• FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
        • SEE MORE
          PREMIUM RESOURCES
  • HR DEEP DIVES
        • Coronavirus (COVID-19) Resources for HR Professionals
          Employment Law
          Labor Law Posting Requirements: Everything You Need to Know
          Recruiting
          businesswoman selecting future employees on digital interfaces
          Recruiting Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
          Performance Management
          vector image of young female making star rating
          Performance Review Resources
          Employment Law
          Understanding Equal Employment Opportunity and the EEOC
          Recruiting
          Onboarding Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
  • CORONAVIRUS & HR

  • LOGIN
  • SIGN UP FREE

HR Morning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
        • SEE MORE
          PREMIUM RESOURCES
  • HR DEEP DIVES
        • Coronavirus (COVID-19) Resources for HR Professionals
          Employment Law
          Labor Law Posting Requirements: Everything You Need to Know
          Recruiting
          businesswoman selecting future employees on digital interfaces
          Recruiting Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
          Performance Management
          vector image of young female making star rating
          Performance Review Resources
          Employment Law
          Understanding Equal Employment Opportunity and the EEOC
          Recruiting
          Onboarding Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
  • CORONAVIRUS & HR
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • More
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Staff Administration
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • Employee Services
    • Work Location
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans

Staffer disagreement led to poisoning? Really?

Dan Wisniewski
by Dan Wisniewski
February 26, 2014
2 minute read
  • SHARE ON

And you thought your employees’ squabbles were hard to deal with.  
Nursefinders is a staffing company that provides pre-screened nurses and medical personnel to hospitals and other facilities.
The company hired Theresa Drummond and assigned her to work at a Kaiser facility as a medical assistant.
At some point, Drummond and colleague Sara Montague had a disagreement at work regarding how rooms were to be stocked. Drummond and Montague later had a discussion regarding misplaced lab slips where Drummond raised her voice. Montague didn’t consider either argument serious enough to report to a supervisor.
Drummond, on the other hand, must have been a bit more frustrated, because several weeks later she responded by pouring carbolic acid into Montague’s water bottle. When Montague drank from it, her tongue and throat started to burn, and she vomited.

Could it possible have been Nursefinders’ fault?

Montague then sued Nursefinders, claiming the company was vicariously responsible for Drummond’s actions.
The court didn’t quite agree, though it did take an interesting approach to ruling on the case.
First, Montague claimed that Nursefinders had a duty to train its employees on how to handle workplace disputes (presumably not by poisoning) and to not engage in workplace violence — and the court agreed.
However, with that in mind, the court found that Nursefinders did, in fact, provide such training. Nursefinders trained Drummond on Kaiser’s policies and procedures on “violence in the workplace” and “management of threats and aggressive behavior.” And Nursefinders’ own orientation covered workplace violence as well.
Second, the court found that Nursefinders, as a staffing placement company, couldn’t be held responsible for something that happened between two employees at Kaiser.
The folks at Shaw Valenza had a quick takeaway from the case on their blog:

So, the takeaway is that employers should conduct workplace violence training to avoid the argument that lack of training could result in an employee’s not knowing it’s wrong to poison a co-worker’s water.

The case is Montague v. AMN Healthcare.

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS immediately access 10 FREE HR guides.

I WANT MY FREE GUIDES

Keep Up To Date with the Latest HR News

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

Sign up for a free HRMorning membership and get our newsletter!
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • HR Technology
  • Performance Management
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation & Payroll
  • Policy & Culture
  • Staff Administration
  • Wellness & Safety
  • Staff Departure
  • Employee Services
  • Work Location
  • HR Career & Self-Care

HRMorning, part of the SuccessFuel Network, provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day’s headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Privacy Policy Terms of Service
Copyright © 2021 SuccessFuel

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

preloader