Skip to main content

No ADA violation: Company unknowingly terminated worker for health-related absences

AL

By

Last updated November 6, 20241 min read
No ADA violation: Company unknowingly terminated worker for health-related absences

The ADA protects employees from disability-related termination, but what happens if the person never mentioned they had a disability?

Here’s what the 2nd Circuit had to say about that question.

No prior notice

Jesse Longway worked at Myers Industries when he began missing work to receive treatments for his pancreaitis. He told his supervisor the treatments were just for a “one-time injury” that would have no effect on his ability to work.

But his repeated absences proved otherwise, so the company terminated him. Longway sued for discrimination under the ADA, failure to accommodate and retaliation. He argued that even if he never informed anyone of his condition, his “perceived disability” still played a part in his termination.

Based on Longway’s conversations with his supervisor, however, the court found no one could have reasonably linked his absences to a disability. Longway even chose not to fill out a short-term disability form his supervisor provided.

This highlights how employers aren’t responsible for accommodating unknown medical conditions – some of the burden of establishing a disability falls to the employee.

Cite: Longway v. Myers Industries, 5/26/20.

Filed underEmployment Law
Share

Further Reading

  • Unpaid Pre-Shift Work Costs New Jersey Employer $725K

    A New Jersey drywall installer must pay $725,000 after failing to pay 48 workers overtime for pre-shift work performed while they waited for transportation to job sites. The U.S. Department of Labor’s (DOL) Wage and Hour Division found P & B Partitions Inc. violated the Fair Labor Standards Act’s overtime rules. The company also refused […]

  • Connecticut Joins States Regulating Workplace AI: 7 Compliance Steps

    Connecticut is putting employers on notice over workplace AI. Effective Oct. 1, 2026, SB 5 clarifies that Connecticut employers facing a discrimination claim can’t blame the artificial intelligence (AI) tools they use to make hiring, promotion, discipline or termination decisions. Other changes that kicked in the same day: And there’s more coming. The law’s second […]

  • Pa. Court Sets 3-Year Deadline for Minimum Wage Act Claims

    Pennsylvania employers face a three-year window for employees to sue over unpaid minimum wages or overtime under state law, rather than the six years a trial court previously allowed. The ruling came in a case involving 20 pharmacy employees seeking overtime for work done from 2017 to 2019. The employers argued the claims were filed […]

  • Hidden Payroll Rounding Risk: Unpaid Pre-Shift Time Under Scrutiny

    Required pre-shift tasks – and whether employees are paid for them – are at the center of a former hospital nurse’s wage dispute. Chestnut Hill Hospital required nurses to change into surgical scrubs by 7 a.m. for a morning huddle. Pamela McBride sued under the Fair Labor Standards Act, alleging the hospital didn’t pay her […]