http://www.hrmorning.com/news-supreme-court-says-it%e2%80%99s-ok-for-employers-to-reduce-retiree-health-benefits/ Your daily dose of HR Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:43:13 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 http://www.hrmorning.com/news-supreme-court-says-it%e2%80%99s-ok-for-employers-to-reduce-retiree-health-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-104 ron larson Mon, 31 Mar 2008 19:50:12 +0000 http://www.hrmorning.com/news-supreme-court-says-it%e2%80%99s-ok-for-employers-to-reduce-retiree-health-benefits/#comment-104 Does this Supreme Court ruling include government employees when they reach age 65? Does this Supreme Court ruling include government employees when they reach age 65?

]]> http://www.hrmorning.com/news-supreme-court-says-it%e2%80%99s-ok-for-employers-to-reduce-retiree-health-benefits/comment-page-1/#comment-103 Peter P. Rojcewicz Mon, 31 Mar 2008 18:33:55 +0000 http://www.hrmorning.com/news-supreme-court-says-it%e2%80%99s-ok-for-employers-to-reduce-retiree-health-benefits/#comment-103 Does the new Supreme Court ruling apply to employers who had not yet, at the time of the ruling, put in the stipulation that retirees benefits funding can be reduced? Or will those employees covered under their employers' pre-ruling full retiree benefit plans be "grandfathered?" Does the new Supreme Court ruling apply to employers who had not yet, at the time of the ruling, put in the stipulation that retirees benefits funding can be reduced? Or will those employees covered under their employers’ pre-ruling full retiree benefit plans be “grandfathered?”

]]>