Total compensation statements gone bad
June 10, 2009 by Bill MeltzerPosted in: Uncategorized
Total compensation statements are a proven way to show employees the firm invests a lot more in them than just their salaries. But be careful.
The statements can easily backfire – or contain inaccuracies. Here’s how to find and fix two common trouble spots:
1. Avoiding incorrect info
Accidental math errors are the most common – and damaging – problem with total comp statements.
They’re also the toughest for you to spot and correct before the firm sends out the statements, since you aren’t the one who crunches the numbers.
But there are two ways to minimize the risk:
- Make a list of the data sources you use, such as Payroll, your 401(k) provider and health plan carrier, and
- Ask each source to pull and review a few random samples. If they’re OK, chances are the rest will also be fine. But if they contain errors, you can be pretty sure others will have mistakes.
A related problem: Some statements are arranged as a single list of costs, one line after another. To cut the risk of putting something on the wrong line, break the statement down into small sections (e.g., salary, healthcare and retirement). Bonus: This helps make statements easier for employees to follow.
2. ‘Just increase my salary’ syndrome
Sometimes, total compensation statements can actually decrease salary satisfaction, rather than boost morale. A handful of employees may gripe, “Why can’t you just increase my salary instead?” That’s especially true for legally required benefits (like workers’ compensation) and low-profile benefits such as term life insurance. Two fixes that work:
- List “government-required benefits” as a section of the statement. Avoid the term “mandated,” since many employees are unfamiliar with it, and
- Consider adding a section that shows employees how much it’d cost them to line up their own coverage instead.



June 15th, 2009 at 8:17 am
We are in a service industry where hours of work are not set in stone. Does anyone have recommendations on which figure we should use to compute salary in a letter like this – 2080 isn’t the average for most people, so should we use the average over the last 3 months, 6 months, year? I am not sure what would be the best.
June 15th, 2009 at 8:59 am
I don’t necessarily think any period of time would be better than the others for salary average so long as it consistent throughout and unique to the individual. I would suggest using the same time period that you might use for budgeting – make it easy on yourself and your department.
June 15th, 2009 at 2:17 pm
Always use actual hours worked for non-exempt employees. You can get this off of payroll records. I pull hours apart and show base, overtime, holidays, funeral, commissions, paid time off as separate lines and then show the total. For exempt employees, I show base and bonus, since they will always get other paid time off as part of their salary.
June 22nd, 2009 at 9:38 am
We have been thinking about doing comp statements, this article was perfect timing.
November 10th, 2009 at 2:56 pm
We distribute our statements as soon after the end of the calendar year as possible so we use total pay for the prior year for the cash compensation portion.