HRMorning.com » Anti-harassment training a waste of money? Check the statistics

Anti-harassment training a waste of money? Check the statistics

June 13, 2008 by Jim Giuliano
Posted in: Behavior, Complaint investigation, Employment law, In this week's e-newsletter, Latest News & Views, Sexual harrassment, Training

With budgets getting tighter and tighter, you’ll probably need to prove that training to prevent sexual harassment actually works. Some numbers that tie training to complaints could help.

First, understand that, overall, complaints about sexual harassment and discrimination have risen in the last year to record numbers - the 83,000 complaints filed with EEOC represents the greatest number since 1992. No one’s sure why, but some speculate that a sour economy produces sour employees who are more likely to complain and sue. 

However, sexual harassment complaints had been dropping steadily, and even when they rose, the increase was usually at a lesser rate than other types of complaints, such as discrimination. Why the apparent slowing of sexual harassment complaints? The answer points to training. 

Three relevant factors

In 1997, when sexual harassment complaints began to decline, in a landmark case the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a company could present an “affirmative defense” against charges of sexual harassment - meaning any steps to train employees on avoiding harassment would count in the employer’s favor when a complaint was filed. 

A lot of companies picked up on that cue and began specific training on sexual harassment. Result: Complaints dropped. 

Another factor: The country’s most populous state, California, made sexual harassment training mandatory for employers.

And a study by the law firm of Littler Mendelson showed that complaints about sexual harassment dropped 37% after Washington state implemented mandatory training for government employees. The savings in administrative and legal costs amounted to $2 million.

The message: Training works, and it saves money and aggravation in the long run.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tags: , , , ,

Leave a Reply


advertisement

    Quick Vote

    • Do you think President-elect Obama’s policies on employment law will:

      View Results

      Loading ... Loading ...

  • advertisement

    See what readers are saying...

    • Gretchen: If you have documented conversations with an employee after they have moved from full-time to part-time because of an in...
    • HR-USA: Whether or not it has "Passed" requirement, I feel it would behove us HR personal and as US citizens to use it. It en...
    • DRUNK-HR: Hey; Show me where those jobs are.. I think it would be hilarious to sit around and "judge" co-workers who get drunk, o...
    • LIBERATEDMOMMY: I see and read it all the time. It boils down to.. Families are made to feel uncomfortable when a spouse chooses to sta...
    • Beth Helman: I also have certain checklists, but not for everything that Lisa King seems to. So, Lisa, I would really appreciate you...
    • Ann: There is some real value to HR sitting in on performance appraisals. While it is time consuming we find we become more ...