• FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
        • SEE MORE
          PREMIUM RESOURCES
  • HR DEEP DIVES
        • Coronavirus (COVID-19) Resources for HR Professionals
          Employment Law
          Labor Law Posting Requirements: Everything You Need to Know
          Recruiting
          businesswoman selecting future employees on digital interfaces
          Recruiting Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
          Performance Management
          vector image of young female making star rating
          Performance Review Resources
          Employment Law
          Understanding Equal Employment Opportunity and the EEOC
          Recruiting
          Onboarding Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
  • CORONAVIRUS & HR

  • LOGIN
  • SIGN UP FREE

HR Morning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
        • SEE MORE
          PREMIUM RESOURCES
  • HR DEEP DIVES
        • Coronavirus (COVID-19) Resources for HR Professionals
          Employment Law
          Labor Law Posting Requirements: Everything You Need to Know
          Recruiting
          businesswoman selecting future employees on digital interfaces
          Recruiting Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
          Performance Management
          vector image of young female making star rating
          Performance Review Resources
          Employment Law
          Understanding Equal Employment Opportunity and the EEOC
          Recruiting
          Onboarding Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
  • CORONAVIRUS & HR
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • More
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Staff Administration
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • Employee Services
    • Work Location
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans

Employees have ADA responsibilities, too, court says

Christian Schappel
by Christian Schappel
January 16, 2015
3 minute read
  • SHARE ON

Courts are always busting employers’ chops when it comes to ADA responsibilities. That’s what makes this so refreshing: A court just took an employee to task for not holding up her end of the ADA bargain. 
The employee’s name is Pamela Manning. She was a full-time sales associate for Kohl’s Department Stores who worked 36 to 40 hours per week via predictable, daytime shifts. She also suffered from Type I diabetes.
Eventually, Kohl’s needed to restructure its staffing system. Manning was able to keep her full-time status, but to do so she needed to perform work in other departments. This resulted in her working a much more varied schedule. She often had to work a “swing shift,” which involved following up a night shift with an early day shift.
Manning claimed the erratic shifts aggravated her diabetes, and her doctor agreed. She then requested to work more predictable hours, and submitted a doctor’s note to Kohl’s that supported her request.

‘We can’t do that, but … ‘

Kohl’s managers then informed Manning that it couldn’t fulfill her request to work more consistent shifts. However, at that time the management team also informed her that it would be willing to consider and discuss other accommodations.
At that point, Manning became upset and said she had “no choice but to quit,” claiming that if she continued to work unpredictable hours she would go into ketoacidosis or a coma. She then put her store keys on the table and left the room.
A manager followed her and attempted to calm her down. The manager asked Manning to reconsider resigning and discuss other potential accommodations.
Manning responded by saying, “Well, you just told me corporate wouldn’t do anything for me.” She then cleaned out her locker and left the building.
A few days later, she contacted the EEOC, which sued Kohl’s on her behalf, claiming the company failed to accommodate Manning’s disability.

Failed to engage in interactive process

A district court threw the EEOC’s lawsuit out, and that decision was later upheld by an appellate court.
Both said Manning had failed to engage in the ADA’s required interactive process.
According to the appellate court:

The interactive process involves an informal dialogue between the employee and the employer in which the two parties discuss the issues affecting the employee and potential reasonable accommodations that might address those issues. … It requires bilateral cooperation and communication.”

Kohl’s tried to initiate that dialogue, but Manning didn’t, the court said. So she couldn’t claim Kohl’s failed to accommodate her disability.

Good news for employers

Not only is it good to see a court hold an employee’s feet to the fire when it comes to individuals’ ADA responsibilities, the case also serves as an important reminder that employees don’t have the power to dictate what accommodations they receive.
In addition, physicians can’t dictate the terms of accommodations either, although their input should always be welcome.
The interactive process the ADA requires must involve an interaction between all the parties involved — and not a one-way conversation in which one party tells the other what’s going to go down.
Cite: EEOC v. Kohl’s Department Stores Inc.

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS immediately access 10 FREE HR guides.

I WANT MY FREE GUIDES

Keep Up To Date with the Latest HR News

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

Sign up for a free HRMorning membership and get our newsletter!
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • HR Technology
  • Performance Management
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation & Payroll
  • Policy & Culture
  • Staff Administration
  • Wellness & Safety
  • Staff Departure
  • Employee Services
  • Work Location
  • HR Career & Self-Care

HRMorning, part of the SuccessFuel Network, provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day’s headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Privacy Policy Terms of Service
Copyright © 2021 SuccessFuel

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

preloader