MENUMENU
  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
        • SEE MORE
          PREMIUM RESOURCES
  • HR DEEP DIVES
        • Coronavirus (COVID-19) Resources for HR Professionals
          Employment Law
          Labor Law Posting Requirements: Everything You Need to Know
          Recruiting
          businesswoman selecting future employees on digital interfaces
          Recruiting Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
          Performance Management
          vector image of young female making star rating
          Performance Review Resources
          Employment Law
          Understanding Equal Employment Opportunity and the EEOC
          Recruiting
          Onboarding Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
  • CORONAVIRUS & HR

  • LOGIN
  • SIGN UP FREE

HR Morning

MENUMENU
  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
        • SEE MORE
          PREMIUM RESOURCES
  • HR DEEP DIVES
        • Coronavirus (COVID-19) Resources for HR Professionals
          Employment Law
          Labor Law Posting Requirements: Everything You Need to Know
          Recruiting
          businesswoman selecting future employees on digital interfaces
          Recruiting Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
          Performance Management
          vector image of young female making star rating
          Performance Review Resources
          Employment Law
          Understanding Equal Employment Opportunity and the EEOC
          Recruiting
          Onboarding Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
  • CORONAVIRUS & HR
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • More
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Staff Administration
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • Employee Services
    • Work Location
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans

Iffy comments enough to trigger ADA obligations? Court says yes

Christian Schappel
by Christian Schappel
October 3, 2014
3 minute read
  • SHARE ON

Here’s the craziest Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) case we’ve come across recently. (Warning: The ruling is a little tough for employers to swallow.) 

Meet John Assaturian, a location manager for Hertz Rent-A-Car’s Honolulu sales department. He was a long-time employee who’d been disciplined for multiple work incidents in which he lashed out at co-workers by yelling, using profanity and pounding his fist on the table.
Eventually, he was diagnosed with chronic ulcerative proctitis and ulcerative colitis, which according to Assaturian affected his bowel control, caused him to lose sleep and was the main culprit in his inability to handle stress. Basically, his medical conditions appear to have made him a very irritable co-worker.
His managers were off site in California, Arizona and New Jersey — as was the company’s HR department, which was located in California.

Dog in the office

This meant Assaturian operated under very little supervision.
As a result, it took nearly a year for Hertz to discover that Assaturian was bringing his dog, Sugar Bear, a Shih Tzu, into his office.
According to Assaturian’s co-workers, Sugar Bear was allowed to roam the office freely, frequently urinating on the floor.
Sugar Bear was eventually discovered when a Hertz manager paid a visit to the Honolulu office. Shortly after, HR phoned Assaturian to inform him that Hertz “had concerns with allowing employees to bring pets to work.”
The comments didn’t go over well with Assaturian, who responded profanely and hung up on HR multiple times. He was, however, able to squeak out the words “anger issues,” “emotions” and “medical condition” while trying to describe what Sugar Bear was doing in the office. He claimed the dog was a calming influence.

Fired for next outburst

A few months after the back-and-forth with HR about Sugar Bear, Assaturian had an altercation with a co-worker, which prompted Hertz to fire him.
Assaturian then sued, claiming his termination stemmed from his disability and Hertz should’ve provided him with some accommodations. He said his firing was a case of disability discrimination and violated a Hawaii law that is nearly identical to the ADA.
Hertz tried to get the case thrown out via summary judgment. It said his termination couldn’t have been discriminatory because it never even knew he was disabled, and he’d never requested an accommodation.
But the U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii — which has a reputation for being very pro-employee — said the case should proceed.
The court’s reasoning? It said a reasonable jury could find that Hertz management knew Assaturian was disabled and his outburst was a symptom of his disability.
In a nutshell, the court ruled it couldn’t conclude that it was Assaturian’s fault the two parties failed to enter the interactive process — in which employers must interact with disabled workers to determine if reasonable accommodations exist that would allow the disabled individuals to perform the essential functions of their jobs. Therefore, the case will proceed.

Needed: Clairvoyance

Any employer that’s been following recent ADA law knows employees don’t have to say the words “disability” or “accommodation” to trigger the interactive process obligations under the ADA.
But this case is as close as we’ve seen a court get to telling employers they need to essentially read the minds of their workers.
Basically, what the U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii is telling employers is this: Any mention of an “issue” or “condition” could be enough to trigger obligations under the ADA and similar state laws.
Oh, and remember, it’s not just HR that needs to be clairvoyant — your managers need to develop this skill as well.
Cite: Assaturian v. Hertz Corp.

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS immediately access 10 FREE HR guides.

I WANT MY FREE GUIDES

Keep Up To Date with the Latest HR News

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

Sign up for a free HRMorning membership and get our newsletter!
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • HR Technology
  • Performance Management
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation & Payroll
  • Policy & Culture
  • Staff Administration
  • Wellness & Safety
  • Staff Departure
  • Employee Services
  • Work Location
  • HR Career & Self-Care

HRMorning, part of the SuccessFuel Network, provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day’s headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Privacy Policy Terms of Service
Copyright © 2021 SuccessFuel

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

preloader