What do we do if we think an employee’s pregnancy endangers her safety at work?
Quick Answer
An employer’s concern about risks to a pregnant employee rarely justifies job restrictions. An employer that subjects a pregnant worker to involuntary reassignment based on concerns about her health or safety violates the Pregnancy Discrimination Act unless it shows that non-pregnancy is a bona fide occupational qualification.
Legal Perspective
Foley & Lardner LLP
Chicago, Illinois
If an employer believes that an employee’s medical condition such as pregnancy poses a risk of injury to the employee or others at work, it may require the employee to produce a fitness for duty certification from the employee’s physician, says employment law attorney Bennett Epstein (BEpstein@foley.com) of the firm Foley & Lardner LLP.
The fitness for duty certification requires the physician to describe the medical condition, state whether the employee may perform her job without posing a direct threat to herself and others, the duration of the risk and whether there are any accommodations that would permit the employee to perform her job without posing a direct threat.
The EEOC has addressed this question in a publication The ADA: Questions and Answers: Does the ADA take safety issues into account?
A. Yes. The ADA expressly permits employers to establish qualification standards that will exclude individuals who pose a direct threat — i.e., a significant risk of substantial harm — to the health or safety of the individual or of others, if that risk cannot be lowered to an acceptable level by reasonable accommodation. However, an employer may not simply assume that a threat exists; the employer must establish through objective, medically supportable methods that there is genuine risk that substantial harm could occur in the workplace. By requiring employers to make individualized judgments based on reliable medical or other objective evidence rather than on generalizations, ignorance, fear, patronizing attitudes, or stereotypes, the ADA recognizes the need to balance the interests of people with disabilities against the legitimate interests of employers in maintaining a safe workplace.
Relevant Case Law
Int’l Union, UAW v. Johnson Controls, Inc.
Santana v. Zilog, Inc.
HR Insight
PCC Medical Holdings
West Palm Beach, Florida
Pregnancy should be handled as any other illness; however, it encompasses different criteria, HR Director Sue Schwartz explains.
The primary test would be the ability to perform the essential duties of the position. If the employee is unable to perform them due to pregnancy constraints, then she could be temporarily transferred to a more accommodating position or she could go on FMLA.
Runtal North America Inc.
Ward Hill, Massachusetts
Have a discussion with the employee and inform her of all safety concerns related to the job, says HR Manager Beth Calitri. She is a protected class, and we can’t discriminate on the basis of her pregnancy. She needs as much information as possible to discuss with her OBGYN, and between them, they will make an informed decision.
Everde Growers
Houston, Texas
I would start with a conversation with the pregnant employee, says Carmela Bozulich, a Recruiter in California. Ask her how she feels about what she’s doing, if she feels safe or if she’s following any safety rules in place, etc.
Depending on what she tells you, you may want to get a doctor’s certificate or other medical verification of any limitations or modifications. Based on that and the actual job duties she is required to perform, you’ll need to make a decision as to whether she can continue in that particular role or not, or if you can accommodate her elsewhere in the organization.
The Cost of Noncompliance
EEOC: Company agrees to pay $27K to woman fired after she became pregnant
Who was involved: Azul Wellness, LLC, d/b/a Orlando Float, a massage therapy company, and a pregnant employee in Florida.
What happened: The employee worked as a massage therapist. The EEOC's suit alleged that she was fired after the company learned she was pregnant. A company policy required all pregnant employees to provide a doctor’s note – regardless of whether they were seeking an accommodation. The company’s position, the EEOC alleged, was that providing massages could present a safety risk to pregnant women and their unborn children. When the employee expressed concern about providing a doctor’s note, she was fired.
Result: The company agreed to pay $27,000 to the woman. Under a five-year consent decree, the company must also:
- Discontinue the policy of requiring all pregnant employees to provide a doctor’s note.
- Provide four hours of live training annually to managers and HR personnel.
- Implement new policies that prohibit pregnancy discrimination.
- Update its job advertisement and application material.
- Submit bi-annual reports to the EEOC, detailing employee complaints about pregnancy discrimination.
Info: Orlando Float to Pay $27,000 to Settle Pregnancy Discrimination Suit, 2/3/20.
‘No pregnancy in the workplace’ policy: Religious nonprofit pays nearly $75K to fired worker
Who was involved: United Bible Fellowship Ministries, Inc., a nonprofit that provides housing and residential care to clients with disabilities, and a pregnant employee in Texas.
What happened: The employer had a "no pregnancy in the workplace" policy which prohibited the continued employment of any employee who became pregnant. Under that policy, it fired a resource technician who provided care to residents after it learned she was pregnant. When the EEOC sued on the woman’s behalf, the employer argued the termination was legally justifiable to protect the safety of the woman and her unborn child.
Result: A federal judge ordered the employer to pay $24,764 in back pay and another $50,000 in punitive damages based on the employer’s “malice or reckless indifference” to the woman’s federally protected rights.
Info: Judge Awards Nearly $75,000 to Victim of Pregnancy Discrimination in EEOC Suit Against United Bible, 5/27/15.
Key Takeaways
- The federal Pregnancy Discrimination Act bans discrimination based on current pregnancy, past pregnancy, potential or intended pregnancy, and medical conditions related to childbirth or pregnancy.
- Do not make employment decisions, such as a decision to reassign a pregnant employee, based on stereotypes or assumptions relating to pregnancy.
- If the employee’s pregnancy presents a legitimate job safety threat, engage in an interactive process with the employee to find a job accommodation that will eliminate the threat.
- Inform the employee of any special risks the job creates for pregnant employees.
- If non-pregnancy is a bona fide occupational qualification, then removal from the job is permitted.