• FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
        • SEE MORE
          PREMIUM RESOURCES
  • HR DEEP DIVES
        • Coronavirus (COVID-19) Resources for HR Professionals
          Employment Law
          Labor Law Posting Requirements: Everything You Need to Know
          Recruiting
          businesswoman selecting future employees on digital interfaces
          Recruiting Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
          Performance Management
          vector image of young female making star rating
          Performance Review Resources
          Employment Law
          Understanding Equal Employment Opportunity and the EEOC
          Recruiting
          Onboarding Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
  • CORONAVIRUS & HR

  • LOGIN
  • SIGN UP FREE

HR Morning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
        • SEE MORE
          PREMIUM RESOURCES
  • HR DEEP DIVES
        • Coronavirus (COVID-19) Resources for HR Professionals
          Employment Law
          Labor Law Posting Requirements: Everything You Need to Know
          Recruiting
          businesswoman selecting future employees on digital interfaces
          Recruiting Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
          Performance Management
          vector image of young female making star rating
          Performance Review Resources
          Employment Law
          Understanding Equal Employment Opportunity and the EEOC
          Recruiting
          Onboarding Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
  • CORONAVIRUS & HR
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • More
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Staff Administration
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • Employee Services
    • Work Location
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans

'Mark of the Beast' keeps popping up in lawsuits: Are accommodations required?

religious discrimination
Christian Schappel
by Christian Schappel
February 11, 2015
3 minute read
  • SHARE ON

Do you have to accommodate individuals whose religious beliefs lead them to think their jobs will brand them with the “Mark of the Beast?” Is this something you even have to worry about? 
Let’s tackle the second question first: Apparently, discrimination lawsuits involving the “Mark of the Beast” — and accommodation requests to avoid it — aren’t all that uncommon.
Just recently, we brought you the case of Beverly Butcher, Jr., who worked at Consol Energy’s Robinson Run Mine.
Butcher feared the hand scanner Consol used to track workers’ hours would imprint him with the “Mark of the Beast.” As a result, he said using the scanner went against his religious beliefs and asked HR officials to seek alternative options for him.
Apparently, the manufacturer of the scanner had heard these accusations before and was ready with a letter it passed along to Consol, which then gave to Butcher. It said the scanners “do not in any way have the ability to detect … or place the ‘mark of the Beast’ or any other mark on a person’s hand.”
In the end, Consol denied his request for accommodations.
Butcher then took his case to the EEOC, which filed a religious discrimination suit on his behalf. A jury then awarded Butcher $150,000.
Bottom line: These cases do need to be taken seriously.

Accommodations can’t ask you to violate federal law

Now, on to the first question: Do you have to accommodate individuals whose religious beliefs lead them to think their jobs will brand them with the “Mark of the Beast?”
The result of Butcher’s lawsuit may have you leaning toward “yes.” But really, these cases should be treated no differently from other religious or disability accommodation requests.
Rather than focusing on whether the person’s religious belief or disability is serious enough to warrant an accommodation, focus instead on whether or not providing an accommodation would create an undue business-related hardship.
Recently, in a case that went against an individual with a “Mark of the Beast” claim, a court determined that an accommodation request that would conflict with federal law would create an undue business hardship — and, therefore, could be denied.
The case involved job candidate Donald Yeager and another energy firm, FirstEnergy Generation Corp.
Yeager had applied for a job at FirstEnergy, which then asked Yeager for his Social Security number.
At that point, Yeager informed FirstEnergy that he had no Social Security number because, as court documents point out, “he had disclaimed and disavowed it on account of his sincerely held religious beliefs.”
Yeager believed that being identified by any number was tantamount to having the “Mark of the Beast.”
Yeager then sued, claiming religious discrimination.
His case, however, was thrown out by a court before it could go to trial.
In dismissing his case the court said the Internal Revenue Code requires employers such as FirstEnergy to collect and provide the Social Security numbers of their employees, and that violating a federal statute would impose an undue hardship on FirstEnergy.

Focus on the hardship question

The difference between Butcher’s case and Yeager’s: Providing Butcher with another method of logging his work hours likely wouldn’t have created an undue hardship for Consol.
Meanwhile, there appeared to be no way of accommodating Yeager without violating a federal statute.
In neither case were the individual’s religious beliefs called into question by the courts, and employers can expect that to be the case in other courtrooms.
In all but perhaps the rarest of cases, courts will focus the majority of their attention on assessing whether or not what individuals are asking for would create undue business-related hardships.
Cite: EEOC v. Consol Energy Inc. & Yeager v. FirstEnergy Generation Corp.

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS immediately access 10 FREE HR guides.

I WANT MY FREE GUIDES

Keep Up To Date with the Latest HR News

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

Sign up for a free HRMorning membership and get our newsletter!
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • HR Technology
  • Performance Management
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation & Payroll
  • Policy & Culture
  • Staff Administration
  • Wellness & Safety
  • Staff Departure
  • Employee Services
  • Work Location
  • HR Career & Self-Care

HRMorning, part of the SuccessFuel Network, provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day’s headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Privacy Policy Terms of Service
Copyright © 2021 SuccessFuel

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

preloader