<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HR Morning &#187; retirement plans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hrmorning.com/tag/retirement-plans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hrmorning.com</link>
	<description>Your daily dose of HR</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:57:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>2 things you must know about feds&#8217; new retirement advice rules</title>
		<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/2-things-you-must-know-about-feds-new-retirement-advice-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrmorning.com/2-things-you-must-know-about-feds-new-retirement-advice-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 21:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christian Schappel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay and benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Report - Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[401(k)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department of labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial advisors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment advice rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pension Protection Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement plans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrmorning.com/?p=9653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The Department of Labor&#8217;s released new proposed regs on providing advice to participants in individual retirement plans. 
The proposed investment advice rules are intended to make sure that workers receive unbiased advice about how to invest in 401(k)-type plans.
The DOL will be accepting comments on the regs until May 5, and the regs are expected [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2596" title="finance" src="http://www.hrmorning.com/wp-content/uploads/finance.jpg" alt="finance" width="360" height="270" /></p>
<p>The Department of Labor&#8217;s released new proposed regs on providing advice to participants in individual retirement plans. <span id="more-9653"></span></p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/pdf/frinvestmentadvice.pdf" target="_blank">proposed investment advice rules</a> are intended to make sure <span>that workers receive unbiased advice about how to invest in 401(k)-type plans.</span></p>
<p><span>The DOL will be accepting comments on the regs until May 5, and the regs are expected to be effective 60 days after publication of the final rule.</span></p>
<p><span>Here&#8217;s a quick look at some of the key provisions.</span></p>
<p><span><span>According to the proposed rules, investment advice can be given under the Pension Protection Act&#8217;s statutory exemption from liability (which allows employers to hire outsiders to provide investment advice to plan participants), but only if the advice is provided in two ways:</span></span></p>
<ul>
<li><span>through a financial advisor who is compensated on a &#8220;level-fee&#8221; basis, or</span></li>
<li><span>through the use of a computer model that is certified as unbiased.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span><strong>Level fees<br />
</strong></span></p>
<p>The financial services company has to charge a flat fee schedule &#8212; in other words, fees don&#8217;t change depending on what investment options participants choose.</p>
<p><span><strong>Computer models<br />
</strong></span></p>
<p><span>If the rules are adopted, </span><span>computer models used to offer advice would have to be certified in advance as objective and unbiased by an independent expert. </span></p>
<p><span>To comment on the proposed rules, click <a href="http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#home" target="_blank">here</a>.<br />
</span></p>
<img src="http://www.hrmorning.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=9653&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrmorning.com/2-things-you-must-know-about-feds-new-retirement-advice-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>401(k) participation: An overlooked factor</title>
		<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/401k-participation-an-overlooked-factor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrmorning.com/401k-participation-an-overlooked-factor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 13:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Meltzer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay and benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[401(k)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement plans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrmorning.com/?p=3939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most companies focus primarily on employees’ age and income levels when it comes to promoting  enrollment. 
But new research suggests two other factors that may be important in predicting enrollment rates: race and ethnicity.
According to a recent study, white and Asian employees are more likely to participate in their company 401(k) plans than African-American and Hispanic employees earning [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most companies focus primarily on employees’ age and income levels when it comes to promoting  enrollment. <span id="more-3939"></span></p>
<p>But new research suggests two other factors that may be important in predicting enrollment rates: race and ethnicity.</p>
<p>According to a recent study, white and Asian employees are more likely to participate in their company 401(k) plans than African-American and Hispanic employees earning similar salaries.</p>
<p>The study benchmarked the average 401(k) participation rates of employees earning between $30,000 and $59,000 per year. It found:</p>
<ul>
<li>75% of African-American and Hispanic employees participate in the 401(k) plan</li>
<li> 80% of  Caucasian employees do, and</li>
<li>84% of Asian employees enroll.</li>
</ul>
<p>The average employee salary contribution percentage at this salary range was 5.9% for African-Americans and 6.1% Hispanics; compared to 7.1% for whites and 8.4% for Asians.</p>
<p>However, the more 401(k) education employees of <strong>all </strong>ethnic groups receive, the lower the participation gap.</p>
<p>Click <a title="here" href="http://www.arielinvestments.com/content/view/1223/1173/">here</a> for a complete study summary.</p>
<img src="http://www.hrmorning.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=3939&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrmorning.com/401k-participation-an-overlooked-factor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Retirement plan participation benchmarks</title>
		<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/retirement-plan-participation-benchmarks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrmorning.com/retirement-plan-participation-benchmarks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Meltzer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay and benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[401(k)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[participation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement plans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrmorning.com/?p=3324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How does your retirement-plan participation rate stack up against other employers&#8217;? 
The expected participation rate may vary not only by your industry but also by your location. On a national level, 52% of employees participate.
 According to EBRI here are the five top and bottom states for retirement plan (defined benefit or defined contribution) participation.
Top 5:

Wisconsin [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does your retirement-plan participation rate stack up against other employers&#8217;? <span id="more-3324"></span></p>
<p>The expected participation rate may vary not only by your industry but also by your location. On a national level, 52% of employees participate.</p>
<p> According to EBRI here are the five top and bottom states for retirement plan (defined benefit or defined contribution) participation.</p>
<p>Top 5:</p>
<ol>
<li>Wisconsin (67.7% participation average)</li>
<li>Iowa (66.9%)</li>
<li>North Dakota (65.8%)</li>
<li>Connecticut (65.0%)</li>
<li>Minnesota (64.1%)</li>
</ol>
<p>Bottom 5:</p>
<ol>
<li>Florida (41.8% average participation)</li>
<li>Arizona (44.3%)</li>
<li>Louisiana (46.7%)</li>
<li>Texas (48.8%)</li>
<li>Nevada (50.3%)</li>
</ol>
<img src="http://www.hrmorning.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=3324&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrmorning.com/retirement-plan-participation-benchmarks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 8/21 queries in 0.039 seconds using disk

Served from: lamp02.pbp.com @ 2010-03-18 04:39:57 -->