Skip to main content

Employee flunks drug test — then collects six-figure payout

TD

By

Last updated November 6, 20241 min read
Employee flunks drug test — then collects six-figure payout

Be careful how you respond if an employee flunks a drug test. 

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) just resolved a lawsuit it filed against an employer.

It had accused the employer of responding to an employee’s two positive drug tests in a way that violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

The EEOC sued Lonza America LLC, which operated a pharmaceutical and medicine manufacturing plant in Tennessee. It said Lonza illegally fired a 14-year employee after he twice tested positive for a legally controlled substance.

He was in recovery

The agency said that after the tests were conducted, Lonza learned that the employee was a recovering opioid addict who was participating in a treatment program and had a legal prescription for opioid medication.

The EEOC alleged that Lonza improperly forced the employee to begin counseling with a clinical psychologist. It said Lonza would not let him return to work unless he stopped taking the legally prescribed medication.

That alleged conduct violated the ADA, the agency said in its lawsuit against Lonza.

Six-Figure Payout

To end the suit, Lonza has agreed to pay the employee $150,000.

In addition, it will provide ADA-related training.

Note to employers: The ADA does not protect those who are currently and illegally using drugs. But it does protect recovering addicts who are no longer using drugs illegally.

Filed underEmployment Law
Share

Further Reading

  • Unpaid Pre-Shift Work Costs New Jersey Employer $725K

    A New Jersey drywall installer must pay $725,000 after failing to pay 48 workers overtime for pre-shift work performed while they waited for transportation to job sites. The U.S. Department of Labor’s (DOL) Wage and Hour Division found P & B Partitions Inc. violated the Fair Labor Standards Act’s overtime rules. The company also refused […]

  • Connecticut Joins States Regulating Workplace AI: 7 Compliance Steps

    Connecticut is putting employers on notice over workplace AI. Effective Oct. 1, 2026, SB 5 clarifies that Connecticut employers facing a discrimination claim can’t blame the artificial intelligence (AI) tools they use to make hiring, promotion, discipline or termination decisions. Other changes that kicked in the same day: And there’s more coming. The law’s second […]

  • Pa. Court Sets 3-Year Deadline for Minimum Wage Act Claims

    Pennsylvania employers face a three-year window for employees to sue over unpaid minimum wages or overtime under state law, rather than the six years a trial court previously allowed. The ruling came in a case involving 20 pharmacy employees seeking overtime for work done from 2017 to 2019. The employers argued the claims were filed […]

  • Hidden Payroll Rounding Risk: Unpaid Pre-Shift Time Under Scrutiny

    Required pre-shift tasks – and whether employees are paid for them – are at the center of a former hospital nurse’s wage dispute. Chestnut Hill Hospital required nurses to change into surgical scrubs by 7 a.m. for a morning huddle. Pamela McBride sued under the Fair Labor Standards Act, alleging the hospital didn’t pay her […]