• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

HRMorning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
  • HR DEEP DIVES
  • PODCASTS
    • VOICES OF HR
    • WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP TODAY
  • LOGIN
  • SIGN UP FREE
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • HR Technology
  • Payroll
  • Management
  • Women’s Leadership
  • More
    • Talent Management
    • Performance Management
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans
  • Employment Law

Equal pay settlement: What a $54M gender bias mistake looks like

Carol Warner
By: Carol Warner
  • Share on

About the Author

For nearly two decades, Carol Warner has analyzed the legal and financial realities behind workplace decisions, covering employment law, benefits, payroll and HR technology. She translates complex legal updates, regulatory shifts and vendor claims into plain language that HR teams can act on. Her focus is simple: What does this mean for employers, and what should they do next? Connect with her on LinkedIn.

Show Less
Last Updated: December 19, 2023
2 minute engagement

Earlier this year, we told you that income-related equality was going to be one of the top employment law issues of 2023.

Now, as the year winds to a close, a new eight-figure equal pay settlement shows just how expensive paycheck-related gender bias can be.

State agency sues video game company

According to a lawsuit filed by the California Civil Rights Department (CRD), Activision Blizzard failed to provide equal pay to women in California who did substantially similar work to their male co-workers over five years, between Oct. 12, 2015, and Dec. 31, 2020.  

The suit also claimed women were denied promotional opportunities and faced additional sex-based discrimination during that timeframe.

In the CRD’s view, the alleged conduct was illegal. The agency sued Activision Blizzard, asserting violations of the state’s Equal Pay Act and its Fair Employment and Housing Act.

Hefty equal pay settlement

The CRD and Activision Blizzard reached an agreement to end the lawsuit, according to a Dec. 15 press release. Under the agreement, which is subject to court approval, Activision Blizzard will:   

  • Pay approximately $54,875,000 to cover relief to workers and litigation costs. Of that, about $45,750,000 will be deposited into a settlement fund earmarked for compensating affected workers.
  • Distribute any excess funds to charities focused on advancing women in the video game and technology industry and/or promoting awareness about gender equality in the workplace.
  • Hire an independent consultant to review and evaluate the company’s compensation and promotion policies and to make recommendations on the company’s training materials.
  • Continue its DEI efforts to include qualified candidates from underrepresented communities.

New settlement, old problem

The CRD clarified that this current settlement agreement is separate from the 2021 consent decree that Activision Blizzard entered into with the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission, which addressed sexual harassment allegations from Sept. 1, 2016, to March 29, 2022, and covered employees in Arkansas, California, Minnesota, New York, Texas and Wisconsin.  

Info: Civil Rights Department Announces Settlement Agreement to Resolve Employment Discrimination and Equal Pay Lawsuit Against Activision Blizzard, 12/15/23.      

Filed under
  • Employment Law
  • Share on

Get the HRMorning Newsletter

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form

Free Training & Resources

Webinars

Beyond Compliance: Building Trust Through AI Governance in HR

Provided by Paycom

EBOOK, White Papers

The Prevention Mandate: An Employer’s Framework for a Healthier Workforce

Provided by Personify Health

White Papers

HSA Employee Survey Kit

White Papers

Investing in HR Software

SPONSORED CONTENT

HR Technology

sponsored content
The Best AI Software for HR Automation

Courtesy of G-P

Talent Management

sponsored content
Powerful Employee Retention Strategies for 2025: How to Keep Your Best People

Courtesy of PEOPLEGURU

Benefits

Health Care

Wellness

sponsored content
Proven Results: 5 Ways Teladoc Health Chronic Condition Management Transforms HR Outcomes

Courtesy of TELADOC HEALTH

Further Reading

  • Employment Law
FLSA Lawsuits Ticked Up in 2025, New Report Shows

Wage and hour litigation isn’t letting up, and the latest data puts a clear dollar figure on just how much FLSA lawsuits can cost employe...

  • Employment Law
Quarterly Bonus and Overtime Pay: DOL Opinion Letter FLSA2026-6

Does a quarterly bonus trigger an overtime recalculation? A recent DOL opinion letter says it depends on how the bonus is structured – an...

  • Employment Law
  • Policy & Procedures
Termination Mistake — Court Explains Where Employer Went Wrong

A termination is justified if an employee is caught stealing, right? Not necessarily. This case shows that everything isn’t black and whi...

  • Employment Law
Was Safety Training Adequate? Worker Gets Hurt While Using Ladder

A federal court in Texas addressed safety training claims raised by a Home Depot worker who was injured while using a ladder to retrieve a ...

  • Employment Law
Fired over a mental health stereotype? What a $100K ADA mistake looks like

As you may have heard, focusing on employees’ mental health and well-being is expected to be one of the biggest workforce trends in 2024....

  • Employment Law
New Tool Shares Info on Workplace Injuries: 8 Data Points

If you haven’t heard, the feds just released a new online tool that allows users to search its database and view trends on workplace inju...

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS immediately access 10 FREE HR guides.

I WANT MY FREE GUIDES
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation
  • Policy & Procedures
  • Wellness
  • Staff Departure
  • HR Career & Self-Care
  • Health Care
  • Retirement Plans
  • DEI

HRMorning, part of the Rover Insights Network, provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day's headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Powered By Rover Insights
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
Copyright© 2026 Rover Insights
HRMorning Logo

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.