• FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
        • SEE MORE
          PREMIUM RESOURCES
  • HR DEEP DIVES
        • Coronavirus (COVID-19) Resources for HR Professionals
          Employment Law
          Labor Law Posting Requirements: Everything You Need to Know
          Recruiting
          businesswoman selecting future employees on digital interfaces
          Recruiting Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
          Performance Management
          vector image of young female making star rating
          Performance Review Resources
          Employment Law
          Understanding Equal Employment Opportunity and the EEOC
          Recruiting
          Onboarding Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
  • CORONAVIRUS & HR

  • LOGIN
  • SIGN UP FREE

HR Morning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
        • SEE MORE
          PREMIUM RESOURCES
  • HR DEEP DIVES
        • Coronavirus (COVID-19) Resources for HR Professionals
          Employment Law
          Labor Law Posting Requirements: Everything You Need to Know
          Recruiting
          businesswoman selecting future employees on digital interfaces
          Recruiting Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
          Performance Management
          vector image of young female making star rating
          Performance Review Resources
          Employment Law
          Understanding Equal Employment Opportunity and the EEOC
          Recruiting
          Onboarding Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
  • CORONAVIRUS & HR
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • More
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Staff Administration
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • Employee Services
    • Work Location
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans

Employers are the big winners in Supreme Court’s recent ruling

Supreme Court
Christian Schappel
by Christian Schappel
December 10, 2014
2 minute read
  • SHARE ON

Employers have just been given a lot more wiggle room when it comes to what they do and don’t have to pay workers for. 
Employers of hourly workers – especially the likes of Amazon, Apple and CVS Pharmacy – are breathing a huge sigh of relief after the Supreme Court just handed down a landmark ruling that said a group of warehouse workers don’t have to be paid for the time they spend going through security checkpoints after their shifts.
Workers at an Amazon warehouse in Nevada claim they had to wait up to 25 minutes to clear security before they could go home at the end of their shifts. They sued their employer, Integrity Staffing Solutions, which supplied the workers to Amazon, claiming they should’ve been paid for that time.

Was it ‘integral’?

Amazon offered up two arguments against the workers’ claims:

  1. The wait to pass through security was much shorter than 25 minutes.
  2. The security checks weren’t integral to their jobs, therefore the time spent going through the checks wasn’t compensable.

The lawsuit hinged on the second argument.
Federal law says workers don’t have to be paid for activities that occur before or after a shift if they’re not integral to the work they were hired to do.
The employees said the screenings were performed for Amazon’s benefit – as they make sure nobody was stealing product – and therefore were integral to their jobs. That made the time spent waiting to go through the checkpoints and actually undergoing the checks compensable, they claim.
A federal appellate court agreed with them in ruling the workers’ case should proceed.
But the Supreme Court unanimously kicked the appellate court’s ruling — and the lawsuit itself — to the curb.

Court: ‘Not hired to go through security’

Writing for the court, Justice Clarence Thomas said the security screenings were not the “principal activity” the workers were employed to perform.
He wrote Integrity Staffing “did not employ its workers to undergo security screenings, but to retrieve products from warehouse shelves … “
That meant the security checks weren’t “integral and indispensable” to the employees’ work, the ruling said.
The lawsuit would’ve cost Amazon a hefty chunk of change, as it likely would end up having to foot the bill for the extra compensation. Nearly 100,000 workers have had to pass through its security checks, and the lawsuit was seeking extra pay for them all.
Apple and CVS Pharmacy are also facing similar suits and no doubt like what they’ve seen from the High Court on this issue.
Cite: Integrity Staffing Solutions Inc. V. Busk

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS immediately access 10 FREE HR guides.

I WANT MY FREE GUIDES

Keep Up To Date with the Latest HR News

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

Sign up for a free HRMorning membership and get our newsletter!
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • HR Technology
  • Performance Management
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation & Payroll
  • Policy & Culture
  • Staff Administration
  • Wellness & Safety
  • Staff Departure
  • Employee Services
  • Work Location
  • HR Career & Self-Care

HRMorning, part of the SuccessFuel Network, provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day’s headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Privacy Policy Terms of Service
Copyright © 2021 SuccessFuel

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

preloader