• FREE RESOURCES
        • Creating a Legally Sound Remote Work Policy: The 5 Biggest Pitfalls to Avoid
          Creating a Legally Sound Remote Work Policy: The 5 Biggest Pitfalls to Avoid
          Employment Law
          FMLA Cheat Sheet: A Handy At-A-Glance Guide
          HR Career & Self-Care
          Lead Magnet: 110 Traits of Highly Effective HR Pros
          11 Traits of Highly Effective HR Pros
          Recruiting
          New Employee Checklist
          Recruiting
          How to Write a Job Description Worksheet
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
        • SEE MORE
          PREMIUM RESOURCES
  • HR DEEP DIVES
  • CORONAVIRUS & HR

  • LOGIN
  • SIGN UP FREE

HR Morning

  • FREE RESOURCES
        • Creating a Legally Sound Remote Work Policy: The 5 Biggest Pitfalls to Avoid
          Creating a Legally Sound Remote Work Policy: The 5 Biggest Pitfalls to Avoid
          Employment Law
          FMLA Cheat Sheet: A Handy At-A-Glance Guide
          HR Career & Self-Care
          Lead Magnet: 110 Traits of Highly Effective HR Pros
          11 Traits of Highly Effective HR Pros
          Recruiting
          New Employee Checklist
          Recruiting
          How to Write a Job Description Worksheet
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
        • SEE MORE
          PREMIUM RESOURCES
  • HR DEEP DIVES
  • CORONAVIRUS & HR
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • More
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Staff Administration
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • Employee Services
    • Work Location
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans

Turns out HR pros & managers can be liable (personally) for FMLA violations

FMLA leave
Christian Schappel
by Christian Schappel
March 22, 2017
4 minute read
  • SHARE ON

Courts have ruled that managers and supervisors can be held personally liable for FLSA violations. And now, in a new twist, courts are saying they can be individually liable for FMLA violations as well. Here’s why and when. 

In a nutshell, the FMLA says that an employer can be:

“… any person who acts, directly or indirectly, in the interest of an employer to any of the employees of such employer …

And employers can be held liable for FMLA violations — even if those “employers” are individuals within a company.

So how do you determine who qualifies as an employer under the law? Courts have recently ruled that the FMLA’s definition of employer closely tracks the definition of employer under the FLSA and, therefore, have reasoned that the standards used to evaluate employers under the FLSA should be applied to FMLA cases as well.

In other words, courts can look at the “economic reality” of a situation to determine an individual’s level of control over an employee — and, thus, that individual’s liability under the FMLA.

Employee claims HR director is liable

Recently, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit used this very line of thinking to determine that Shaynan Garrioch, the director of HR for the Culinary Institute of America (CIA), could potentially be held individually liable for FMLA violations allegedly committed against Cathleen Graziadio, CIA’s payroll administrator.

What happened was, Graziadio requested FMLA leave to care for her 17-year-old son after he was hospitalized with complications related to his diabetes.

Fill Open Positions Fasters

A few weeks later, Graziadio returned to work and handed in a medical certification supporting her need for leave. She was then promptly pulled out of work again because her 12-year-old son fractured his leg playing basketball and needed surgery. So she again requested FMLA leave.

Then, shortly before she was supposed to return to work for the second time, Graziadio asked her supervisor if CIA required any further documentation from her regarding her leaves. Her inquiry was then forwarded to Garrioch. But she received no answer.

After several attempts by Graziadio to obtain an answer, CIA sent her a letter stating her FMLA paperwork didn’t justify her absences.

She then tried again to find out what paperwork CIA needed, but she received no response. When told she couldn’t return to work without medical documentation to justify her leave, Graziadio hired an attorney who followed up with CIA on her behalf.

Her attorney then said that: “CIA continued to take the position that Ms. Graziadio would not be returned to work because she had not provided sufficient support to justify her absences,” and insisted that “it was not the employer’s obligation to explain what was missing from the paperwork and instead that it was Ms. Graziadio’s obligation to comply with the statute.”

After failing to make any headway on the documentation issue, Graziadio was eventually terminated for abandoning her position. She then filed an FMLA interference and retaliation lawsuit against CIA as well as Garrioch.

Was HR director her employer?

As part of an attempt to get Graziadio’s lawsuit thrown out, the defense’s legal counsel argued that Garrioch wasn’t an employer under the FMLA and, therefore, couldn’t be held individually liable.

But the appeals court disagreed and ruled that not only should Graziadio’s FMLA interference and retaliation claims go to trial, but also it’s possible that Garrioch may be able to be held personally liable. So now a jury will sort things out, which may prove costly for CIA and Garrioch.

In determining whether Garrioch could be held individually liable under the FMLA, the court looked at four factors used under the FLSA to determine “employer” status:

  1. Whether Garrioch had the power to fire and hire Graziadio. The answer: Yes.
  2. Whether Garrioch controlled Graziadio’s work schedules or conditions of employment. The answer: Yes, based upon the fact that she controlled when Graziadio could return to work and played a hand in the decision to terminate her.
  3. Whether Garrioch determined the rate and method of payment for Graziadio. The answer: No.
  4. Whether the Garrioch maintained employment records. The answer: No.

But based on the fact that the answer clearly appeared to be yes to two of those factors, the court ruled there was enough evidence to support that Garrioch controlled Graziadio’s FMLA rights in an employer capacity.

It’s still possible that a jury will find that Garrioch wasn’t personally liable — or even that Graziadio’s FMLA claims in general don’t hold water. But this is an important reminder that HR managers — as well as ordinary managers and supervisors — can be held individually liable for certain FMLA screw-ups.

Cite: Graziadio v. Culinary Institute of America

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS immediately access 10 FREE HR guides.

I WANT MY FREE GUIDES

Keep Up To Date with the Latest HR News

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

Sign up for a free HRMorning membership and get our newsletter!
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation
  • Staff Administration
  • Policy & Procedures
  • Wellness
  • Staff Departure
  • Employee Services
  • Work Location
  • HR Career & Self-Care
  • Health Care
  • Retirement Plans

HRMorning, part of the SuccessFuel Network, provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day’s headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Privacy Policy Terms of Service
Copyright © 2022 SuccessFuel

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

preloader