• FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
        • SEE MORE
          PREMIUM RESOURCES
  • HR DEEP DIVES
        • Coronavirus (COVID-19) Resources for HR Professionals
          Employment Law
          Labor Law Posting Requirements: Everything You Need to Know
          Recruiting
          businesswoman selecting future employees on digital interfaces
          Recruiting Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
          Performance Management
          vector image of young female making star rating
          Performance Review Resources
          Employment Law
          Understanding Equal Employment Opportunity and the EEOC
          Recruiting
          Onboarding Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
  • CORONAVIRUS & HR

  • LOGIN
  • SIGN UP FREE

HR Morning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
        • SEE MORE
          PREMIUM RESOURCES
  • HR DEEP DIVES
        • Coronavirus (COVID-19) Resources for HR Professionals
          Employment Law
          Labor Law Posting Requirements: Everything You Need to Know
          Recruiting
          businesswoman selecting future employees on digital interfaces
          Recruiting Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
          Performance Management
          vector image of young female making star rating
          Performance Review Resources
          Employment Law
          Understanding Equal Employment Opportunity and the EEOC
          Recruiting
          Onboarding Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
  • CORONAVIRUS & HR
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • More
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Staff Administration
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • Employee Services
    • Work Location
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans

Is putting worker on paid leave grounds for retaliation suit?

Tim Gould
by Tim Gould
November 16, 2010
2 minute read
  • SHARE ON

Federal courts haven’t exactly been clear on what qualifies as an “adverse action” on an employer’s part when it come to retaliation claims. So a recent ruling in Connecticut comes as good news.
A federal judge dismissed the case of an employee who claimed being placed on paid leave was retaliation for complaining about the outcome of a workplace incident.
The case involved Brian Cooper, an employee of the Connecticut Department of Corrections who was out on workers’ comp while recovering from back surgery.
During his absence, a co-worker drew a cartoon depicting Cooper wearing a yarmulke, holding a fishing rod and placing a bag of ice on his back. The cartoon was passed around the workplace.
Cooper, who is Jewish, was shown the cartoon by a friend. He filed a complaint with his employer, alleging that the cartoon was anti-Semitic.
The employer investigated, determined the drawing violated the organization’s religious discrimination policy, and suspended the co-worker for five days without pay.
Not serious enough
When he returned to work, Cooper contacted HR to say he wasn’t satisfied with the severity of the co-worker’s punishment. He told the HR rep he “had no friends here” and that “they (co-workers) are going to try to take me down.”
Cooper added, according to the HR rep, that he’d had “extensive weapons training” and that he was feeling “very tightly wound right now and extremely paranoid.”
The HR rep, concerned about potential workplace violence, went to upper management. Cooper was placed on paid administrative leave pending tests to determine if he should come back to work. He continued to collect his regular salary.
After two months, he was allowed to return to work. His job title and pay level remained unchanged. After about three months, he again left the job because of his back problems and went on workers’ comp.
Retaliation claim
Cooper filed suit, charging that the employer had retaliated against him for questioning the handling of the cartoon incident. The “adverse action”?
Placing him on paid leave.
The federal district court found in favor of the company. The employer had applied pre-existing disciplinary policies in a reasonable way, and it properly responded to what it saw as a potential threat to workplace safety.
What’s more, Cooper hadn’t suffered any negative consequences from the paid leave, the judge ruled.
Cite: Cooper v. Connecticut Department of Corrections. For a look at the full court decision, go here.

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS immediately access 10 FREE HR guides.

I WANT MY FREE GUIDES

Keep Up To Date with the Latest HR News

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

Sign up for a free HRMorning membership and get our newsletter!
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • HR Technology
  • Performance Management
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation & Payroll
  • Policy & Culture
  • Staff Administration
  • Wellness & Safety
  • Staff Departure
  • Employee Services
  • Work Location
  • HR Career & Self-Care

HRMorning, part of the SuccessFuel Network, provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day’s headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Privacy Policy Terms of Service
Copyright © 2021 SuccessFuel

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

preloader