Skip to main content

Court ruled employer could stop employee from bringing emotional support dog to work

RM

By

Last updated November 6, 20241 min read
Court ruled employer could stop employee from bringing emotional support dog to work

Does it violate the ADA if an employer denies an employee’s request to bring a support animal to the office?

A recent court case addressed that very question.

Anxiety attacks

Nicholas Conlan worked as a marketer for Costco in Montana. He traveled often for his job, and requested to bring his dog with him. Conlan had anxiety attacks and migraines, and he claimed he’d trained his dog to recognize the signs of an attack and to alert others to get help.

Costco asked Conlan to get a note from his doctor, but when he did, the doctor referred to the animal as a “companion dog,” not a service dog.

Conlan began bringing his dog to work before receiving permission to do so. His employer questioned the severity of his anxiety, since Conlan had no work restrictions, and ultimately denied his request. Conlan sued for an ADA violation.

But a court agreed with the company. It said Conlan’s anxiety wasn’t covered by the ADA because he had no work restrictions and his own doctor didn’t classify the dog as a service animal.

In this case, the employer wasn’t required to allow emotional support animals at work, the court said.

Cite: Conlan v. Costco Wholesale Corp, 6/9/21.

Filed underEmployment Law
Share

Further Reading

  • Unpaid Pre-Shift Work Costs New Jersey Employer $725K

    A New Jersey drywall installer must pay $725,000 after failing to pay 48 workers overtime for pre-shift work performed while they waited for transportation to job sites. The U.S. Department of Labor’s (DOL) Wage and Hour Division found P & B Partitions Inc. violated the Fair Labor Standards Act’s overtime rules. The company also refused […]

  • Connecticut Joins States Regulating Workplace AI: 7 Compliance Steps

    Connecticut is putting employers on notice over workplace AI. Effective Oct. 1, 2026, SB 5 clarifies that Connecticut employers facing a discrimination claim can’t blame the artificial intelligence (AI) tools they use to make hiring, promotion, discipline or termination decisions. Other changes that kicked in the same day: And there’s more coming. The law’s second […]

  • Pa. Court Sets 3-Year Deadline for Minimum Wage Act Claims

    Pennsylvania employers face a three-year window for employees to sue over unpaid minimum wages or overtime under state law, rather than the six years a trial court previously allowed. The ruling came in a case involving 20 pharmacy employees seeking overtime for work done from 2017 to 2019. The employers argued the claims were filed […]

  • Hidden Payroll Rounding Risk: Unpaid Pre-Shift Time Under Scrutiny

    Required pre-shift tasks – and whether employees are paid for them – are at the center of a former hospital nurse’s wage dispute. Chestnut Hill Hospital required nurses to change into surgical scrubs by 7 a.m. for a morning huddle. Pamela McBride sued under the Fair Labor Standards Act, alleging the hospital didn’t pay her […]