MENUMENU
  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
        • SEE MORE
          PREMIUM RESOURCES
  • HR DEEP DIVES
        • Coronavirus (COVID-19) Resources for HR Professionals
          Employment Law
          Labor Law Posting Requirements: Everything You Need to Know
          Recruiting
          businesswoman selecting future employees on digital interfaces
          Recruiting Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
          Performance Management
          vector image of young female making star rating
          Performance Review Resources
          Employment Law
          Understanding Equal Employment Opportunity and the EEOC
          Recruiting
          Onboarding Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
  • CORONAVIRUS & HR

  • LOGIN
  • SIGN UP FREE

HR Morning

MENUMENU
  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
        • SEE MORE
          PREMIUM RESOURCES
  • HR DEEP DIVES
        • Coronavirus (COVID-19) Resources for HR Professionals
          Employment Law
          Labor Law Posting Requirements: Everything You Need to Know
          Recruiting
          businesswoman selecting future employees on digital interfaces
          Recruiting Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
          Performance Management
          vector image of young female making star rating
          Performance Review Resources
          Employment Law
          Understanding Equal Employment Opportunity and the EEOC
          Recruiting
          Onboarding Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
  • CORONAVIRUS & HR
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • More
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Staff Administration
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • Employee Services
    • Work Location
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans

Pre-hire testing: A growing trend, a potential legal minefield

Tim Gould
by Tim Gould
September 18, 2013
4 minute read
  • SHARE ON

Is pre-hire testing worth the time, expense and legal risk? You know the answer: It depends on what you’re trying to find out, and why.

A SHRM survey from a couple of years ago said about one in five employers administer a standard personality test; seven out of 10 HR pros said the exams were useful in determining whether or not a candidate would be a good cultural “fit.”
Nowadays, however, many companies are looking for information that’s a little more in-depth. And that’s where things can get tricky.
Condon McGlothlen, writing on the Employment Law Lookout blog, recently put together a comprehensive two-part analysis on applicant testing. What follows is a sampling of what he had to say.

Some easy calls

It’s a no-brainer to test applicants for some positions, McGlothen said. Call center employees are a good example: These jobs often draw a large number of applicants, many of whom have basic qualifications. Faced with a deluge of people with the same basic attributes, this makes it necessary for employers to find a tool in addition to an application form, a resume, and a 10-minute interview to identify top candidates.
Even here, though, there’s a caveat: Some call center jobs involve only receiving inbound calls and answering customer questions, writes McGlothlen. Other call center jobs are essentially sales jobs: They involve outbound calling, and they require persistence and resilience; they could involve a scripted sales pitch, but they could also involve unscripted dialogue and require people with an outgoing personality and a certain “marketing flair.”
In other words, employers shouldn’t assume seemingly similar jobs are alike — and test for just one set of attributes.

Dealing with vendors

There’s been a growing trend in recent years of organizations testing applicants (and current employees) for “deeper” info on what makes them tick — things like readiness (and willingness) to take on management assignments, attention to detail and whether they’re “big picture” thinkers.
For that type of testing, companies need to turn to vendors. Here’s McGlothlen’s advice on navigating that potentially dangerous path:
First, get beyond the sales reps. Most are uniformed about federal laws concerning hiring; you need to talk to someone in the firm who knows what’s legal and what’s not.
Here’s the key, via McGlothlen:

Unless a test has been validated for a particular employer’s specific job, the test is not valid as to that job, i.e., it isn’t valid for the hiring employer’s purposes. Any reputable vendor has industrial or organizational psychologists on staff who know what validity means, whether the vendor’s instruments have been properly validated for other employers, and what it would take to validate the test at issue for the purchasing employer. Ask to speak with the organizational psychologist on staff.
That a test has been validated for other companies, perhaps in other industries, for use in filling positions that may or may not resemble the jobs in question, typically means nothing.

There’s also a question of who should validate the test — meaning making sure there’s a clear connection between success on the test and success on the job. Some large employers considering a test or multiple tests have the luxury of “in-house” experts. Others hire outside consultants.

Legal issues lurk

With testing comes legal dangers. The question, then, McGlothlen writes, is

… how best to manage that risk and at the same time enable the employer to choose the most qualified candidate(s) in a cost-effective manner.
Should the test be given early in the hiring process to all or most candidates? A test given early on will screen out more applicants or potential applicants – perhaps hundreds instead of a handful. However, individuals rejected at pre-interview stage typically don’t know why they were rejected, and are thus less likely to file a charge or bring suit challenging the test’s validity. These individuals may have applied to dozens of companies, and may or may not view the position in question as their “dream job” (or at least their job of choice).
By contrast, the candidate who fails a test late in the hiring process will likely know (or have a good sense of) why she was rejected. If she feels the test was biased or the testing process was otherwise unfair, she’ll be more likely to make a legal stink – not only because she knows, or thinks she knows, why she was rejected, but also because she’ll have invested more time, energy, emotion and thought into the job in question as compared to someone rejected earlier in the process.

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS immediately access 10 FREE HR guides.

I WANT MY FREE GUIDES

Keep Up To Date with the Latest HR News

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

Sign up for a free HRMorning membership and get our newsletter!
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • HR Technology
  • Performance Management
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation & Payroll
  • Policy & Culture
  • Staff Administration
  • Wellness & Safety
  • Staff Departure
  • Employee Services
  • Work Location
  • HR Career & Self-Care

HRMorning, part of the SuccessFuel Network, provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day’s headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Privacy Policy Terms of Service
Copyright © 2021 SuccessFuel

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

preloader