What’s the best way to make sure our managers don’t expose us to legal liability for pregnancy discrimination?
Quick Answer
Before new managers assume their positions or immediately thereafter, employers should train them on the requirements of federal, state and local laws banning pregnancy discrimination. In addition, periodic training should be provided to existing managers on a regular basis.
Legal Perspective
ReedSmith
Chicago, Illinois
Federal, state and local laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of pregnancy, which typically also encompasses childbirth, breastfeeding and related medical conditions, according to employment attorneys Jill Vorobiev and Mallory McCarthy.
There are certain steps that employers can take to mitigate legal liability for pregnancy-based discrimination, harassment and retaliation.
First, employers can implement and enforce workplace policies that prohibit pregnancy-based discrimination. For example, employers may maintain equal employment opportunity and anti-discrimination policies that, among other things, prohibit pregnancy-based discrimination with regard to all employment decisions, including hiring, promotion, discipline and discharge. Employers should ensure their managers are familiar with these policies and how these policies should shape the ways in which managers interact with pregnant employees.
Second, employers can train their managers on effectively handling aspects of employment that may impact pregnant employees. Training may focus on navigating the reasonable accommodation process with employees who are pregnant or requesting accommodation for related medical conditions. With regard to this training, employers may consider conducting manager training that focuses on aspects of the newly enacted federal Pregnant Workers Fairness Act, which went into effect on June 27, 2023. This new law generally requires employers with at least 15 employees to provide reasonable accommodations to an employee’s known limitations related to pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions. This training may consist of information regarding where to direct these requests (i.e., HR) and how to implement approved accommodations for employees.
Other manager training may focus on effectively handling complaints of pregnancy-based discrimination or proper hiring practices when interviewing applicants or employees. For example, when interviewing individuals for hire or promotion, managers should refrain from asking questions directed at uncovering the individual’s pregnancy (or non-pregnancy) status.
Relevant Case Law
Hall v. Seneca Area Emergency Services, Inc.
EEOC v. Bob Evans Farms LLC
Latowski v. North Woods Nursing Center
HR Insight
CertiK
New York, New York
I would remind hiring managers that we only need to focus on the relevant attributes of the job, says HR Leader Erin ImHof.
It doesn’t matter if the applicant is pregnant; as long as they can do the role, that’s what matters. I’d also remind managers that they can hire a temp and that they should appropriately plan on distributing the employee’s work once during the upcoming job-protected leave.
JAMHI Health & Wellness Inc.
Juneau, Alaska
I have provided in-depth training to our supervisors about protected classes, including pregnancy, says HR Director Amber Kilmer. All hiring decisions are reviewed and approved through my department, and we use a scoring matrix. I also regularly audit interview panels.
Westside Family Healthcare
Wilmington, Delaware
The best way to ensure managers make good decisions is training, according to Aggie Flores, an HR Director in Delaware. Many managers are promoted without any training on managing people or any of the laws that now affect them in a different way.
For pregnancy, it’s important to remind managers to communicate with the employee and make sure that any issues are discussed, any accommodations needed are discussed, and no decisions are made without consulting HR to ensure fairness and objectivity.
The Cost of Noncompliance
Company pays $375K to settle EEOC’s pregnancy discrimination lawsuit
Who was involved: Oatridge Security Group, Inc., a security company based in Washington, and a pregnant employee who was fired.
What happened: The EEOC’s lawsuit alleged the company fired the employee after learning she was pregnant, explaining that “security work was not proper for a pregnant woman.” The woman made several attempts to get her job back before filing a complaint with the EEOC, alleging pregnancy discrimination and retaliation.
Result: The company paid $375,000 to the employee, which included lost wages and compensatory damages. It also agreed to:
- Implement policies, procedures, and training to ensure discrimination-free workplaces in the future.
- Enhance accountability and oversight of managers and employees.
- Provide anti-discrimination training to all employees.
- Track and report to the EEOC all complaints of discrimination or retaliation.
- Post a notice about the consent decree and employee rights under federal law.
Info: Oatridge Security Group To Pay $375,000 to Settle EEOC Sex Discrimination Lawsuit, 11/13/20.
Company paid $30K to fired pregnant employee
Who was involved: Awon Phie LLC, d/b/a Holiday Inn Express North Padre Island and a pregnant employee in Texas.
What happened: According to the EEOC’s lawsuit, the company’s operations manager told the woman that she had noticed her stomach, referring to her being pregnant. The manager then fired the employee, telling her that her pregnancy made her a “liability.”
Result: The company paid $30,000 to the worker and also agreed to the following post-resolution relief:
- Hiring an external equal employment opportunity consultant.
- Revising policies and procedures to ensure compliance with federal equal employment opportunity laws and regulations.
- Providing anti-discrimination training, including training on Title VII and the Pregnancy Discrimination Act.
- Posting a notice regarding the consent decree settling the suit.
Info: Awon Phie LLC to Pay $30,000 to Settle EEOC Pregnancy Discrimination, 10/27/21.
Company owner: Pregnant women can’t handle the stress, long hours of management position
Who was involved: Receivable Management, d/b/a Kramer and Associates, a debt collection firm in New Jersey, and a pregnant employee.
What happened: The EEOC’s lawsuit alleged the company rescinded its offer to promote the employee after she announced she was pregnant. Specifically, the complaint alleged that the worker would not be promoted because the company owner didn’t think a pregnant woman could handle the stress and the long hours of a management position.
Result: In June 2017, a federal judge entered a default judgment against the company. Under it, the company must pay $118,483 to the employee.
Info: EEOC Awarded $118,483 Judgment against Receivable Management for Pregnancy Discrimination, 6/2/17.
Key Takeaways
- Federal laws including the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act, and the PUMP for Nursing Mothers Act provide protections to employees based on or directly related to pregnancy.
- New and current managers must be trained regularly regarding the requirements of applicable federal, state and local laws addressing pregnancy discrimination and protections related to pregnancy-related conditions and pregnancy itself.
- Train managers how to engage in an interactive process with pregnant employees when a pregnancy-related accommodation may be appropriate.
- Actively encourage managers to support pregnant employees by permitting flexible work schedules and accommodating their need to attend related medical appointments.
- Other examples of possible accommodations include relaxing dress code restrictions and offering special parking privileges.
- Individual state and local laws may provide additional separate protections from discrimination based on pregnancy.