• FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
        • SEE MORE
          PREMIUM RESOURCES
  • HR DEEP DIVES
        • Coronavirus (COVID-19) Resources for HR Professionals
          Employment Law
          Labor Law Posting Requirements: Everything You Need to Know
          Recruiting
          businesswoman selecting future employees on digital interfaces
          Recruiting Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
          Performance Management
          vector image of young female making star rating
          Performance Review Resources
          Employment Law
          Understanding Equal Employment Opportunity and the EEOC
          Recruiting
          Onboarding Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
  • CORONAVIRUS & HR

  • LOGIN
  • SIGN UP FREE

HR Morning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
        • SEE MORE
          PREMIUM RESOURCES
  • HR DEEP DIVES
        • Coronavirus (COVID-19) Resources for HR Professionals
          Employment Law
          Labor Law Posting Requirements: Everything You Need to Know
          Recruiting
          businesswoman selecting future employees on digital interfaces
          Recruiting Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
          Performance Management
          vector image of young female making star rating
          Performance Review Resources
          Employment Law
          Understanding Equal Employment Opportunity and the EEOC
          Recruiting
          Onboarding Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
  • CORONAVIRUS & HR
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • More
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Staff Administration
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • Employee Services
    • Work Location
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans

Court: Firing older workers to lower health costs won't cut it

ada, wellness programs
Jared Bilski
by Jared Bilski
December 17, 2014
2 minute read
  • SHARE ON

There are plenty of legal tactics employers can use to lower their healthcare premiums. Firing workers over the age of 65 is not one of them.

That’s what one troubled firm was accused of in Tramp v. Associated Underwriters Inc., a lawsuit that centered around an alleged Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA)  violation.

Background

Back in 2008, Associated Underwriters Inc., was hit with a double whammy: It was not only operating at a loss, it had also experienced a steep increase in its healthcare premiums.
Rather than dropping coverage, Associated went out to get quotes from a number of other insurance providers. To do this, it had to provide demographic info from its employees.
Because of the quotes it received, Associated was under the impression its high premiums were directly tied to the health and age of its workers. Therefore, if Associated could structure its workforce so there were fewer “older, sicker employees,” its premiums would drop, the company reasoned.
So the company underwent a reduction in force in which four employees were let go, including Marjorie Tramp, who was over the age of 65 and who the company claimed was let go for historically poor job performance.
Following the layoffs, the company again went to insurance companies seeking lower premiums and letting the insurers know that “[s]ince last year we have lost our oldest and sickest employees.”
Shortly thereafter, Tramp sued the company for violating the ADEA, claiming she was fired because her age and health were negatively impacting healthcare premiums.

Differs from other court rulings

On appeal, the court sided with the employee and remanded the case to a jury trial. The court said that because Associated Underwriters believed a rise in the age of employees would result in a rise in their healthcare premiums, age and healthcare costs were not “analytically distinct.”
This ruling is noteworthy because it differs from a number of district court rulings that cited a Supreme Court ruling in Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins. In Hazen, the Court ruled that an employee fired to prevent his pension from vesting didn’t have a claim under the ADEA because even though pension status is typically correlated with age, a decision based on pension status isn’t completely “age-based.”
However, in this case, the appeals court said that:

Associated Underwriters’ perception of insurance premiums are not divorced from age in the same sense that pension benefits are divorced from age.

One factor that likely contributed to the court’s ruling: Associated’s comments to insurers about its “oldest and sickest employees.”

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS immediately access 10 FREE HR guides.

I WANT MY FREE GUIDES

Keep Up To Date with the Latest HR News

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

Sign up for a free HRMorning membership and get our newsletter!
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • HR Technology
  • Performance Management
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation & Payroll
  • Policy & Culture
  • Staff Administration
  • Wellness & Safety
  • Staff Departure
  • Employee Services
  • Work Location
  • HR Career & Self-Care

HRMorning, part of the SuccessFuel Network, provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day’s headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Privacy Policy Terms of Service
Copyright © 2021 SuccessFuel

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

preloader