<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HRMorning.com &#187; tax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hrmorning.com/tag/tax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hrmorning.com</link>
	<description>Your daily dose of HR</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:44:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Latest healthcare idea: &#8216;Twinkie tax&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/latest-healthcare-idea-twinkie-tax/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrmorning.com/latest-healthcare-idea-twinkie-tax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Giuliano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urban Insitute]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrmorning.com/?p=3764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amid the arguments over how to pay for healthcare reform comes an old idea in a new package: taxing fatty foods. 
A study released by the Urban Institute and the University of Virginia has caught some lawmakers&#8217; attention, mainly because the study revealed a tax goldmine for funding health care. For example, the study shows [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amid the arguments over how to pay for healthcare reform comes an old idea in a new package: taxing fatty foods. <span id="more-3764"></span></p>
<p>A study released by the Urban Institute and the University of Virginia has caught some lawmakers&#8217; attention, mainly because the study revealed a tax goldmine for funding health care. For example, the study shows over the next 10 years:</p>
<ul>
<li>A 10% excise or sales tax on fattening foods could raise $522 billion.</li>
<li>A 20% tax could raise $937 billion.</li>
</ul>
<p>Not surprisingly,  industry groups strongly oppose the idea.</p>
<p>An organization called Americans Against Food Taxes &#8212; supported by, among others, the National Restaurant Association, the American Beverage Association and the National Grocers Association &#8211;  argues that such taxes are unfair and unneeded.</p>
<p>The Urban Institute study points out that not only would fat-food taxes raise money, but they also would discourage consumption of unhealthy foods.</p>
<p>Industry groups aren&#8217;t crazy about that prospect, either.</p>
<img src="http://www.hrmorning.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=3764&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrmorning.com/latest-healthcare-idea-twinkie-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax deposit rules: When &#8217;safe harbor&#8217; isn&#8217;t safe</title>
		<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/tax-deposit-rules-when-safe-harbor-isnt-safe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrmorning.com/tax-deposit-rules-when-safe-harbor-isnt-safe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 11:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kerry Isberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay and benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrmorning.com/?p=624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alert to your Payroll department:  Remember IRS&#8217; promised &#8220;safe harbor&#8221; tax deposit rule? Well, the promise doesn&#8217;t hold for shortfall amounts to more than $100,000. IRS&#8217; well-known rule says you won&#8217;t be penalized if:

you deposit less than your full tax liability, as long as you make the rest of the deposit on time,
the shortfall isn&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alert to your Payroll department:  Remember IRS&#8217; promised &#8220;safe harbor&#8221; tax deposit rule? Well, the promise doesn&#8217;t hold for shortfall amounts to more than $100,000. <span id="more-624"></span>IRS&#8217; well-known rule says you won&#8217;t be penalized if:</p>
<ul>
<li>you deposit less than your full tax liability, as long as you make the rest of the deposit on time,</li>
<li>the shortfall isn&#8217;t more than the greater of $100 or 2% of the entire amount due, and</li>
<li>you deposit the shortfall by the appropriate make-up date.</li>
</ul>
<p>However, if your shortfall is more than $100,000, the one-day deposit rule applies  &#8212; and overrides the safe harbor.</p>
<p><strong>Multiple deposits may = disaster, too</strong><br />
Watch out: This exception to the rule is also true if you have to make multiple deposits and the shortfalls accumulate to $100,000 or more. The one-day deposit rule applies in this case as well.</p>
<img src="http://www.hrmorning.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=624&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrmorning.com/tax-deposit-rules-when-safe-harbor-isnt-safe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The changes Obama proposes for Payroll regs</title>
		<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/the-changes-obama-proposes-for-payroll-regs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrmorning.com/the-changes-obama-proposes-for-payroll-regs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kerry Isberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay and benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FUTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrmorning.com/?p=397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many of the changes President-elect Obama wants will make a direct hit on your company&#8217;s operations. Here&#8217;s what he&#8217;s proposed during the campaign &#8212; and what&#8217;s likely and unlikely. 
1. Repeal of some Bush tax cuts. Obama favors:

reinstating the pre-2001 top individual tax rates of 39.6% and 36% for families making more than $250,000 ($200,000 for singles)
making [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many of the changes President-elect Obama wants will make a direct hit on your company&#8217;s operations. Here&#8217;s what he&#8217;s proposed during the campaign &#8212; and what&#8217;s likely and unlikely. <span id="more-397"></span></p>
<p><strong>1. Repeal of some Bush tax cuts. Obama favors:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>reinstating the pre-2001 top individual tax rates of 39.6% and 36% for families making more than $250,000 ($200,000 for singles)</li>
<li>making permanent the 10%, 15%, 25% and 28% individual tax rates, and</li>
<li>restoring the personal exemption phaseout and itemized deduction limitation phaseouts at an increased threshold of $250,000 for joint filers ($200,000 for singles).</li>
</ul>
<p> <br />
<strong>2. Higher FUTA wage base.</strong> Employers would have to contribute more into the federal unemployment tax system &#8211; especially those located in states that still have a $7,000 wage base.</p>
<p><strong>3. Changes in healthcare financing. </strong>Although you probably won&#8217;t see a universal healthcare push, employers that don&#8217;t offer or make a &#8220;meaningful contribution&#8221; to the cost of employee health care will probably have to contribute a percentage of payroll toward the costs of a national plan. That could affect employee payroll deductions.</p>
<p><strong>4. Increased payroll taxes.</strong> Maybe you&#8217;ve been hearing reports of additional Social Security taxes, but they likely wouldn&#8217;t take effect for years and they&#8217;d be phased in over a long period. Any such tax would be at a rate of between 2% and 4% (split between employer and employee). It would apply to income above $250,000 and:</p>
<ul>
<li>eliminate the $102,000 ceiling for the Social Security tax, and</li>
<li>create a &#8220;donut hole&#8221; exemption for earnings between $102,000 and $250,000.</li>
</ul>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<img src="http://www.hrmorning.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=397&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrmorning.com/the-changes-obama-proposes-for-payroll-regs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alert to Payroll Dept.: IRS releases 2009 calendar</title>
		<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/alert-to-payroll-dept-irs-releases-2009-calendar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrmorning.com/alert-to-payroll-dept-irs-releases-2009-calendar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 11:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kerry Isberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay and benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Records documentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax deposits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrmorning.com/?p=386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alert your Payroll people: IRS has released its official holiday calendar, indicating when employers get an extra day to make federal payroll tax deposits. 
The official 2009 calendar is the one used by U.S. Office of Personnel Management. Although the schedule is specifically created for federal employees, most employers and banks also follow this calendar. 
Note that when [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alert your Payroll people: IRS has released its official holiday calendar, indicating when employers get an extra day to make federal payroll tax deposits. <span id="more-386"></span></p>
<p>The official 2009 calendar is the one used by U.S. Office of Personnel Management. Although the schedule is specifically created for federal employees, most employers and banks also follow this calendar. </p>
<p>Note that when a holiday falls on a nonworkday &#8212; Saturday or Sunday &#8212; the holiday usually is observed on Monday (if the holiday falls on Sunday) or Friday (if the holiday falls on Saturday).</p>
<ul>
<li>Thursday, January 1, New Year&#8217;s Day</li>
<li>Monday, January 19, Birthday of Martin Luther King, Jr.</li>
<li>Monday, February 16, Washington&#8217;s Birthday</li>
<li>Monday, May 25, Memorial Day</li>
<li>Friday, July 3, Independence Day</li>
<li>Monday, September 7, Labor Day</li>
<li>Monday, October 12, Columbus Day</li>
<li>Wednesday, November 11, Veterans Day</li>
<li>Thursday, November 26, Thanksgiving Day</li>
<li>Friday, December 25 Christmas Day</li>
</ul>
<p>While you&#8217;re filling out your calendar, it might also be helpful to get a copy of IRS&#8217; Publication 509, <em>Tax Calendars for 2009</em> from <a href="http://www.irs.gov/">http://www.irs.gov/</a>.<em> </em>That way you&#8217;ll be sure you never miss a tax deposit deadline.</p>
<img src="http://www.hrmorning.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=386&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrmorning.com/alert-to-payroll-dept-irs-releases-2009-calendar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Higher-paid employees get taxed more for SS in 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/higher-paid-employees-get-taxed-more-for-ss-in-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrmorning.com/higher-paid-employees-get-taxed-more-for-ss-in-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 14:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kerry Isberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay and benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrmorning.com/?p=376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do your higher-paid employees know they&#8217;re going to have more taken out of their paychecks in 2009? Do they know why? 
The Social Security Administration just released its 2009 taxable wage base, which climbs $4,800 over the prior year. That means high-wage earners will pay Social Security taxes (6.2%) on the first $106,800 of their [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do your higher-paid employees know they&#8217;re going to have more taken out of their paychecks in 2009? Do they know why? <span id="more-376"></span></p>
<p>The Social Security Administration just released its 2009 taxable wage base, which climbs $4,800 over the prior year. That means high-wage earners will pay Social Security taxes (6.2%) on the first $106,800 of their income before Payroll can stop withholding those taxes. The Medicare tax (1.45%) has no ceiling. </p>
<p>To put that into real dollars, tell them the maximum Social Security tax employees will pay in 2009 is $6,621.60.</p>
<p> <strong>And for those on the brink of retirement &#8230;</strong></p>
<p> Those nearing retirement may be interested in how much Social Security they&#8217;ll collect each month. The answer depends on what SSA determines is their &#8220;full retirement age.&#8221; For instance, someone retiring in January 2009 at SSA&#8217;s threshold age will receive a maximum monthly benefit of $2,323. </p>
<p>To find help employees figure out their Social Security retirement benefits, direct them to the <a href="http://www.socialsecurity.gov/retire2/agereduction.htm">SSA retirement-planner Web page</a>.</p>
<p> </p>
<img src="http://www.hrmorning.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=376&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrmorning.com/higher-paid-employees-get-taxed-more-for-ss-in-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
