• FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
        • SEE MORE
          PREMIUM RESOURCES
  • HR DEEP DIVES
        • Coronavirus (COVID-19) Resources for HR Professionals
          Employment Law
          Labor Law Posting Requirements: Everything You Need to Know
          Recruiting
          businesswoman selecting future employees on digital interfaces
          Recruiting Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
          Performance Management
          vector image of young female making star rating
          Performance Review Resources
          Employment Law
          Understanding Equal Employment Opportunity and the EEOC
          Recruiting
          Onboarding Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
  • CORONAVIRUS & HR

  • LOGIN
  • SIGN UP FREE

HR Morning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
        • SEE MORE
          PREMIUM RESOURCES
  • HR DEEP DIVES
        • Coronavirus (COVID-19) Resources for HR Professionals
          Employment Law
          Labor Law Posting Requirements: Everything You Need to Know
          Recruiting
          businesswoman selecting future employees on digital interfaces
          Recruiting Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
          Performance Management
          vector image of young female making star rating
          Performance Review Resources
          Employment Law
          Understanding Equal Employment Opportunity and the EEOC
          Recruiting
          Onboarding Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
  • CORONAVIRUS & HR
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • More
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Staff Administration
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • Employee Services
    • Work Location
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans

Court: Gender stereotyping doesn't qualify as harassment

Dan Wisniewski
by Dan Wisniewski
September 7, 2012
2 minute read
  • SHARE ON

A heterosexual worker was harassed by his supervisor in the form of anti-homosexual taunts. So why did a court rule in the company’s favor?

Superintendent exposed himself to staffer

Kerry Woods worked as a construction worker for Boh Brothers. Shortly after he began, his superintendent:

  • began referring to Woods as “princess” and “faggot”
  • exposed himself to Woods on a number of occasions, and
  • simulated sexual acts by walking up behind him and miming rude actions.

Woods complained, and his co-workers agreed that though Woods wasn’t homosexual or attracted to men, he was the primary victim of his superintendent’s harassment. No action was taken to curb the superintendent’s actions.
After committing a fireable offense, the superintendent told his own boss that he didn’t like Woods and that Woods didn’t fit in.
Woods was suspended for three days without pay and then moved to another crew, though he was eventually laid off for lack of work.

Same-sex harassment and gender stereotyping

Woods turned around and sued, claiming sexual harassment.
A lower court ruled in his favor, but on appeal the decision was overturned.
Why? The court said there wasn’t enough evidence to prove that Woods was not masculine.
In other words, Woods couldn’t claim he was treated differently and harassed in the way he claimed unless he could show that he shucked the markings of a stereotypical male.
It all came down to the court’s definitions of same-sex harassment and gender stereotyping, said Maria Greco Danaher of Ogletree Deakins.
Citing a Supreme Court ruling, the court said that same-sex behavior that’s covered by anti-harassment and anti-bias law typically involves homosexual proposals of sexual activity or hostility toward gay people.
Neither of those was present in this case.
The court then turned toward another Supreme Court ruling, and found Woods wasn’t covered there either — Woods was decidedly masculine and conformed to society’s general expectations of his gender.
Without evidence to the contrary, a claim of gender stereotyping couldn’t stand.

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS immediately access 10 FREE HR guides.

I WANT MY FREE GUIDES

Keep Up To Date with the Latest HR News

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

Sign up for a free HRMorning membership and get our newsletter!
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • HR Technology
  • Performance Management
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation & Payroll
  • Policy & Culture
  • Staff Administration
  • Wellness & Safety
  • Staff Departure
  • Employee Services
  • Work Location
  • HR Career & Self-Care

HRMorning, part of the SuccessFuel Network, provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day’s headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Privacy Policy Terms of Service
Copyright © 2021 SuccessFuel

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

preloader