Human Resources News & Insights

Who won this case? HR thought harassment had stopped

An employee complains that she’s being sexually harassed by her boss. HR jumps into action, the supervisor is disciplined and warned, and, after a short time, the victim tells HR things have greatly improved. But just weeks later, the employee resigns, charging that the supervisor’s gone back to his old ways. She sues for harassment. Did she win?

Read the dramatized version of this real-life case and see if you can determine the outcome.

The scene

“Phil, what’s this mess we’ve gotten into with Sarah Fordham?” asked VP Bill Kurolsky over the phone. “I don’t have to tell you how costly a lawsuit could be. What’s going on over there?”

HR manager Phil Walker sighed. “We have a supervisor who may not be, shall we say, ‘progressive’ when it comes to women,” Phil explained.

“Sarah came to us with complaints that he was being inappropriate and making her uncomfortable,” he said.

“So you were all over him, right?” Bill asked. “You know better than anyone how important a fast response is.”

“Right,” said Phil, “and we saw a fast improvement. We gave him a verbal and written warning, and we met with Sarah a few weeks later and she thanked us for intervening. She even sent us a follow-up email saying the situation was much better.”

“But then she took a leave of absence a month later?” Bill asked.

“Yes, apparently things fell apart somewhere,” said Phil. “I never heard anything more about it, so I thought everything was fine.

“Then Sarah claimed her work environment was worse than ever and that she had to quit her job.”

Sarah brought a hostile work environment and gender bias claim against her employer.

Did the company win?

_____________________________________

The decision

No, the company lost. The court ruled that the HR department’s actions didn’t shield the employer from Sarah’s lawsuit.

The reason: HR didn’t do enough.

The judge acknowledged that the company acted quickly when Sarah expressed concern over the supervisor’s behavior. Officials even went so far as to issue both a verbal and written warning.

But then they dropped the ball.

Once HR heard the situation was better, it failed to follow up to make sure the manager didn’t slip back into his old behaviors – which, in this case, he did.

For that reason, the judge held the employer responsible for the hostile workplace that ultimately led Sarah to resign.

Analysis: One-and-done not enough

Even if your company responds quickly and appropriately to an employee’s accusations of harassment, you could still be on the hook for not going far enough.

If individual department supervisors field a complaint, remind them of the importance of repeated follow-up, even if they’ve been told the matter’s resolved. And, as always, keep a written record of any follow-up as well.

Cite: Aponte-Rivera v. DHL Solutions (U.S.A)

Subscribe Today

Get the latest and greatest Human Resources news and insights delivered to your inbox.
  • Common Sense

    I believe this verdict is wrong. Everyone in this scenario are adults. Why are we coddling the employee at the expense of the employer? The harassed employee obviously new she had an outlet to get the situation corrected, but instead she chose to dummy-up, quit, lawyer-up and sue. How soon and many times and how long is H.R. expected to follow-up on a situation that they believe to be resolved, especially since the employee already reported back that things were better?

  • Bob

    I have to agree with common sense. I think the employee should have went back to HR before lawyering-up. She complained once and things straightened out; but when the harrassment started again she should have taken it right back to HR so that it was documented and they would have had the opportunity to straighten things out before going into a court room.

  • Mary

    I would think the employee should be forced to accept some responsibility in the situation as well. She knew the proper channels to address and refused. “It has started again, boohoo, I’ll have to quit”. She probably “rented a brain” and found out she could sue the company and very likely would win or at least settle for some big amount. I am all for employers being held acountable for negative actions, but the employee should have to “step up to the bar” and take their share of the responsibility.

  • JulieE

    I always wish I knew the whole story. I am just hoping that the offender got fired. I can’t believe that this still happens. Its all over the news so he can’t claim he didn’t know it was wrong! The guy who did the harrassment should be the one footing the bill for the company lawyers not the one who got harrassed!!