• FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
        • SEE MORE
          PREMIUM RESOURCES
  • HR DEEP DIVES
        • Coronavirus (COVID-19) Resources for HR Professionals
          Employment Law
          Labor Law Posting Requirements: Everything You Need to Know
          Recruiting
          businesswoman selecting future employees on digital interfaces
          Recruiting Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
          Performance Management
          vector image of young female making star rating
          Performance Review Resources
          Employment Law
          Understanding Equal Employment Opportunity and the EEOC
          Recruiting
          Onboarding Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
  • CORONAVIRUS & HR

  • LOGIN
  • SIGN UP FREE

HR Morning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
        • SEE MORE
          PREMIUM RESOURCES
  • HR DEEP DIVES
        • Coronavirus (COVID-19) Resources for HR Professionals
          Employment Law
          Labor Law Posting Requirements: Everything You Need to Know
          Recruiting
          businesswoman selecting future employees on digital interfaces
          Recruiting Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
          Performance Management
          vector image of young female making star rating
          Performance Review Resources
          Employment Law
          Understanding Equal Employment Opportunity and the EEOC
          Recruiting
          Onboarding Resources for HR & Hiring Managers
  • CORONAVIRUS & HR
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • More
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Staff Administration
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • Employee Services
    • Work Location
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans

Fired because wife was disabled? No problem, court says

State Law Was No Help To Employee
Tom D'Agostino
by Tom D'Agostino
February 22, 2021
3 minute read
  • SHARE ON

Kentucky’s highest court held that the state’s civil rights act does not prohibit employers from discharging employees based on their association with an individual who has a disability.

It’s clear that discriminating against applicants and employees based on their disability violates the law. But when it comes to associational discrimination – that is, discrimination based on a non-disabled individual’s association or relationship with an individual who does have a disability – the answer is less clear, at least when it comes to state rather than federal law.

Case in point: Kentucky’s highest court recently decided that the Kentucky Civil Rights Act does not prevent employers from discharging an employee based on the disability of an individual with whom the employee associates.

Hired as Driver

Michael Lee Barnett was hired as a driver by Central Kentucky Hauling (CKH) in 2011. At the time of the hiring, CKH knew Barnett’s wife has cystic fibrosis.

Barnett’s wife’s health declined after he was hired. She received a double lung transplant early in 2014, but her health continued to decline.

At around the same time as the transplant, supervisors at CKH confronted Barnett about a rumor that he was disparaging the company to co-workers. Barnett denied that he was doing so. He also said that during the confrontation a supervisor mentioned the fact that he had taken time off to care for his wife.

CKH terminated Barnett’s employment at the end of 2014. It said it did so due to a lack of work.

Barnett did not believe that was the real reason for his discharge. He understood that one of his supervisors “wanted him gone.”

Suit Filed in State Court

He sued CKH in state court, accusing it of violating the Kentucky Civil Rights Act by terminating his employment based on his association with his wife.

CKH sought to have the case dismissed, arguing that the Kentucky Civil Rights Act does not create a cause of action for associational discrimination. The trial court agreed and granted the motion.

After an intermediate state appeals court affirmed the trial court’s ruling, Barnett filed an appeal with the Supreme Court of Kentucky.

After reviewing the relevant statutory language, the state’s highest court agreed with the lower courts’ rulings in favor of the employer.

Specifically, the court noted that the clear language of the statute prohibits disability discrimination only against qualified individuals with disabilities.

Language Is Clear

Barnett argued that the statute is broad enough to bar discrimination based on association, but the court disagreed. But statutes cannot be interpreted contrary to their plain language, the court explained.

Although the statute does create a cause of action for those who are regarded as having a disability, it does not go so far as to ban discrimination based on association, the court added.

A contrary conclusion would contravene the plain language of the statute, it said.

The court affirmed the ruling in the employer’s favor.

Employers should note that the federal Americans with Disabilities Act includes a provision that specifically bans the kind of associational discrimination alleged in this case. As the ruling shows, state laws may provide less protection to employees.

Barnett v Cent. Kentucky Hauling LLC, No. 2019-SC-0064-DG (Ky. 2/18/21).

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS immediately access 10 FREE HR guides.

I WANT MY FREE GUIDES

Keep Up To Date with the Latest HR News

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

Sign up for a free HRMorning membership and get our newsletter!
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • HR Technology
  • Performance Management
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation & Payroll
  • Policy & Culture
  • Staff Administration
  • Wellness & Safety
  • Staff Departure
  • Employee Services
  • Work Location
  • HR Career & Self-Care

HRMorning, part of the SuccessFuel Network, provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day’s headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Privacy Policy Terms of Service
Copyright © 2021 SuccessFuel

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

preloader