• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

HRMorning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
  • HR DEEP DIVES
  • PODCASTS
    • VOICES OF HR
    • WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP TODAY
  • LOGIN
  • GET STARTED
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • HR Technology
  • Payroll
  • Management
  • Women’s Leadership
  • More
    • Talent Management
    • Performance Management
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans
  • Employment Law

Court rules employee was fired for insubordination, not gender discrimination

Rachel Mucha
By: Rachel Mucha
Read it on Beacon
  • Share on

About the Author

Rachel writes about Human Resource management and has been a member of the HRMorning staff since 2017. She is a graduate of Ithaca College.

Show Less
Last Updated: December 9, 2021
2 minute engagement
bosses comment was not sexist
You read HRMorning's newsletter. Beacon's Daily Brief is the version tuned to you: it skips what you've already read and leads with what you've asked Beacon about. Get your Daily Brief →

It may seem like firing a poorly performing employee would be cut and dried. But when that employee belongs to a protected class and feels they were discriminated against, things get tricky.

One company recently landed in court because of that. Here’s a breakdown of the case.

Refused to follow directions

Hilary Grubbs worked as a mold setter for Grote Industries in Indiana. She was the only female member of her crew.

Grubbs began having issues with her supervisor. He suspended her after she failed to follow some of his instructions and went against procedure. Things got worse when the supervisor tried to correct Grubbs. She laughed in his face and once again refused to comply with his directions. Due to her insubordination, Grubbs was fired.

But Grubbs didn’t believe she was fired for her performance. She denied laughing at her supervisor and being insubordinate, instead claiming he misunderstood a joke she made.

Grubbs thought she was fired for being a woman. Her boss’s boss allegedly made a comment calling her a “troublemaker,” and another employee told Grubbs she thought the boss was sexist.

Grubbs sued Grote Industries for gender discrimination.

No reference to gender

The district court sided with the company. It said the “troublesome” comment didn’t reference Grubb’s gender, and instead seemed to reference her insubordination. The only mention of sexism came from Grubbs’ co-worker calling the one boss sexist — someone who wasn’t even Grubbs’ direct supervisor or responsible for her firing.

Grubbs’ claim was also denied because she couldn’t prove her male counterparts received preferential treatment. None of them refused to follow directions like Grubbs, so no equal comparison could be made.

The company came out on top, and this case offers some important reminders. Always document when employees make mistakes or are insubordinate, and follow disciplinary policies consistently so no one can claim they were treated unfairly.

Read it on Beacon
Open this article in Beacon, from HRMorning, and ask how it applies to your company. Every answer names its source.
Read it on Beacon
Get HRMorning's newsletter tuned to you every morning: your Daily Brief on Beacon →
Filed under
  • Employment Law
  • Share on

Get the HRMorning Newsletter

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

Get it free with a Beacon account. Beacon keeps your company's HR context at hand, and every answer names its source.
Create my free account

Free Training & Resources

White Papers

Budgeting for a Successful Rewards and Recognition Program

Provided by Inspirus

White Papers

The Six Steps to a Healthy Employee Engagement Program

Provided by Terryberry

White Papers

Customer Service Teams Take the Complaints. Make Sure They Also Get the Thanks.

Provided by Inspirus

Webinars

Upskill, Reskill and Retain: How to Future-Proof Your Workforce

Provided by PAYCOM

SPONSORED CONTENT

Performance Management

Talent Management

sponsored content
Employee Recognition Program: What the First 6 Months Reveal About Whether It Will Last

Courtesy of INSPIRUS

Compensation

Recruiting

sponsored content
Salary Benchmarking: 6 Choices That Decide Whether Your Pay Data Holds Up

Courtesy of MARSH

Employment Law

Policy & Procedures

sponsored content
Policy Rollout: 4 Checkpoints That Show Employees Got the Message

Courtesy of NAVEX

Further Reading

  • Benefits
  • Employment Law
New State Law: RI Leads on Menopause Accommodation in the Workplace

More women are speaking up about menopause challenges at work – and Rhode Island has become the first state to make menopause accommodati...

  • Employment Law
Illegal Interview Questions You Should Never Ask Job Applicants

Every HR pro knows how important it is to avoid illegal interview questions. After all, no one wants to be known as that person who got the...

  • Employment Law
  • Leadership & Strategy
The Silent Warning Inside Today’s Workplaces: Harassment Prevention Strategies Aren’t Landing

Nearly a decade after #MeToo ignited a global reckoning around workplace harassment, there was hope that workplaces would look fundamentall...

  • Employment Law
Tattoos at Work: What’s OK, and What’s Not?

When it comes to tattoos at work, how much power do employers have to give a thumbs up or say no go? If you don’t know the answer, you...

  • Employment Law
Revoked Accommodation? New Dress Code Rule Sparks ADA Lawsuit

It’s not often that dress codes and ADA accommodation claims cross paths – but if an employee asks to be excused from complying with a ...

  • Employment Law
Sexual assault at work: McDonald’s franchisee agrees to pay $4.4M to teen worker

Last fall, the DOL announced that it would increase civil money penalties for child labor violations. And an egregious case out of weste...

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS Beacon, free. Check it before you say it.

GET STARTED FREE
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation
  • Policy & Procedures
  • Wellness
  • Staff Departure
  • HR Career & Self-Care
  • Health Care
  • Retirement Plans
  • DEI

HRMorning provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day's headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
Copyright© 2026 HRMorning
HRMorning Logo

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.