HRMorning.com » Tougher Homeland Security penalties for employers kick in Mar. 27

Tougher Homeland Security penalties for employers kick in Mar. 27

March 11, 2008 by Jim Giuliano
Posted in: Employment law, Hiring, Immigration, Latest News & Views, National origin discrimination

Be aware: Effective March 27, new, stiffer penalties kick in for employers who don’t follow the latest Homeland Security rules.

You still have time to review your hiring and employment procedures and avoid the new, more expensive penalties that the U.S. Department of Homeland Security has laid out for violations that take place the end of this month.

Here are the violations and the changes in penalties:

Hiring, recruiting and referring undocumented workers.
Old penalties: Fines of $275 to $2,200 per individual for a first offense, increasing to a maximum of $11,000 after two prior violations.
New penalties: Fines ranging from $375 to $3,200 for a first offense, up to a maximum of $16,000 for multiple prior violations.

Employing undocumented workers
Old penalties: Fines ranging from $275 to $2,200 per person for a first offense, increasing to a maximum of $11,000 after two prior violations.
New penalties: Fines ranging from $375 to $3,200 for a first offense, up to a maximum of $16,000 for multiple prior violations.

Unfair Immigration-Related Employment Practices
Old penalties: For unfair immigration-related employment practices, such as discrimination against job applicants or employees based on nationality or citizenship status, range from $275 to $2,200 per act for a first offense, increasing to a maximum of $11,000 after two prior violations.
New penalties: Fines ranging from $375 to $3,200 for a first offense, up to a maximum of $16,000 for multiple prior violations

Form I-9 violations
Penalties remain the same for failure to properly complete the Form I-9 or failure to retain the Form I-9 for the required period of time: $110 to $1,100 per violation.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Tags: , , , ,

Leave a Reply


advertisement

    Quick Vote

    • Which sites do you visit regularly?

      View Results

      Loading ... Loading ...

  • advertisement

    See what readers are saying...

    • Kevin B, HR Manager: I would agree with Denise. Regardless of the employees performance, he needs to be held to the same policies and proced...
    • R. B.: I'm not disabled, so I'm commenting as an outsider looking on and not from personal experience. I would feel much bette...
    • MIKE2: EFCA, which is far more likely to become law under the coming Democrat majority Congress, will notably change the manner...
    • T. L.: Wow, in the midst of some of the worst economic conditions since the great depression (which was also exacerbated by gov...
    • Joe T: Most of the responses have decided that Jerry needs counsel, discipline and/or termination if a behavioral change is not...
    • deb f: Hurrah for Jarek!! Having a close friend in a wheelchair I am thrilled that Mr. Molski is challenging everywhere he goe...