<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who won this case? Employees banned from dating</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hrmorning.com/who-won-this-case-employees-banned-from-dating/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/who-won-this-case-employees-banned-from-dating/</link>
	<description>Your daily dose of HR</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:43:13 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Judy Buckley</title>
		<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/who-won-this-case-employees-banned-from-dating/comment-page-1/#comment-10706</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy Buckley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrmorning.com/?p=167#comment-10706</guid>
		<description>Our company does not ban dating between employees. We do have the policy that people who begin dating and are in a supervisor/supervisee situation need to be forthcoming about the dating. Then, a different supervisor is assigned for exactly the reasons noted by mw.  We have also had employees who are related to each other, i.e., mother-daughter and husband-wife relationships. In those cases, one of the parties could not supervise the other. As to Stephanie&#039;s post, it does seem unprofessional to &quot;pick up&quot; on guests while they are staying at the hotel where one works. Once they check out, though, good luck trying to enforce a policy that an employee can&#039;t date a former guest. I would think the impact on future business would be slight, if any.  Picture the spurned guest saying he/she wouldn&#039;t recommend the hotel based on the results of the dating relationship. Of course, a really vindictive person could make up things - but that could happen with or without these restrictions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our company does not ban dating between employees. We do have the policy that people who begin dating and are in a supervisor/supervisee situation need to be forthcoming about the dating. Then, a different supervisor is assigned for exactly the reasons noted by mw.  We have also had employees who are related to each other, i.e., mother-daughter and husband-wife relationships. In those cases, one of the parties could not supervise the other. As to Stephanie&#8217;s post, it does seem unprofessional to &#8220;pick up&#8221; on guests while they are staying at the hotel where one works. Once they check out, though, good luck trying to enforce a policy that an employee can&#8217;t date a former guest. I would think the impact on future business would be slight, if any.  Picture the spurned guest saying he/she wouldn&#8217;t recommend the hotel based on the results of the dating relationship. Of course, a really vindictive person could make up things &#8211; but that could happen with or without these restrictions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mw</title>
		<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/who-won-this-case-employees-banned-from-dating/comment-page-1/#comment-3217</link>
		<dc:creator>mw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrmorning.com/?p=167#comment-3217</guid>
		<description>To me, the greatest cause for concern is that this relationship is supervisor &amp; subordinate which could open the door to sexual harassment should the relationship break up.  Peer-on-peer relationships may be cause for concern because of job performance issues, but that can be dealt with under a different venue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me, the greatest cause for concern is that this relationship is supervisor &amp; subordinate which could open the door to sexual harassment should the relationship break up.  Peer-on-peer relationships may be cause for concern because of job performance issues, but that can be dealt with under a different venue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie Benson</title>
		<link>http://www.hrmorning.com/who-won-this-case-employees-banned-from-dating/comment-page-1/#comment-2916</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie Benson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrmorning.com/?p=167#comment-2916</guid>
		<description>I am an HR Manager in the hospitality field. Our policy is that it is unprofessional for the staff  to &quot;pick-up&quot; on the guests while they are staying in the hotel. My question is, can a supervisor prohibit an associate from seeing someone once the guest checks out of the hotel? In my professional opinion, the supervisor cannot; however, one of my supervisors arguments are if the associate dates the guest and things don&#039;t go well, we could lose future business. 

I would love your advice on this subject.

Thank you so much for your time!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am an HR Manager in the hospitality field. Our policy is that it is unprofessional for the staff  to &#8220;pick-up&#8221; on the guests while they are staying in the hotel. My question is, can a supervisor prohibit an associate from seeing someone once the guest checks out of the hotel? In my professional opinion, the supervisor cannot; however, one of my supervisors arguments are if the associate dates the guest and things don&#8217;t go well, we could lose future business. </p>
<p>I would love your advice on this subject.</p>
<p>Thank you so much for your time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 7/15 queries in 0.009 seconds using disk

Served from: lamp06.pbp.com @ 2010-03-18 12:14:31 -->