• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

HRMorning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
  • HR DEEP DIVES
  • PODCASTS
    • VOICES OF HR
    • WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP TODAY
  • LOGIN
  • SIGN UP FREE
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • HR Technology
  • Payroll
  • Management
  • Women’s Leadership
  • More
    • Talent Management
    • Performance Management
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans
  • Employment Law

$395K ‘Onionhead’ religious discrimination award stands

Tim McElgunn
By: Tim McElgunn
  • Share on

About the Author

Tim, a member of the HRMorning staff, is a veteran writer and editor. His background includes producing and managing publications for Bloomberg, Frost & Sullivan, Gartner Group and McGraw-Hill.

Show Less
Last Updated: March 10, 2020
1 minute engagement
395K Onionhead Religious Discrimination award stands

A Syosset, NY company sued by the EEOC for religious discrimination after employees said they were fired for refusing to participate in religious practices lost its bid to get a $394,991 award struck down and to get a new trial in the case.

The EEOC sued United Health Programs of America Inc. (UHP) and its parent company Cost Containment Group, Inc (CCG) in June 2014 for allegedly forcing its employees to partake in the practices of a belief system known as “Harnessing Happiness,” or “Onionhead.”

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 forbids employers from practicing religious discrimination, including coercing employees to engage in religious practices at work. It also bars employers from firing or taking other adverse action against those who oppose such practices.

U.S. District Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on March 6 denied UHP and CCG’s request for a new trial.

EEOC supervisory trial attorney Nora Curtin said in a statement, “The EEOC is pleased that the court upheld the jury’s verdict.”

The original jury award of $5.1 million to the nine employees for religious discrimination was reduced “due to the statutory cap on damages applicable to defendant,” according to the EEOC’s 2018 annual report.

Filed under
  • Employment Law
  • Share on

Get the HRMorning Newsletter

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form
  • This field is hidden when viewing the form

Free Training & Resources

Webinars

Your Policy Changed. Did Employee Behavior?

Provided by Navex

White Papers

Participation Is Not Engagement

Provided by Terryberry

White Papers

How Employee Spending is Changing the Benefits Landscape

White Papers

The FMLA Paperwork Trap: Why Manual Leave Management Is Costing You More Than Time

Provided by AbsenceSoft

SPONSORED CONTENT

Employment Law

Policy & Procedures

sponsored content
Policy Rollout: 4 Checkpoints That Show Employees Got the Message

Courtesy of NAVEX

Benefits

Staff Administration

sponsored content
PEO ROI: 3 Numbers to Know Before You Leave Patchwork HR

Courtesy of TRINET

Talent Management

sponsored content
Employee Retention Strategies: 5 That Work When You Can’t Pay More

Courtesy of INSPIRUS

Further Reading

  • Employment Law
Are you a ‘covered employer’ under the FMLA? How to tell for sure

FMLA obligations don’t kick in unless an employer qualifies as a “covered employer” under the statute. Sometimes, determining whet...

  • Employment Law
Fired by text – what a $400K termination mistake looks like

As an HR pro, you’ve probably accepted that letting employees go is tough – but it’s part of the job. And you’ve likely figured out...

  • Employment Law
Manager Asked What!? Interview Mistake Prompts $30K Payout

As an HR pro, you know what NOT to ask during job interviews. But how confident are you in your hiring managers? Have they been given gu...

  • Employment Law
Unemployment benefits: Should this problem employee get them?

One of the reasons an application for unemployment benefits can be denied is that the employee engaged in job-related misconduct. But wh...

  • Employment Law
Supreme Court Sides With Starbucks, Deals Big Blow to NLRB

The Supreme Court just dealt a blow to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) by making it harder for the federal labor agency to win ea...

  • Employment Law
Accommodation Denied: Employee Told to Retire or Face Termination

Dangerous work and employees with disabilities aren’t always a bad mix. In fact, these employees often can do a stellar job, sometimes wi...

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS immediately access 10 FREE HR guides.

I WANT MY FREE GUIDES
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation
  • Policy & Procedures
  • Wellness
  • Staff Departure
  • HR Career & Self-Care
  • Health Care
  • Retirement Plans
  • DEI

HRMorning, part of the Rover Insights Network, provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day's headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Powered By Rover Insights
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
Copyright© 2026 Rover Insights
HRMorning Logo

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.