<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HR Morning &#187; EEOC v. Maverick Tube Corp</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hrmorning.com/tag/eeoc-v-maverick-tube-corp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hrmorning.com</link>
	<description>Your daily dose of HR</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:08:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>HR&#8217;s e-mail costs firm 175K</title>
		<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/hrs-e-mail-costs-firm-175k/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrmorning.com/hrs-e-mail-costs-firm-175k/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sam Narisi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC v. Maverick Tube Corp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrmorning.com/?p=3488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Retaliation claims against employers have risen sharply in recent years. One way to protect your company: a thorough investigative procedure. Take this recent case: 
An employee complained that his manager made racially offensive comments. The company investigated and fired the supervisor.
But about a month later, the employee was fired &#8212; according to the company, because [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Retaliation claims against employers have risen sharply in recent years. One way to protect your company: a thorough investigative procedure. Take this recent case: <span id="more-3488"></span></p>
<p>An employee complained that his manager made racially offensive comments. The company investigated and fired the supervisor.</p>
<p>But about a month later, the employee was fired &#8212; according to the company, because he threatened to make up  accusations about his new boss if he didn&#8217;t approve a paid vacation request. The employee said he never made the threat.</p>
<p>The company fired him before conducting an investigation. He sued, claiming it was retaliation for the complaints against his former supervisor.</p>
<p>The primary piece of evidence against the company: an e-mail from the HR manager recommending the termination.</p>
<p>After saying the employee should be fired, the HR manager reminded decision-makers that the employee had recently filed a complaint about discrimination. Therefore, the employee&#8217;s lawyers claimed, the firing and the complaints were connected.</p>
<p>The result: Unable to fight the case in court, the company settled for $175,000.</p>
<p><strong>Cite: </strong><em>EEOC v. Maverick Tube Corp.</em></p>
<img src="http://www.hrmorning.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=3488&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrmorning.com/hrs-e-mail-costs-firm-175k/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 8/18 queries in 0.107 seconds using disk

Served from: lamp06.pbp.com @ 2010-03-18 12:27:59 -->