MENUMENU
  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
        • SEE MORE
          PREMIUM RESOURCES
  • HR DEEP DIVES
        • Coronavirus (COVID-19) Resources for HR Professionals
          Employment Law
          Labor Law Posting Requirements: Everything You Need to Know
          Recruiting
          businesswoman selecting future employees on digital interfaces
          Recruiting Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
          Performance Management
          vector image of young female making star rating
          Performance Review Resources
          Employment Law
          Understanding Equal Employment Opportunity and the EEOC
          Recruiting
          Onboarding Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
  • CORONAVIRUS & HR

  • LOGIN
  • SIGN UP FREE

HR Morning

MENUMENU
  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
        • SEE MORE
          PREMIUM RESOURCES
  • HR DEEP DIVES
        • Coronavirus (COVID-19) Resources for HR Professionals
          Employment Law
          Labor Law Posting Requirements: Everything You Need to Know
          Recruiting
          businesswoman selecting future employees on digital interfaces
          Recruiting Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
          Performance Management
          vector image of young female making star rating
          Performance Review Resources
          Employment Law
          Understanding Equal Employment Opportunity and the EEOC
          Recruiting
          Onboarding Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
  • CORONAVIRUS & HR
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • More
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Staff Administration
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • Employee Services
    • Work Location
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans

Six new rulings show how NLRB's leaning on social media use

Dan Wisniewski
by Dan Wisniewski
January 30, 2012
3 minute read
  • SHARE ON

Is the NLRB finally hammering out a sensible approach to social media?
Since the National Labor Relations Board got involved in a Facebook firing case in 2010, firms have been questioning just how and when it’s OK to discipline and fire staff for comments made on social media.
Recently, the agency released six new advice memoranda on cases involving staffers who were fired for social media comments.
Each case involves employees who filed complaints with the agency alleging that they were illegally fired for online comments.
How the NLRB ruled in each case stands as (mostly) good news for companies moving forward.
Policy was overbroad
Let’s start with the only losing case for a company, which comes from wire service Thomson Reuters.
The firm encouraged staff to post on its Twitter feed about how Reuters could create a better workplace. An employee responded that one way would be to “to deal honestly with Guild members.”
The next day the employee got a phone call from the bureau chief reminding her that the firm’s social media policy prohibited posts that damaged the company’s reputation.
Though the staffer wasn’t formally disciplined, she refrained from Tweeting again – and then complained to the NLRB, who ruled in her favor.
The agency said the firm’s policy of prohibiting employees from damaging the company’s reputation online without providing examples or limitations of what staffers could and couldn’t post could prevent staff from engaging in protected activity.
Employee discussion not protected
The next noteworthy case involved a therapist who complained on her Facebook wall about staff meetings.
Along with a co-worker, she complained about the meeting on Facebook. Her actions got her fired.
Yet, the NLRB ruled in favor of the company here.
Wait – isn’t this that a perfect example of employees using social media to discuss work conditions?
Not quite. The NLRB found that even though the therapist interacted with a co-worker online, neither person was trying to change the terms and conditions of the workplace – nd that meant she wasn’t protected.
The ruling suggests that just because two or more employees discuss work online doesn’t guarantee the discussion’s protected.
Instead, moving forward, it appears the agency will examine not just the original post made by an employee but also the reactions of colleagues to that post and how they interpreted it.
4 additional cases
The NLRB also ruled on four other cases, all in favor of the companies.
Why? Each of these cases involved a simple personal gripe – and that’s not protected, according the agency:

  • A respiratory therapist was fired for updating her Facebook status during an ambulance ride to complain about her co-worker, who was sucking on her teeth.
  • A bank teller was fired after she complained on Facebook that co-workers had complained about her performance to her supervisor.
  • A nurse posted on a co-worker’s Facebook asking if a manager was still “making life miserable.” When the manager found out, he fired her.
  • An accountant made a Facebook post falsely claiming that her firm engaged in fraudulent accounting practices and was fired when she refused to remove the post. The agency said that although the original post might have been seeking group activity, refusing to remove it after learning it was false meant she was no longer protected.

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS immediately access 10 FREE HR guides.

I WANT MY FREE GUIDES

Keep Up To Date with the Latest HR News

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

Sign up for a free HRMorning membership and get our newsletter!
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • HR Technology
  • Performance Management
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation & Payroll
  • Policy & Culture
  • Staff Administration
  • Wellness & Safety
  • Staff Departure
  • Employee Services
  • Work Location
  • HR Career & Self-Care

HRMorning, part of the SuccessFuel Network, provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day’s headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Privacy Policy Terms of Service
Copyright © 2021 SuccessFuel

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

preloader