HRMorning.com » Proposed legislation changes rules on workplace disabilities

Proposed legislation changes rules on workplace disabilities

July 3, 2008 by Jim Giuliano
Posted in: Disability discrimination, Employment law, In this week's e-newsletter, Latest News & Views

In reaction to controversial court rulings, Congress is fast-tracking some amendments to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), including a clarification on the definition of “disability.”

The U.S. House already has passed the measure by a 402-17 vote, and President Bush has announced his support for the bill.

Among the key components of the legislation:

  • Clarified definition of “disability.” The legislation would clarify the current requirement that an impairment must substantially limit a major life activity in order to be considered a disability.  The amendment adds that the disability “materially restricts” the person - although the legislation doesn’t define “materially restricts.”
  • Exclusion of consideration of mitigating measures. The legislation would prohibit consideration of mitigating measures in determining whether an individual has a disability. For instance, a person with a hearing disability would still be considered disabled even if he or she used hearing aids to substantially lessen the disability. The only exceptions to the exclusion would be ordinary eyeglasses and contact lenses.
  • Expanded definition of “regarded as” disabled. The legislation would provide that an individual is “regarded as” having a disability if the employee establishes that he or she has been discriminated against because of an actual or perceived physical or mental impairment.  The “regarded as” component wouldn’t apply to transitory and minor impairments where the impairment is expected to last less than six months.
  • Same burden-of-proof requirement. After consideration, legislators let stand the requirement that the employee would continue to bear the burden of proving that he or she is a qualified individual with a disability.

If passed as expected, the legislation would go into effect Jan. 1.

Click here to see the full text of the legislation, H.R. 3195.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tags: , , ,

One Response to “Proposed legislation changes rules on workplace disabilities”

  1. Cindy Says:

    An employee was recently sent for a required physical before implementing a respirator policy. He did not pass the physical and additional testing is required. He has been with the company for several years and is paid well above starting pay. The management wants to move him to another part of the factory and cut his pay over $8.00 an hour until additional testing is completed (at the employees expense) and he has satisfactory approval to wear the respirator. By doing this will it go against the ADA act? I can see reassignment of duties, but not the pay cut. I have not been able to find anything on State or Federal sites that specifically talk about this issue. Any information on where to go for regs or similar circumstances will be greatly appreciated.

Leave a Reply


advertisement

    Quick Vote

    • Do you think President-elect Obama’s policies on employment law will:

      View Results

      Loading ... Loading ...

  • advertisement

    See what readers are saying...

    • Gretchen: If you have documented conversations with an employee after they have moved from full-time to part-time because of an in...
    • HR-USA: Whether or not it has "Passed" requirement, I feel it would behove us HR personal and as US citizens to use it. It en...
    • DRUNK-HR: Hey; Show me where those jobs are.. I think it would be hilarious to sit around and "judge" co-workers who get drunk, o...
    • LIBERATEDMOMMY: I see and read it all the time. It boils down to.. Families are made to feel uncomfortable when a spouse chooses to sta...
    • Beth Helman: I also have certain checklists, but not for everything that Lisa King seems to. So, Lisa, I would really appreciate you...
    • Ann: There is some real value to HR sitting in on performance appraisals. While it is time consuming we find we become more ...