-1/#comment-667</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendy Weinbaum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 13:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrmorning.com/?p=252#comment-667</guid>
		<description>Just like when the Feds implemented the NIC background checks for buying guns, and thousands of innocent people were denied the right to buy a gun because their name was similar to that of a felon, so too a lot of hapless citizens will be fired here, I&#039;ll wager.  All because of database errors and false-positive &quot;matches&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just like when the Feds implemented the NIC background checks for buying guns, and thousands of innocent people were denied the right to buy a gun because their name was similar to that of a felon, so too a lot of hapless citizens will be fired here, I&#8217;ll wager.  All because of database errors and false-positive &#8220;matches&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
