• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

HRMorning

  • FREE RESOURCES
  • PREMIUM CONTENT
  • HR DEEP DIVES
  • PODCASTS
    • VOICES OF HR
    • WOMEN’S LEADERSHIP TODAY
  • LOGIN
  • GET STARTED
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • HR Technology
  • Payroll
  • Management
  • Women’s Leadership
  • More
    • Talent Management
    • Performance Management
    • Leadership & Strategy
    • Compensation
    • Policy & Procedures
    • Wellness
    • Staff Departure
    • HR Career & Self-Care
    • Health Care
    • Retirement Plans
  • Employment Law

Business ignores $354K FLSA settlement agreement: DOL sues

Carol Warner
By: Carol Warner
Read it on Beacon
  • Share on

About the Author

For nearly two decades, Carol Warner has analyzed the legal and financial realities behind workplace decisions, covering employment law, benefits, payroll and HR technology. She translates complex legal updates, regulatory shifts and vendor claims into plain language that HR teams can act on. Her focus is simple: What does this mean for employers, and what should they do next? Connect with her on LinkedIn.

Show Less
Last Updated: March 4, 2024
3 minute engagement
You read HRMorning's newsletter. Beacon's Daily Brief is the version tuned to you: it skips what you've already read and leads with what you've asked Beacon about. Get your Daily Brief →

Another company has tried to dodge obligations outlined in a consent decree, according to a new lawsuit filed by the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL). The issue: an ignored FLSA settlement agreement.

But that strategy – ignoring a court order – rarely works out, as several companies have learned the hard way in recent months. For example:

  • In August 2023, Southwest Airlines found itself back in court after it allegedly failed to comply with notice requirements, and
  • In July 2023, a Baltimore logistics, engineering and management support services company faced a DOL lawsuit after allegedly failing to comply with an agreement to restore missing contributions and interest to the company’s 401(k) plan.

When companies duck out of agreed-upon financial obligations, the DOL’s next step is filing a lawsuit.

In this recent incident, an Indiana-based company operating in both Indiana and Michigan allegedly backed out of a deal to settle up on back pay and damages. Here’s how the whole mess got started – and the latest development in the case.

FLSA settlement agreement falls apart

A DOL investigation determined that Vishav Inc., d/b/a Mega Liquor & Smoke, and its owner, Bhola Singh, owed back wages and damages to 156 employees for minimum wage and overtime violations that occurred between Nov. 9, 2020, and Nov. 6, 2022.

To resolve the matter, Singh agreed to pay $354,633 in back wages and liquidated damages. But he didn’t follow through, the DOL said.

The agency sued, alleging Singh engaged in an “ongoing kickback scheme to deprive current and former employees of the money they are owed using threats, intimidation and coercion.”   

Further, the complaint alleges Singh repeatedly demanded employees sign receipts falsely attesting he had paid the back wages and damages – even though the payments had not been made. Moreover, he also threatened to fire employees to get them to comply with his demands.

In the DOL’s view, this alleged conduct amounted to further violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which prohibits employers from retaliating against workers.

DOL seeks court order, additional damages

The DOL filed a motion for a temporary restraining order and injunction against the defendants to stop them from retaliating against the workers who are owed back wages and damages.

“The Department of Labor is asking the court to hold Bhola Singh accountable for his illegal tactics to prevent employees from receiving the back wages and damages they are owed and that he agreed to pay. Retaliation against workers is a clear violation of the law,” said Regional Solicitor of Labor Christine Heri in Chicago. “We will use every available legal resource to protect workers and end retaliatory practices by employers, including seeking punitive damages for those harassed.”

Specifically, the DOL asked the court to prohibit the defendants from:

  • Interrogating, inquiring about or discussing with any employees or former employees of Mega Liquor & Smoke their potential or actual communications with the DOL and its representatives. 
  • Withholding wages, terminating or threatening to terminate workers for cooperating with DOL investigators.

The DOL also asked the court to require the defendants to:

  • Notify employees in writing of their right to cooperate with investigators.
  • Notify employees of the existence of the lawsuit in a language understood by the employee.
  • Advise the DOL in writing of the potential termination of any employee seven days before letting the worker go.

It also asked the court to award punitive damages to some employees retaliated against by the company and Singh.

We’ll keep you posted.

Info: DOL seeks an injunction to stop Indiana liquor store owner from intimidating workers, denying them back pay, 2/29/24.

Read it on Beacon
Open this article in Beacon, from HRMorning, and ask how it applies to your company. Every answer names its source.
Read it on Beacon
Get HRMorning's newsletter tuned to you every morning: your Daily Brief on Beacon →
Filed under
  • Employment Law
  • Share on

Get the HRMorning Newsletter

With HRMorning arriving in your inbox, you will never miss critical stories on labor laws, benefits, retention and onboarding strategies.

Get it free with a Beacon account. Beacon keeps your company's HR context at hand, and every answer names its source.
Create my free account

Free Training & Resources

White Papers

Beyond IVF: Why Modern Fertility Benefits Need Clinical Management

Provided by Maven Clinic

White Papers

The Six Steps to a Healthy Employee Engagement Program

Provided by Terryberry

White Papers

Uncovering the Real Value of Discount Shopping Programs

Provided by PerkSpot

White Papers

TriNet – The Total Economic Impact of TriNet PEO (Forrester TEI Report)

Provided by TriNet

SPONSORED CONTENT

Compensation

Recruiting

sponsored content
Salary Benchmarking: 6 Choices That Decide Whether Your Pay Data Holds Up

Courtesy of MARSH

Employment Law

Policy & Procedures

sponsored content
Policy Rollout: 4 Checkpoints That Show Employees Got the Message

Courtesy of NAVEX

Benefits

Staff Administration

sponsored content
PEO ROI: 3 Numbers to Know Before You Leave Patchwork HR

Courtesy of TRINET

Further Reading

  • Employment Law
Stroke Leads to Job Termination: FMLA Violation?

A federal court refused to dismiss a lawsuit filed by an employee who was fired after taking FMLA leave to recover from a stroke. The ru...

  • Employment Law
  • Policy & Procedures
Create Bulletproof Documentation: Attorney’s 7 Key Steps 

With a new administration introducing significant policy shifts, the need for strong documentation is more critical than ever. Having a...

  • Employment Law
How a (good) job description can squelch an ADA lawsuit

One way to win an ADA lawsuit is to show that the applicant or employee is not able to perform the job’s essential functions. To do th...

  • Employment Law
Sexual assault at work: McDonald’s franchisee agrees to pay $4.4M to teen worker

Last fall, the DOL announced that it would increase civil money penalties for child labor violations. And an egregious case out of weste...

  • Employment Law
7 bonus tips you absolutely need when dealing with job accommodation requests

What’s a valid accommodation request under the ADA or similar law? This case shows that the answer might not be as simple as you think...

  • Employment Law
Blame that tune: Music at work can be sexual harassment, court says

Is it possible for music played at work to constitute discrimination based on sex? Yes, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ...

Get the latest from HRMorning in your inbox PLUS Beacon, free. Check it before you say it.

GET STARTED FREE
HR Morning Logo
  • Facebook
  • Linked In
  • ABOUT HRMORNING
  • ADVERTISE WITH US
  • WRITE FOR US
  • CONTACT
  • Employment Law
  • Benefits
  • Recruiting
  • Talent Management
  • Performance Management
  • HR Technology
  • Leadership & Strategy
  • Compensation
  • Policy & Procedures
  • Wellness
  • Staff Departure
  • HR Career & Self-Care
  • Health Care
  • Retirement Plans
  • DEI

HRMorning, part of the Rover Insights Network, provides the latest HR and employment law news for HR professionals in the trenches of small-to-medium-sized businesses. Rather than simply regurgitating the day's headlines, HRMorning delivers actionable insights, helping HR execs understand what HR trends mean to their business.

Powered By Rover Insights
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | HRMorning Insider? Manage your subscription
Copyright© 2026 Rover Insights
HRMorning Logo

WELCOME BACK!

Enter your username and password below to log in

Forget Your Username or Password?

Reset Password

Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.

Log In

Why do we need your credit card for a free trial?

We ask for your credit card to allow your subscription to continue should you decide to keep your membership beyond the free trial period.  This prevents any interruption of content access.

Your card will not be charged at any point during your 21 day free trial
and you may cancel at any time during your free trial.

During your free trial, you can cancel at any time with a single click on your “Account” page.  It’s that easy.