• FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
        • SEE MORE
          PREMIUM RESOURCES
  • HR DEEP DIVES
        • Coronavirus (COVID-19) Resources for HR Professionals
          Employment Law
          Labor Law Posting Requirements: Everything You Need to Know
          Recruiting
          businesswoman selecting future employees on digital interfaces
          Recruiting Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
          Performance Management
          vector image of young female making star rating
          Performance Review Resources
          Employment Law
          Understanding Equal Employment Opportunity and the EEOC
          Recruiting
          Onboarding Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
  • CORONAVIRUS & HR

  • LOGIN
  • SIGN UP FREE

HR Morning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
        • SEE MORE
          PREMIUM RESOURCES
  • HR DEEP DIVES
        • Coronavirus (COVID-19) Resources for HR Professionals
          Employment Law
          Labor Law Posting Requirements: Everything You Need to Know
          Recruiting
          businesswoman selecting future employees on digital interfaces
          Recruiting Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
          Performance Management
          vector image of young female making star rating
          Performance Review Resources
          Employment Law
          Understanding Equal Employment Opportunity and the EEOC
          Recruiting
          Onboarding Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
  • CORONAVIRUS & HR
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • More
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Staff Administration
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • Employee Services
    • Work Location
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans

NLRB stance on social networks getting a little clearer

Tim Gould
by Tim Gould
May 20, 2011
2 minute read
  • SHARE ON

The National Labor Relations Board just can’t seem to get enough of this new-fangled social networking business. But a couple of recent developments provide some clarification on where the agency’s headed on the issue.
First, NLRB officials decided that the firing of a Tucson newspaper reporter for improper comments on Twitter wasn’t a violation of federal labor regs.
Then the agency announced it had filed a complaint against a Buffalo, NY-based non-profit organization following the firing of five employees who criticized their working conditions on Facebook.
Offensive tweets
The Tucson case centered on a crime reporter for the Arizona Daily Star. Although the paper had no written social media policy, editors encouraged reporters and other staffers to use social media to promote its coverage.
The reporter got in hot water after using Twitter to run some sensational items on crime in Tucson (one example: “You stay homicidal, Tucson. See Star Net for bloody deets”) and make negative comments about co-workers and headlines in the paper’s sports section. He also tweeted about a misspelled headline that appeared on a local television station’s Twitter feed: “Stupid TV people.”
After the TV station complained, the reporter was fired. He complained to the NLRB, charging that his termination violated federal labor regs.
But NLRB counsel Barry Kearney advised officials that the reporter’s firing didn’t violate rules protecting employees’ rights to discuss workplace issues — he’d been sacked for inappropriate and offensive Twitter postings that were banned under company policy.
You can read the full advice memorandum here, courtesy of Employer Law Report.
Facebook exchange was protected, agency says
Here’s a look at the Buffalo case, from a press release from the NLRB:
The case involves an employee who, in advance of a meeting with management about working conditions, posted to her Facebook page a coworker’s allegation that employees did not do enough to help the organization’s clients.
The initial post generated responses from other employees who defended their job performance and criticized working conditions, including work load and staffing issues.
After learning of the posts, the agency discharged the five employees who participated, claiming that their comments constituted harassment of the employee originally mentioned in the post.
The complaint alleges that the Facebook discussion was “protected concerted activity”  — it involved a conversation among co-workers about their terms and conditions of employment, including their job performance and staffing levels.
The case is scheduled for a hearing before an administrative law judge June 22.
Drawing a line
What’s to be learned from these two cases? Seems like the NLRB is, indeed, narrowing the criteria for what sort of social media usage is “protected activity.”
In Tucson, the employee was fired for violating company policy and standards of conduct. The offending tweets didn’t concern general employment issues like working conditions or salary levels.
In Buffalo, the employees were discussing workloads, staffing levels and other employment issues. Therefore — in the eyes of the NLRB — that exchange was protected under labor law.

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS immediately access 10 FREE HR guides.

I WANT MY FREE GUIDES

Keep Up To Date with the Latest HR News

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

Sign up for a free HRMorning membership and get our newsletter!
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • HR Technology
  • Performance Management
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation & Payroll
  • Policy & Culture
  • Staff Administration
  • Wellness & Safety
  • Staff Departure
  • Employee Services
  • Work Location
  • HR Career & Self-Care

HRMorning, part of the SuccessFuel Network, provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day’s headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Privacy Policy Terms of Service
Copyright © 2021 SuccessFuel

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

preloader