<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When you’re asked for a reference for a problem ex-employee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hrmorning.com/when-you%e2%80%99re-asked-for-a-reference-for-a-problem-ex-employee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/when-you%e2%80%99re-asked-for-a-reference-for-a-problem-ex-employee/</link>
	<description>Your daily dose of HR</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:43:13 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Essie</title>
		<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/when-you%e2%80%99re-asked-for-a-reference-for-a-problem-ex-employee/comment-page-1/#comment-23086</link>
		<dc:creator>Essie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrmorning.com/?p=110#comment-23086</guid>
		<description>How do you tell the new employer that your ex-employee preys on under-18-year-old boys?  He hasn&#039;t been caught and the victims won&#039;t come forward. They are either too embarassed that they fell for the &quot;roofie&quot; in the beer gimmick, or have become so hooked on the free booze and drugs that they won&#039;t squeal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you tell the new employer that your ex-employee preys on under-18-year-old boys?  He hasn&#8217;t been caught and the victims won&#8217;t come forward. They are either too embarassed that they fell for the &#8220;roofie&#8221; in the beer gimmick, or have become so hooked on the free booze and drugs that they won&#8217;t squeal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/when-you%e2%80%99re-asked-for-a-reference-for-a-problem-ex-employee/comment-page-1/#comment-15129</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrmorning.com/?p=110#comment-15129</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a county attorney and we are getting some troubling court opinions about failure to tell prospective employers about former-employees who may be a danger to others.  The law is still unclear about the &quot;danger to others&quot; standard.  &quot;Danger to others&quot; does involve violence and sexual harassment--but only in some circumstances.  Touching is a danger to others; verbal sexual harassment is not.  These are STATE court cases in my state at this time.  I hate to do this to the rest of you, but it might be a good idea to consult your attorney.  If you do not have a company attorney, this is advice you could get from a good labor/personnel/employment law attorney in a half-hour meeting.  Failure to warn can lead to liability in my state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a county attorney and we are getting some troubling court opinions about failure to tell prospective employers about former-employees who may be a danger to others.  The law is still unclear about the &#8220;danger to others&#8221; standard.  &#8220;Danger to others&#8221; does involve violence and sexual harassment&#8211;but only in some circumstances.  Touching is a danger to others; verbal sexual harassment is not.  These are STATE court cases in my state at this time.  I hate to do this to the rest of you, but it might be a good idea to consult your attorney.  If you do not have a company attorney, this is advice you could get from a good labor/personnel/employment law attorney in a half-hour meeting.  Failure to warn can lead to liability in my state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carolene Archuleta</title>
		<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/when-you%e2%80%99re-asked-for-a-reference-for-a-problem-ex-employee/comment-page-1/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>Carolene Archuleta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 21:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrmorning.com/?p=110#comment-216</guid>
		<description>Initially we only give references to prospective employers if they have a signed consent form faxed to us in addition to the signed application that stipulates references.The only information we will release is the name, job title, start date, term date. if they ask if we would rehire this employee we state yes unless the individual is harmful to himself or others and by law we have to divulge the truth. Or face a law suit if the person is harmful to himself or others. In the same instance we had better have proof of the incident we are referring to or face a lawsuit. If the employee trys to sue because we stated this they will loose in a court of law due to the fact we are saving him from himself and others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Initially we only give references to prospective employers if they have a signed consent form faxed to us in addition to the signed application that stipulates references.The only information we will release is the name, job title, start date, term date. if they ask if we would rehire this employee we state yes unless the individual is harmful to himself or others and by law we have to divulge the truth. Or face a law suit if the person is harmful to himself or others. In the same instance we had better have proof of the incident we are referring to or face a lawsuit. If the employee trys to sue because we stated this they will loose in a court of law due to the fact we are saving him from himself and others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: debra</title>
		<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/when-you%e2%80%99re-asked-for-a-reference-for-a-problem-ex-employee/comment-page-1/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>debra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 23:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrmorning.com/?p=110#comment-214</guid>
		<description>I agree with Jim Rittgers - when I initially read the part “If contacted, we won’t be able to give you a positive reference,&quot; that sounded like a lawsuit waiting to happen!  But what constitutes &quot;knowingly malicious?&quot;  Can we let the future employer know that an ex-employee had a lawsuit against us (i.e., labor board, workman&#039;s comp, discrimination, or whatever)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Jim Rittgers &#8211; when I initially read the part “If contacted, we won’t be able to give you a positive reference,&#8221; that sounded like a lawsuit waiting to happen!  But what constitutes &#8220;knowingly malicious?&#8221;  Can we let the future employer know that an ex-employee had a lawsuit against us (i.e., labor board, workman&#8217;s comp, discrimination, or whatever)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Faber</title>
		<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/when-you%e2%80%99re-asked-for-a-reference-for-a-problem-ex-employee/comment-page-1/#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Faber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 19:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrmorning.com/?p=110#comment-199</guid>
		<description>Ohio has a law protecting employers similar to Wisconson and this allows employers to tell the truth to assist the success of the employment screening process as they would want when calling for references.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ohio has a law protecting employers similar to Wisconson and this allows employers to tell the truth to assist the success of the employment screening process as they would want when calling for references.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Rittgers</title>
		<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/when-you%e2%80%99re-asked-for-a-reference-for-a-problem-ex-employee/comment-page-1/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Rittgers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 17:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrmorning.com/?p=110#comment-197</guid>
		<description>I think Mr. Giuliano should reconsider his opinions/comments re: references.  Advising a departing employee that &quot;We won&#039;t be able to give you a positive refernce...&quot; is not a good idea as it gives the employee ammunition for a possible legal action.  I question Mr. Giuliano&#039;s claim that &quot;About half of all reference check problems can be erased before the request is made...&quot;  (I assume in his &quot;Warn employees..&quot; paragraph that he is referring to employees that quit and not those that are terminated, since doing exit interviews with terminated employees is normally not a good practice.  Since the example in his article involves an employee who quit, I&#039;m not confident my assumption is correct.)

&quot;Get a written release&quot; from a departiing employee is not necessary.  It is an employer&#039;s responsibility to obtain a release from candidates under consideration, i.e., I advise prospective employers of my former employees that I require a release before commenting.  Efficient employers have the release included in their employment application form.  When I make reference calls and I&#039;m advised that a release from my prospective employee&#039;s former employer is required, I simply fax the page of the application form that contains the release.

If a terminated emplyee asks me &quot;What will you say if a potential new employer contacts you?&quot;  I ask the departing/departed employee &quot;What are you going to tell potential employers is the reason you are no longer working here?  I never agree to make a false statement regarding a former employee&#039;s departure.

The article should have mentioned that some states have laws that protect employers when giving references.  For example, Wisconsin has had a law (WI Act 441) for 10+ years that protects employers when giving references, provided the information they give is not &quot;knowingly malicious or false.&quot;  A little research in this area would have made the article much more informative/useful.

A misunderstanding of the reference checking process has existed for many years.  This article doesn&#039;t do anything to help reverse the misunderstanding.

Thanks,
Jim Rittgers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Mr. Giuliano should reconsider his opinions/comments re: references.  Advising a departing employee that &#8220;We won&#8217;t be able to give you a positive refernce&#8230;&#8221; is not a good idea as it gives the employee ammunition for a possible legal action.  I question Mr. Giuliano&#8217;s claim that &#8220;About half of all reference check problems can be erased before the request is made&#8230;&#8221;  (I assume in his &#8220;Warn employees..&#8221; paragraph that he is referring to employees that quit and not those that are terminated, since doing exit interviews with terminated employees is normally not a good practice.  Since the example in his article involves an employee who quit, I&#8217;m not confident my assumption is correct.)</p>
<p>&#8220;Get a written release&#8221; from a departiing employee is not necessary.  It is an employer&#8217;s responsibility to obtain a release from candidates under consideration, i.e., I advise prospective employers of my former employees that I require a release before commenting.  Efficient employers have the release included in their employment application form.  When I make reference calls and I&#8217;m advised that a release from my prospective employee&#8217;s former employer is required, I simply fax the page of the application form that contains the release.</p>
<p>If a terminated emplyee asks me &#8220;What will you say if a potential new employer contacts you?&#8221;  I ask the departing/departed employee &#8220;What are you going to tell potential employers is the reason you are no longer working here?  I never agree to make a false statement regarding a former employee&#8217;s departure.</p>
<p>The article should have mentioned that some states have laws that protect employers when giving references.  For example, Wisconsin has had a law (WI Act 441) for 10+ years that protects employers when giving references, provided the information they give is not &#8220;knowingly malicious or false.&#8221;  A little research in this area would have made the article much more informative/useful.</p>
<p>A misunderstanding of the reference checking process has existed for many years.  This article doesn&#8217;t do anything to help reverse the misunderstanding.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Jim Rittgers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 7/18 queries in 0.020 seconds using disk

Served from: lamp02.pbp.com @ 2010-03-22 02:37:57 -->