<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HR Morning &#187; participation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hrmorning.com/tag/participation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hrmorning.com</link>
	<description>Your daily dose of HR</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:34:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>A new year, a new push for direct deposit</title>
		<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/a-new-year-a-new-push-for-direct-deposit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrmorning.com/a-new-year-a-new-push-for-direct-deposit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 15:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christian Schappel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter - benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay and benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[direct deposit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[participation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pay option]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[savings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrmorning.com/?p=8266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite the benefits of direct deposit, some workers are still wary of signing up for the pay option. These are the employees you want to work on right now. 
Why? The beginning of a new year is typically when even the most reluctant staffers are receptive to change.
To help boost participation, pass along these facts [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite the benefits of direct deposit, some workers are still wary of signing up for the pay option. These are the employees you want to work on right now. <span id="more-8266"></span></p>
<p>Why? The beginning of a new year is typically when even the most reluctant staffers are receptive to change.</p>
<p>To help boost participation, pass along these facts about direct deposit to skeptical workers:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>They get their money faster. </strong>Employees enrolled in direct deposit get their checks in their accounts faster &#8212; usually around 12 hours faster. That&#8217;s a very convincing point for employees who are living paycheck to paycheck.</li>
<li><strong>They get to save without thinking about it.</strong> Many employees want to put money aside, but simply don&#8217;t have the discipline to do it themselves. With direct deposit, employees can elect to automatically put a set amount of money into a savings account each pay period.</li>
</ul>
<p>To convince its employees direct deposit was a smart idea, a southeastern manufacturing company presented it&#8217;s workers with real-life examples of how the system would benefit them personally.</p>
<p>Example: During a hurricane in the area, some of its employees weren&#8217;t able to get their paper checks on time &#8212; and direct deposit would prevent that problem from happening again.</p>
<p>What are some ways you convinced employees to switch to direct deposit? Let us know in the Comments Box below.</p>
<img src="http://www.hrmorning.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=8266&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrmorning.com/a-new-year-a-new-push-for-direct-deposit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Presenting benefits info to 3 common groups</title>
		<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/presenting-benefits-info-to-3-common-groups/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrmorning.com/presenting-benefits-info-to-3-common-groups/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 17:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christian Schappel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter - benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay and benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[401(k)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automatic enrollment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health-risk assessments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[participation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wellness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrmorning.com/?p=7760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How you present benefits info to employees is just as important as the material that&#8217;s being presented &#8212; and the most successful benefits pros know how to tailor their message to fit the needs of diverse groups of employees.
Here are some common species:
Bottom-liners
These no-nonsense employees don&#8217;t like fluff. So the most effective way to present [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>How</em> you present benefits info to employees is just as important as the material that&#8217;s being presented &#8212; and the most successful benefits pros know how to tailor their message to fit the needs of diverse groups of employees.<span id="more-7760"></span></p>
<p>Here are some common species:</p>
<p><strong>Bottom-liners</strong></p>
<p>These no-nonsense employees don&#8217;t like fluff. So the most effective way to present info to &#8212; or answer questions from &#8212; this group is to be direct.</p>
<p>Concrete examples with tangible facts and figures work well with these workers.</p>
<p><strong>Attackers</strong></p>
<p>These employees tend to be more negative &#8212; they have no problem criticizing company initiatives and programs in public.</p>
<p>If an &#8220;attacker&#8221; comes to you with a gripe about changes you&#8217;re making to one of their benefits, show you care about the person&#8217;s concerns by listening. Then, if necessary, explain how the changes are meant to help them &#8212; or the company &#8212; long term.</p>
<p><strong>Avoiders</strong></p>
<p>These are the employees who want to do only the bare minimum.</p>
<p>They present a challenge to benefits pros who are trying to boost participation in company-wide initiatives &#8212; wellness programs, health risk assessments, 401(k), etc.</p>
<p>The key to success with this group is making things as simple as possible.</p>
<p>Example: Adding automatic enrollment to your 401(k) may be all it takes to boost participation among these workers.</p>
<img src="http://www.hrmorning.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=7760&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrmorning.com/presenting-benefits-info-to-3-common-groups/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>With their savings depleted, will workers participate in your retirement plan?</title>
		<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/with-their-savings-depleted-will-workers-participate-in-your-retirement-plan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrmorning.com/with-their-savings-depleted-will-workers-participate-in-your-retirement-plan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christian Schappel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter - benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay and benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[401(k)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Payroll Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defined benefit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defined-contribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[participation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watson Wyatt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrmorning.com/?p=5904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Workers are finding it harder to save in this economy. Does that mean you can expect fewer employees to participate in your retirement plan? 
Not according to recent trends. 401(k) participation over the past year has remained strong despite the fact that 71% of American workers are now living paycheck to paycheck, a new survey [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Workers are finding it harder to save in this economy. Does that mean you can expect fewer employees to participate in your retirement plan? <span id="more-5904"></span></p>
<p>Not according to recent trends. 401(k) participation over the past year has remained strong despite the fact that 71% of American workers are now living paycheck to paycheck, a <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS157738+30-Sep-2009+MW20090930">new survey</a> by the American Payroll Association has found.</p>
<p>In fact, 82% of workers with access to a 401(k) say they&#8217;re still making contributions.</p>
<p>Of those still contributing, 19% have raised their contribution level and 19% have lowered it since Sept., 2008.</p>
<p><strong>Employees happy with their plans</strong></p>
<p>More good news: The majority of employees (54%) are satisfied with their company&#8217;s retirement plan, and 61% say they view their employer&#8217;s plan as the primary vehicle to save for retirement, according to <a href="http://www.nbj.com/pr_wire/1/423/">recent research</a> from Watson Wyatt.</p>
<p>Another 29% admitted they wouldn&#8217;t save for retirement without it.</p>
<p>Some other findings from the Watson Wyatt survey:</p>
<ul>
<li>More employees (62%) with a defined-benefit (DB) plan are satisfied with their retirement plan than those with only a defined-contribution (DC) plan (51%)</li>
<li>46% of employees say they&#8217;d be willing to pay a higher amount out of their paycheck to ensure a guaranteed retirement benefit, and</li>
<li>52% of employees with a DB plan say their company&#8217;s retirement plan is a key reason they continue to work for their employer &#8212; only 33% of those with a DC plan say the same.</li>
</ul>
<img src="http://www.hrmorning.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=5904&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrmorning.com/with-their-savings-depleted-will-workers-participate-in-your-retirement-plan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Retirement plan participation benchmarks</title>
		<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/retirement-plan-participation-benchmarks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrmorning.com/retirement-plan-participation-benchmarks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Meltzer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay and benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[401(k)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[participation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement plans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrmorning.com/?p=3324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How does your retirement-plan participation rate stack up against other employers&#8217;? 
The expected participation rate may vary not only by your industry but also by your location. On a national level, 52% of employees participate.
 According to EBRI here are the five top and bottom states for retirement plan (defined benefit or defined contribution) participation.
Top 5:

Wisconsin [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does your retirement-plan participation rate stack up against other employers&#8217;? <span id="more-3324"></span></p>
<p>The expected participation rate may vary not only by your industry but also by your location. On a national level, 52% of employees participate.</p>
<p> According to EBRI here are the five top and bottom states for retirement plan (defined benefit or defined contribution) participation.</p>
<p>Top 5:</p>
<ol>
<li>Wisconsin (67.7% participation average)</li>
<li>Iowa (66.9%)</li>
<li>North Dakota (65.8%)</li>
<li>Connecticut (65.0%)</li>
<li>Minnesota (64.1%)</li>
</ol>
<p>Bottom 5:</p>
<ol>
<li>Florida (41.8% average participation)</li>
<li>Arizona (44.3%)</li>
<li>Louisiana (46.7%)</li>
<li>Texas (48.8%)</li>
<li>Nevada (50.3%)</li>
</ol>
<img src="http://www.hrmorning.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=3324&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrmorning.com/retirement-plan-participation-benchmarks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 19/23 queries in 0.011 seconds using disk

Served from: lamp05.pbp.com @ 2010-03-20 23:48:11 -->