<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HRMorning.com &#187; taxes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hrmorning.com/tag/taxes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hrmorning.com</link>
	<description>Your daily dose of HR</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:44:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Feds take aim at popular fringe benefit</title>
		<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/feds-consider-tax-on-popular-fringe-benefit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrmorning.com/feds-consider-tax-on-popular-fringe-benefit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Meltzer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay and benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fringe benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrmorning.com/?p=2322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Company-issued cellphones are technically considered a taxable fringe benefit, although the rules are rarely enforced. That may change soon, if the IRS has its way. 
 
IRS proposes a crackdown on existing laws that classify employer-issued cellphones as a taxable benefit. The taxes may also apply to text messages on mobile devices, e-mails on company-issued laptops and wireless cards.
Legally, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; line-height: normal;" align="left">Company-issued cellphones are technically considered a taxable fringe benefit, although the rules are rarely enforced. That may change soon, if the IRS has its way. <span id="more-2322"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; line-height: normal;" align="left"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; line-height: normal;" align="left">IRS proposes a crackdown on existing laws that classify employer-issued cellphones as a taxable benefit. The taxes may also apply to text messages on mobile devices, e-mails on company-issued laptops and wireless cards.</p>
<p>Legally, employers are expected to keep detailed records of calls made by employees, in order to show how much of the use is personal and how much is business related. Few companies keep such records for phone calls, and almost none have records to classify text messages or mobile e-mails. </p>
<p>There is also a chance the existing rules could be eliminated rather than enforced. A Senate bill sponsored by  John Kerry (D-Mass.) and John Ensign (R-Nev.) would eliminate the requirement.</p>
<p>IRS has said it is trying to simplify the record-keeping requirement of the law to make it easier for employers to comply. The agency is seeking public comment until Sept. 4.  IRS has suggested three options:</p>
<ul>
<li> Allowing employers to classify 75% of work cellphone use as work-related while paying taxes on the remaining 25 percent%.</li>
<li> Requiring employees to provide proof that they have a personal cellphone to use during work hours, and not taxing the work-issued cell phone.</li>
<li>Letting employers use an IRS-generated statistical sampling to determine the average workers&#8217; personal use of cellphones, and paying taxes on the average. </li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; line-height: normal;" align="left"> </p>
<img src="http://www.hrmorning.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=2322&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrmorning.com/feds-consider-tax-on-popular-fringe-benefit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will feds start taxing health benefits?</title>
		<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/will-feds-start-taxing-health-benefits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrmorning.com/will-feds-start-taxing-health-benefits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Meltzer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrmorning.com/?p=2302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Senate&#8217;s plan to reform the nation&#8217;s health system could include a tax on employer-provided health benefits. 
The plans that would be affected would be those that exceed the value of the standard plan offered to federal employees (currently about $13,000 a year for a family of four). An employer-provided plan worth less than that level would remain [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Senate&#8217;s plan to reform the nation&#8217;s health system could include a tax on employer-provided health benefits. <span id="more-2302"></span></p>
<p>The plans that would be affected would be those that exceed the value of the standard plan offered to federal employees (currently about $13,000 a year for a family of four). An employer-provided plan worth less than that level would remain tax-free,  while any benefit exceeding the cap would be taxed as part of an employee&#8217;s compensation.</p>
<p>Such a tax, if adopted, would likely be phased in over the course of several years.  A higher tax threshold and exemptions for unions would make the tax more politically viable but would diminish the amount of  revenue it would raise to provide coverage for the uninsured.</p>
<p>Last month, a congressional committee discussed repealing the tax deduction allowed for certain large medical expenses or creating a tax on flexible savings accounts and health reimbursement accounts . A more dramatic proposal &#8212; taxing half of all employer-provided health premiums -was also discussed but is unlikely to get out of committee.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, President Obama  has suggested a limit on the value of itemized tax deductions for families earning more than $250,000 a year.</p>
<p>Democrats in both the House and Senate have pushed for government-sponsored insurance for people who have trouble finding coverage through an employer or individually. The idea is adamantly opposed by most Republican legislators.</p>
<img src="http://www.hrmorning.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=2302&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrmorning.com/will-feds-start-taxing-health-benefits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The changes Obama proposes for Payroll regs</title>
		<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/the-changes-obama-proposes-for-payroll-regs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrmorning.com/the-changes-obama-proposes-for-payroll-regs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kerry Isberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay and benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FUTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Payroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrmorning.com/?p=397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many of the changes President-elect Obama wants will make a direct hit on your company&#8217;s operations. Here&#8217;s what he&#8217;s proposed during the campaign &#8212; and what&#8217;s likely and unlikely. 
1. Repeal of some Bush tax cuts. Obama favors:

reinstating the pre-2001 top individual tax rates of 39.6% and 36% for families making more than $250,000 ($200,000 for singles)
making [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many of the changes President-elect Obama wants will make a direct hit on your company&#8217;s operations. Here&#8217;s what he&#8217;s proposed during the campaign &#8212; and what&#8217;s likely and unlikely. <span id="more-397"></span></p>
<p><strong>1. Repeal of some Bush tax cuts. Obama favors:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>reinstating the pre-2001 top individual tax rates of 39.6% and 36% for families making more than $250,000 ($200,000 for singles)</li>
<li>making permanent the 10%, 15%, 25% and 28% individual tax rates, and</li>
<li>restoring the personal exemption phaseout and itemized deduction limitation phaseouts at an increased threshold of $250,000 for joint filers ($200,000 for singles).</li>
</ul>
<p> <br />
<strong>2. Higher FUTA wage base.</strong> Employers would have to contribute more into the federal unemployment tax system &#8211; especially those located in states that still have a $7,000 wage base.</p>
<p><strong>3. Changes in healthcare financing. </strong>Although you probably won&#8217;t see a universal healthcare push, employers that don&#8217;t offer or make a &#8220;meaningful contribution&#8221; to the cost of employee health care will probably have to contribute a percentage of payroll toward the costs of a national plan. That could affect employee payroll deductions.</p>
<p><strong>4. Increased payroll taxes.</strong> Maybe you&#8217;ve been hearing reports of additional Social Security taxes, but they likely wouldn&#8217;t take effect for years and they&#8217;d be phased in over a long period. Any such tax would be at a rate of between 2% and 4% (split between employer and employee). It would apply to income above $250,000 and:</p>
<ul>
<li>eliminate the $102,000 ceiling for the Social Security tax, and</li>
<li>create a &#8220;donut hole&#8221; exemption for earnings between $102,000 and $250,000.</li>
</ul>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<img src="http://www.hrmorning.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=397&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrmorning.com/the-changes-obama-proposes-for-payroll-regs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>They&#8217;re starting their 1st job &#8212; what you need to tell them</title>
		<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/theyre-starting-their-1st-job-what-you-need-to-tell-them/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrmorning.com/theyre-starting-their-1st-job-what-you-need-to-tell-them/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Giuliano</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hiring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[401(k)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orientation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[w-4]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrmorning.com/?p=245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[People who are right out of school need a different type of orientation than someone who&#8217;s walking in the door with 10 years&#8217; experience elsewhere. Specifically, the rookies need help with three major employment issues. 
Health insurance
Someone who&#8217;s never been sick &#8211; or never had to pay the bills for being sick &#8211; probably has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People who are right out of school need a different type of orientation than someone who&#8217;s walking in the door with 10 years&#8217; experience elsewhere. Specifically, the rookies need help with three major employment issues. <span id="more-245"></span></p>
<p><strong>Health insurance</strong><br />
Someone who&#8217;s never been sick &#8211; or never had to pay the bills for being sick &#8211; probably has little understanding of what&#8217;s involved with health insurance, much less the definition of &#8220;deductible&#8221; or &#8220;co-pay.&#8221; </p>
<p>Take a little extra time to explain your organization&#8217;s plan, if you have one, and health insurance in general. No, it&#8217;s not your responsibility to make sure they don&#8217;t make a mistake. Yes, it&#8217;ll make you a better person. </p>
<p><strong>Taxes<br />
</strong>For most new workers, taxes represent something their parents complain about or some mysterious disappearance of part of their paycheck from last year&#8217;s summertime job. Sit with them and go over the responsibilities and realities of filling out IRS Form W-4 and deductions for Social Security, Medicare and state and local taxes. </p>
<p>And if you do a good job of explaining, they&#8217;ll be complaining like their parents in no time at all. </p>
<p><strong>Retirement<br />
</strong>If you come across a 23-year-old who&#8217;s given retirement a lot of thought, you&#8217;re dealing with either (a) the smartest person in the world or (b) the scariest. Most people who are taking on a first job need a primer on 401(k)s and other types of retirement plans &#8211; how they work, who pays for them, and the expected payoff. </p>
<p>What seems to work best is the use of projections. Show newbies what can happen with a regular contribution to a retirement plan and what happens when they don&#8217;t contribute. It&#8217;s true that most of the rookies can&#8217;t imagine the day they turn 60 and their financial needs on that day. All you can do is make them aware.</p>
<img src="http://www.hrmorning.com/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=245&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrmorning.com/theyre-starting-their-1st-job-what-you-need-to-tell-them/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
