• FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
        • SEE MORE
          PREMIUM RESOURCES
  • HR DEEP DIVES
        • Coronavirus (COVID-19) Resources for HR Professionals
          Employment Law
          Labor Law Posting Requirements: Everything You Need to Know
          Recruiting
          businesswoman selecting future employees on digital interfaces
          Recruiting Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
          Performance Management
          vector image of young female making star rating
          Performance Review Resources
          Employment Law
          Understanding Equal Employment Opportunity and the EEOC
          Recruiting
          Onboarding Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
  • CORONAVIRUS & HR

  • LOGIN
  • SIGN UP FREE

HR Morning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
        • SEE MORE
          PREMIUM RESOURCES
  • HR DEEP DIVES
        • Coronavirus (COVID-19) Resources for HR Professionals
          Employment Law
          Labor Law Posting Requirements: Everything You Need to Know
          Recruiting
          businesswoman selecting future employees on digital interfaces
          Recruiting Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
          Performance Management
          vector image of young female making star rating
          Performance Review Resources
          Employment Law
          Understanding Equal Employment Opportunity and the EEOC
          Recruiting
          Onboarding Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
  • CORONAVIRUS & HR
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • More
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Staff Administration
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • Employee Services
    • Work Location
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans

Huh? Jury gives employee $27k — but judge OKs $700k in legal fees

Tim Gould
by Tim Gould
January 22, 2014
2 minute read
  • SHARE ON

Here’s a particularly painful example of why companies need to do everything they can to avoid discrimination lawsuits.

United Parcel Service was sued by Kim Muniz, who said the delivery giant had discriminated against her when she was demoted from her position as division manager. A jury found for Muniz and awarded her about $27,000 — about $10k in lost earnings, $7,300 in medical expenses and just under $10k for her “economic loss.”
That’s not the bad part. Muniz sued for attorneys’ fees — and a federal court awarded her almost $700,000. In other words, Muniz was awarded legal fees that were more than 25 times the damages approved by the jury.
It could have been even worse. Muniz originally asked for $1.3 million in fees, along with a “lodestar” punitive multiplier of 1.5 — bringing the total claim to more than $1.9 million.

Demoted two levels

As you might imagine, there are a lot of twists and turns in the Muniz case. Muniz was demoted two levels — from division manager to supervisor — after she allegedly didn’t fulfill the terms of a performance improvement plan. She basically threw the book at UPS, claiming discrimination based on age and gender, and also alleged retaliation and negligent supervision and training.
But most of those claims were either dismissed in summary judgment or voluntarily withdrawn by Muniz.
So only one claim went to trial: the gender discrimination charge, where the company got off comparatively easy with the $27,000 award.
Things got stickier from there.

Court trims bill, but …

The trial court wasn’t about to fork over the $1.9 million Muniz demanded. The judge ruled that Muniz attorney’s hourly charges were too high, and reduced them. What’s more, the court said the attorneys hadn’t proven they’d worked the number of hours they billed for, and reduced the total hours by 20%.
UPS had argued that many of the hours billed were concerned with charges that were later dismissed or dropped — and pointed out that Muniz had achieved only limited success in her legal action against the company. Because of these factors, the court reduced the total by another 10%.
But that still left the bill at $696,162.78. And an appeals court upheld the lower court’s ruling.
The case is Muniz v. United Parcel Service.

Insult to injury

This case is a prime example of how a company can navigate an employee’s bias lawsuit without suffering too much damage — and then get nailed for legal expenses that far outstrip the cost of losing the case.
It’s yet another strong argument for making sure everyone in management is trained in — and acutely aware of the potential costs of — the intricacies of workplace discrimination.

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS immediately access 10 FREE HR guides.

I WANT MY FREE GUIDES

Keep Up To Date with the Latest HR News

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

Sign up for a free HRMorning membership and get our newsletter!
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • HR Technology
  • Performance Management
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation & Payroll
  • Policy & Culture
  • Staff Administration
  • Wellness & Safety
  • Staff Departure
  • Employee Services
  • Work Location
  • HR Career & Self-Care

HRMorning, part of the SuccessFuel Network, provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day’s headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Privacy Policy Terms of Service
Copyright © 2021 SuccessFuel

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

preloader