MENUMENU
  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
        • SEE MORE
          PREMIUM RESOURCES
  • HR DEEP DIVES
        • Coronavirus (COVID-19) Resources for HR Professionals
          Employment Law
          Labor Law Posting Requirements: Everything You Need to Know
          Recruiting
          businesswoman selecting future employees on digital interfaces
          Recruiting Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
          Performance Management
          vector image of young female making star rating
          Performance Review Resources
          Employment Law
          Understanding Equal Employment Opportunity and the EEOC
          Recruiting
          Onboarding Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
  • CORONAVIRUS & HR

  • LOGIN
  • SIGN UP FREE

HR Morning

MENUMENU
  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
        • SEE MORE
          PREMIUM RESOURCES
  • HR DEEP DIVES
        • Coronavirus (COVID-19) Resources for HR Professionals
          Employment Law
          Labor Law Posting Requirements: Everything You Need to Know
          Recruiting
          businesswoman selecting future employees on digital interfaces
          Recruiting Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
          Performance Management
          vector image of young female making star rating
          Performance Review Resources
          Employment Law
          Understanding Equal Employment Opportunity and the EEOC
          Recruiting
          Onboarding Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
  • CORONAVIRUS & HR
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • More
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Staff Administration
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • Employee Services
    • Work Location
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans

Huh? NLRB rules it was OK for employee to lie during workplace investigation

Tim Gould
by Tim Gould
October 5, 2012
3 minute read
  • SHARE ON

The National Labor Relations Board strikes again. Now it wants to control how employers handle offensive and threatening language in the workplace — and says that sometimes, employees have a right to lie to their superiors.
The NLRB recently ruled that Fresenius USA Manufacturing,  violated the National Labor Relations Act by firing an employee who wrote “vulgar, offensive and threatening” statements on union newsletters left in a workers’ break room and then lied to management in a subsequent investigation.
The background: Fresenius employees voted to unionize two units at its
Chester, NY facility: drivers and warehouse workers. After a year, however, the union and the company hadn’t been able to agree on a collective-bargaining agreement for either unit.
At that point, a warehouse employee filed a decertification petition for the warehouse unit. In the midst of the decertification campaign, three union newsletters — with handwritten comments across the front — appeared in an employee break room.
The statements: “Dear Pussies, Please Read!”, “Hey cat food lovers” (an apparent reference to the ‘pussies’ remark), “how’s your income doing?”, and “Warehouse workers, RIP”.

Complaints filed

Several female employees complained to management that the comments were vulgar, offensive and threatening.
Fresenius officials investigated, and the evidence pointed to vocal union supporter Kevin “Dale” Grosso. Grosso denied any involvement in writing the offensive comments.
The next day, however, Grosso attempted to call a union rep to discuss his being questioned by management. But he misdialed the phone — and got a company vice president instead. Mistaking the VP for his union rep, Grosso admitted he had written the comments on the union newsletters.
After a review session with HR, Grosso was fired. Two reasons were given: His comments on the newsletters and his dishonesty during the investigation.

Employee had right ‘not to respond truthfully’

When the case came before the NLRB, the board agreed with an earlier administrative law judge’s finding that Fresenius investigation of the offensive comments and subsequent questioning of Grosso didn’t violate labor laws.
“Employers have a legitimate interest in investigating facially valid complaints of employee misconduct, including complaints of harassment,” the Board wrote.
But here’s the kick in the head for employers: The Board ruled that Fresenius violated the NLRA by terminating Grosso for writing the comments on the  newsletters.
“Grosso’s handwritten comments encouraged warehouse employees to support the Union in the decertification election … in writing (the comments), Grosso was engaged in protected union activity.”
But what about his lying to his superiors during the investigation? Here’s what the NLRB said: “Fresenius’ questioning of Grosso put him in the position of having to reveal his protected activity,” which is prohibited when “the inquiry is unrelated to the employee’s job performance or the employer’s ability to operate its business …
“(A)lthough Fresenius had a legitimate interest in questioning Grosso … Grosso had a right (under federal labor law) not to respond truthfully.”
The conclusion: In the midst of a union organizing drive, employees have carte blanche to lie to their employers during legitimate workplace investigations. And that further erodes employers’ ability to manage workplace conditions — like barring profanity among workers.
The NLRB marches on.
 
 

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS immediately access 10 FREE HR guides.

I WANT MY FREE GUIDES

Keep Up To Date with the Latest HR News

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

Sign up for a free HRMorning membership and get our newsletter!
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • HR Technology
  • Performance Management
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation & Payroll
  • Policy & Culture
  • Staff Administration
  • Wellness & Safety
  • Staff Departure
  • Employee Services
  • Work Location
  • HR Career & Self-Care

HRMorning, part of the SuccessFuel Network, provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day’s headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Privacy Policy Terms of Service
Copyright © 2021 SuccessFuel

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

preloader