MENUMENU
  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
        • SEE MORE
          PREMIUM RESOURCES
  • HR DEEP DIVES
        • Coronavirus (COVID-19) Resources for HR Professionals
          Employment Law
          Labor Law Posting Requirements: Everything You Need to Know
          Recruiting
          businesswoman selecting future employees on digital interfaces
          Recruiting Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
          Performance Management
          vector image of young female making star rating
          Performance Review Resources
          Employment Law
          Understanding Equal Employment Opportunity and the EEOC
          Recruiting
          Onboarding Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
  • CORONAVIRUS & HR

  • LOGIN
  • SIGN UP FREE

HR Morning

MENUMENU
  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
        • SEE MORE
          PREMIUM RESOURCES
  • HR DEEP DIVES
        • Coronavirus (COVID-19) Resources for HR Professionals
          Employment Law
          Labor Law Posting Requirements: Everything You Need to Know
          Recruiting
          businesswoman selecting future employees on digital interfaces
          Recruiting Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
          Performance Management
          vector image of young female making star rating
          Performance Review Resources
          Employment Law
          Understanding Equal Employment Opportunity and the EEOC
          Recruiting
          Onboarding Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
  • CORONAVIRUS & HR
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • More
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Staff Administration
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • Employee Services
    • Work Location
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans

Why the latest social media ruling signifies a growing, dangerous trend

Dan Wisniewski
by Dan Wisniewski
September 25, 2013
3 minute read
  • SHARE ON

The latest ruling on a social media debacle will only directly affect public employers — for now. Here’s why HR pros at private firms should be paying attention, too. 
A new court ruling says that “liking” a Facebook post is protected speech under the First Amendment. That could mean headaches for HR pros in private companies down the road. How? Read on.
First, here are the details of the case:
A sheriff in Hampton, VA, was running for reelection. The problem? His direct reports refused to support him — and actually actively expressed support for his opponent.
You can guess how well that turned out when the sheriff was reelected. He opted to take out his frustrations with his staffers by refusing to reappoint them.
The former staffers turned right around and sued, claiming the sheriff violated their right to free speech under the First Amendment.

What’s the value of a ‘like?’

The former workers expressed their discontent in a number of ways during the reelection campaign, but the most relevant here is via “liking” the sheriff’s opponent’s Facebook page.
A district court ruled that “liking” someone’s Facebook page is “insufficient to merit constitutional protection.” But the appeals court thought otherwise, saying that it’s protected just as much as any written word.
Why? Several things happened as a result of “liking” the sheriff’s opponent’s Facebook page:

  1. The opposing candidate’s name and picture were added to each employee’s profile so that other Facebook users could see it
  2. Facebook issued a notification that each staffer had liked the candidate’s campaign page, and
  3. Each worker’s name and photo were added to the candidate’s “People Who Like This” list.

The Court noted that:

On the most basic level, clicking on the “like” button literally causes to be published the statement that the User “likes” something, which is itself a substantive statement. That a user may use a single mouse click to produce that message that he likes the page instead of typing the same message with several individual key strokes is of no constitutional significance.”

The court also added that “liking” someone’s page is “the Internet equivalent of displaying a political sign in one’s front yard, which the Supreme Court has held is substantive speech.”

What’s the social media landscape ‘like’ now for firms?

Yes, this ruling will only directly affect public employers for the time being.
But many experts, including Sara H. Jodka of Porter, Wright, Morris & Arhtur LLP, say it’s not long until a similar case plays out in the private sector:

Private sector employers have seen a similar issue play out before the National Labor Relations Board where an employee’s Facebook post about terms or conditions of employment has been considered protected activity under the National Labor Relations Act based largely on whether the post generated co-workers’ positive comments in response and “Likes.” Therefore, private sector employers likely can expect that any discipline to the original poster and those who “liked” the post would be found to be an unfair labor practice under those circumstances. Similarly, clicking “Like” in response to a co-worker’s complaint on Facebook about race discrimination in the workplace likely would be considered protected activity in the Title VII context.
Employers, whether public or private, … should not be so quick to pull the trigger on a termination based solely on this kind of symbolic speech on social media.

Though it isn’t made explicitly clear in the case, the ruling suggests that private firms can’t fire someone for “liking” a page that a company doesn’t agree with.
The case is Bland v. Roberts.

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS immediately access 10 FREE HR guides.

I WANT MY FREE GUIDES

Keep Up To Date with the Latest HR News

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

Sign up for a free HRMorning membership and get our newsletter!
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • HR Technology
  • Performance Management
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation & Payroll
  • Policy & Culture
  • Staff Administration
  • Wellness & Safety
  • Staff Departure
  • Employee Services
  • Work Location
  • HR Career & Self-Care

HRMorning, part of the SuccessFuel Network, provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day’s headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Privacy Policy Terms of Service
Copyright © 2021 SuccessFuel

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

preloader