MENUMENU
  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
        • SEE MORE
          PREMIUM RESOURCES
  • HR DEEP DIVES
        • Coronavirus (COVID-19) Resources for HR Professionals
          Employment Law
          Labor Law Posting Requirements: Everything You Need to Know
          Recruiting
          businesswoman selecting future employees on digital interfaces
          Recruiting Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
          Performance Management
          vector image of young female making star rating
          Performance Review Resources
          Employment Law
          Understanding Equal Employment Opportunity and the EEOC
          Recruiting
          Onboarding Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
  • CORONAVIRUS & HR

  • LOGIN
  • SIGN UP FREE

HR Morning

MENUMENU
  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
        • SEE MORE
          PREMIUM RESOURCES
  • HR DEEP DIVES
        • Coronavirus (COVID-19) Resources for HR Professionals
          Employment Law
          Labor Law Posting Requirements: Everything You Need to Know
          Recruiting
          businesswoman selecting future employees on digital interfaces
          Recruiting Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
          Performance Management
          vector image of young female making star rating
          Performance Review Resources
          Employment Law
          Understanding Equal Employment Opportunity and the EEOC
          Recruiting
          Onboarding Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
  • CORONAVIRUS & HR
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • More
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Staff Administration
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • Employee Services
    • Work Location
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans

High Court is now in session: Cases you'll want to watch

Tim Gould
by Tim Gould
October 9, 2013
3 minute read
  • SHARE ON

The first Monday in October’s come and gone — meaning the Supreme Court’s back in session. And there are several key cases on the docket that employers will want to keep an eye on.

The best-known case of this term is undoubtedly NLRB v. Noel Canning, in which the justices will decide if President Obama’s “recess appointments” of three federal Labor Board members are valid.
The Obama administration claimed the president used his recess appointment powers to name two Democrats — DOL official Sharon Block and union attorney Richard Griffin — and Republican Terence Flynn during the holidays, when the Senate was supposedly not in session in January, 2012.
But last January, an appeals court in Washington, DC ruled that the Senate was in “pro-forma” session — so Obama’s NLRB appointments were unconstitutional.
The ruling came out of a case filed by Noel Canning, which was challenging an NLRB ruling that the company violated labor law during negotiations for a new collective bargaining agreement with union employees.
Should the Supreme Court decide that the appointments were invalid, it almost certainly means that all actions and decisions coming out of the NLRB between early 2012 and last summer — when Senate Democrats and Republicans struck a deal that officially confirmed new NLRB members — would be wiped off the books.

Sandifer v. U.S. Steel

This case turns on the question of the legal definition of two words: “changing clothes.”  U.S. Steel is a unionized workplace, and under federal law, an employer doesn’t have to pay workers for time spent changing into work clothes, if such a restriction is part of the collective bargaining agreement. U.S. Steel and the United Steelworkers Union had such a clause in their CBA.
A group of steelworkers sued, saying they should be paid for the time they spent getting outfitted for work because they weren’t just “changing clothes,” they were donning protective gear — safety garments that weren’t optional.
A federal appeals court rejected the steelworkers’ argument.
Although this case concerns a union environment, it could have implications for non-union workplaces, too. The FLSA requires workers to be paid for performing a “principal activity” of a specific job, and if the Supreme Court decides that the steelworkers are engaged in such an activity in donning the safety clothing, it could widen employers’ exposure to wage claims.

Harris v. Quinn

This case concerns the practice of non-union workers being required to pay for union representations.
Gwen Morales, Sally Scott and Lindsey Marcus lay out the issue in a Franczek Radelet blog post:

The Supreme Court has long approved collective bargaining agreements that compel non-union members to financially support the costs of collective bargaining representation, as well as other related costs, as long as they are not used to support political candidates or views.
In Harris, a group of in-home health care workers, who, by Illinois state law, are considered state employees for purposes of collective bargaining, elected by majority vote to be represented by a union. The resulting collective bargaining agreement with the state covered workers who had not voted for union representation and required all workers to pay a fair share of union dues.
A group of workers who opposed union representation brought suit, challenging the requirement that they pay union dues as a violation of their First Amendment rights. The case may lead the Court to reconsider its prior decisions requiring all covered employees, not just union members, to pay the portion of union dues that support collective bargaining representation.

 And one for your payroll people …

In United States v. Quality Stores, the Supreme Court will decide whether severance payments made to employees whose employment is involuntarily terminated are subject to federal taxes.
Quality Stores challenged a federal requirement to pay Social Security and Medicare and demanded a refund of the $1,000,125 it had paid in taxes on severance packages for laid-off employees.
The Sixth Circuit held that severance paid to employees on account of an involuntary reduction in force isn’t subject to taxes. That decision created a split among the circuit courts on the issue, leaving the question up to the Supreme Court.

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS immediately access 10 FREE HR guides.

I WANT MY FREE GUIDES

Keep Up To Date with the Latest HR News

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

Sign up for a free HRMorning membership and get our newsletter!
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • HR Technology
  • Performance Management
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation & Payroll
  • Policy & Culture
  • Staff Administration
  • Wellness & Safety
  • Staff Departure
  • Employee Services
  • Work Location
  • HR Career & Self-Care

HRMorning, part of the SuccessFuel Network, provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day’s headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Privacy Policy Terms of Service
Copyright © 2021 SuccessFuel

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

preloader