<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One option that could save companies 5% on salaries</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hrmorning.com/one-option-that-could-save-you-5-on-salaries/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/one-option-that-could-save-you-5-on-salaries/</link>
	<description>Your daily dose of HR</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 03:19:47 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TerriG</title>
		<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/one-option-that-could-save-you-5-on-salaries/comment-page-1/#comment-34952</link>
		<dc:creator>TerriG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 22:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrmorning.com/?p=5447#comment-34952</guid>
		<description>OK, nearly 2 months late in posting a reply, but here goes: 
PRinVA and Carol are completely on the right track.  About 5 or 6 years ago, one of those news magazines, like 20/20 or PrimeTime did a story on a family where both spouses worked - one worked a full-time, plus a part-time job, one worked a full-time job and between the commuting, the day care, the meals out and utilities (their house ran 24/7 basically), they were losing $15,000 a year in expenses.  It was outrageous!  I&#039;ll always remember the bottom line, because at the time I was a stay@home mom because of the cost of day care - it was cheaper for me to stay@home than to work to pay for day care.
So, it makes sense that in the course of a month, 5% off my paycheck will probably net me twice that in savings per month in household expenses for day care, gas and meals out.   Less wear and tear, less stress, and my kids come home to me a couple a times a week - hey and dinner!  Who wouldn&#039;t want that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, nearly 2 months late in posting a reply, but here goes:<br />
PRinVA and Carol are completely on the right track.  About 5 or 6 years ago, one of those news magazines, like 20/20 or PrimeTime did a story on a family where both spouses worked &#8211; one worked a full-time, plus a part-time job, one worked a full-time job and between the commuting, the day care, the meals out and utilities (their house ran 24/7 basically), they were losing $15,000 a year in expenses.  It was outrageous!  I&#8217;ll always remember the bottom line, because at the time I was a stay@home mom because of the cost of day care &#8211; it was cheaper for me to stay@home than to work to pay for day care.<br />
So, it makes sense that in the course of a month, 5% off my paycheck will probably net me twice that in savings per month in household expenses for day care, gas and meals out.   Less wear and tear, less stress, and my kids come home to me a couple a times a week &#8211; hey and dinner!  Who wouldn&#8217;t want that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol</title>
		<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/one-option-that-could-save-you-5-on-salaries/comment-page-1/#comment-30731</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrmorning.com/?p=5447#comment-30731</guid>
		<description>No I would not think that management is expecting them to produce less.  Hopefully the employee would recognize the fact that they are saving money.  Gas for the car would be one, not to mention if your not a morning person you can sleep in and start your day a little later. And how many times a week because you are rushed to get out of the house do you not pack lunch and buy fast food?  This would not be a problem if you work from home.  There are certainly a lot more benefits, and I don&#039;t believe that one of them is management is expecting less work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No I would not think that management is expecting them to produce less.  Hopefully the employee would recognize the fact that they are saving money.  Gas for the car would be one, not to mention if your not a morning person you can sleep in and start your day a little later. And how many times a week because you are rushed to get out of the house do you not pack lunch and buy fast food?  This would not be a problem if you work from home.  There are certainly a lot more benefits, and I don&#8217;t believe that one of them is management is expecting less work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PRinVA</title>
		<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/one-option-that-could-save-you-5-on-salaries/comment-page-1/#comment-30720</link>
		<dc:creator>PRinVA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrmorning.com/?p=5447#comment-30720</guid>
		<description>Two days-maybe - Winter, definately!  Most &quot;good&quot; workers get more done at home without the distractions.  I&#039;d go for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two days-maybe &#8211; Winter, definately!  Most &#8220;good&#8221; workers get more done at home without the distractions.  I&#8217;d go for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LorMcK</title>
		<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/one-option-that-could-save-you-5-on-salaries/comment-page-1/#comment-28251</link>
		<dc:creator>LorMcK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 18:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrmorning.com/?p=5447#comment-28251</guid>
		<description>If employees are accepting less pay to work from home, would the subliminal message be that management is also expected them to produce less from home?  Hmmm ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If employees are accepting less pay to work from home, would the subliminal message be that management is also expected them to produce less from home?  Hmmm &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 7/16 queries in 0.016 seconds using disk

Served from: lamp06.pbp.com @ 2010-03-15 05:41:51 -->