Human Resources News & Insights

Do your managers know the FMLA ‘contact’ rule?

Usually, not returning a phone call is simply considered rude. Now a court ruling says it might also qualify as evidence of FMLA retaliation.

That’s the takeaway from a recent case in Pennsylvania, where an employee on FMLA leave found that communicating with her employer was pretty much a one-way street.

Kathleen Hofferica, a registered nurse, was granted intermittent FMLA leave for an inner ear disorder known as Meniere’s disease.

Hofferica then took extended leave to get treatment for the disorder. She said she regularly provided her supervisor with updates on her condition, but her manager often failed to return her calls.

Just before she was scheduled to return, Hofferica submitted a certification saying she could return to work but needed a one-week extension.

The manager never called her back. Instead, she received a letter saying she’d been fired for exceeding the agreed-to amount of FMLA leave.

Hofferica filed suit, claiming the hospital retaliated against her for taking leave.

The court agreed.

The manager’s “failure to return phone calls … certainly suggests an antagonistic attitude toward the employee, particularly where –as here — such refusal began after the employee initiated FMLA leave, and continued despite regular communications from the employee,” the judge wrote.

So the court tossed the company’s motion to dismiss the case.  You know what that likely means: an expensive settlement or a long expensive trial.

Staying in contact

Nowadays, it’s generally considered best practice to maintain contact with employees out on leave — no matter what statute the leave might fall under.

It simply makes sense: Companies monitor employee progress in order to make sensible staffing plans, and the employee can be kept in the loop about what’s going on in the workplace.

Frankly, we’re hoping the manager gets called on the carpet for his/her conduct in this case. Whether the behavior happened through negligence or hostility toward the employee, continually ignoring phone messages certainly didn’t serve the company’s best interest.

The case is Hofferica v. St. Mary Medical Center. To read the full court decision, go here.

Subscribe Today

Get the latest and greatest Human Resources news and insights delivered to your inbox.
  • Robin

    I have to say I agree in this particular case. However I will say that I have tried to contact employees repeatedly with no response from them until they receive the letter saying that their leave is expired and benefits will be terminated and they will be offered COBRA. They send no updated medical information or stay in contact during FML. I’m not saying everyone, but there are some who don’t.

    After a termination we ended up in front of the human rights commission. Though I had documented the calls I made and had phone records to prove it, the employee said I had never contacted him at all. Didn’t matter what I had done, the Human Rights Commission said it was the employers responsibility to reach out and contact the employee. Just proved to me that it doesn’t really matter how hard you try, they side with the employee every time and the employee has ZERO responsibility for their inactions. Definitely soured me and sent the wrong message to the employee.

  • Joanna G.

    I fully agree with the verdict in this matter. There are many cases as this one, with the only difference that employees often don’t file in court, they “go” quietly and look for another job allowing a retaliation or antagonism. Far too often employers take adventage of sick employees.
    It is my practice to frequently send e-mails to employees on any kind of leave: prolonged sickenss, FMLA, or disability. Communicating to employees the company best wishes for recovery, asking if I can be of help in any work/leave related matters and assuring that they can contact me in any way convenient to them is immensely helpful in maintaing proper and friendly relation. Even if I am not particulary fond of the employee, all things must be done in a professional and employee-friendly manner. So far this approach is working. Yes, it takes my time, but employees gratitude is worth the effort.

  • Joanna G.

    Robin, you most certainly had a very bad experience. And you are right, it sent a bad message and the verdict of the Human Rights Commission was not just in your case. I guess, then it is all about written correspondence sent via certified mail with return receipt request, or even registered mail. We have to cover “our behind” as we never know who we are dealing with.